“Novelty” as a communicative criterion of social “autopoiesis” (on the examples of differences in the society of Homeric and archaic Greece)
( Pp. 124-131)

The study is devoted to the semantic study of the phenomenon of “novelty” in the context of social and philosophical theorizing by Niklas Luhmann. The factor of novelty is considered as a necessary aspect of communication, its obligation as an informational or demonstrative component, the semantic ambiguity of the word in the subsystems of religion and art is indicated. On the basis of an etymological analysis and study of the resource of the National Corpus of the Russian language, three “basic” attitudes towards the novelty were identified: negative, neutral and positive in the fields of religion and art. Within the framework of the study, the dependence of the noting of the “new” and social valuations of this phenomenon depending on the cultural and historical context, the study of which is possible using the methodology of N. Luhmann, is indicated. As an example of the practical application of the method of “distinguishing differences” and identifying semantic dynamics in self-descriptions of autopoietic social systems, the experience of understanding the novelty in the society of Homeric and archaic Greece, the degree and forms of its acceptability/unacceptability is analyzed. In terms of Luhmann’s philosophy, the society of our research refers to segmented, in which access to the forbidden, the unknown, of which the novelty is a part, is strictly regulated. On the basis of Homer’s poems, as well as texts of the archaic period, the main mechanisms of the emergence of a novelty are shown, interpreted as news from the world of the gods, received by people through poets, oracles, signs. As a result of the study, the difference between the lexeme «novelty» and the social phenomenon of the new was demonstrated. The phenomenon of novelty is an integral characteristic of communication, however, the historical forms of its access to social life change depending on the context, which can be traced in the textual forms of self-description of a society.

Liutaeva M.S., (2020), “NOVELTY” AS A COMMUNICATIVE CRITERION OF SOCIAL “AUTOPOIESIS” (ON THE EXAMPLES OF DIFFERENCES IN THE SOCIETY OF HOMERIC AND ARCHAIC GREECE). Sociopolitical Sciences, 4 => 124-131.

Antichnye pisateli. Slovar . SPb.: Lan , 1999. 448 s.
Antonovskiy A.YU. Ot evolyutsii kommunikativnoy struktury k istoricheskoy tipizatsii obshchestv // Kontseptualizatsii obshchestva v sotsial no-filosofskoy i filosofsko-istoricheskoy refleksii. M.: INFRA-M, 2018. S. 155-165.
Artamonova M.V. O meste kategorii parnosti v kontseptual noy sisteme russkogo cheloveka // Filologiya i chelovek. 2009. № 3.
Beytson G. Razum i priroda. Neizbezhnoe edinstvo. M.: URSS; Knizhnyy dom Librokom , 2016. 256 s.
Gomer. Iliada. L.: Nauka, 1990. 574 s.
Gomer. Odisseya. M.: Nauka, 2000. 483 s.
Dal V.I. Tolkovyy slovar zhivogo velikorusskogo yazyka. V 4 t. T. 2. M.: RIPOL klassik, 2006. 784 s.
Ermolaeva E.L. Gomer. Iliada. VIII pesn SHCHit Akhilla . M.: Russkiy fond sodeystviya obrazovaniyu i nauke, 2011. 152 s.
Zaytsev A.I. Drevnegrecheskaya mifologiya i religiya. SPb.: Filologicheskiy fakul tet SPbGU; M.: Izdat. tsentr Akademiya , 2005. 208 s.
Zaytsev A.I. Drevnegrecheskiy geroicheskiy epos i Iliada Gomera // Gomer. Iliada. L.: Nauka, 1990. S. 395-416.
Kazanskene V.P., Kazanskiy N.N. Predmetno-ponyatiynyy slovar grecheskogo yazyka (krito-mikenskiy period). L.: Nauka, 1986. 209 s.
Kulishova O.V. Del fiyskiy orakul i tiraniya v arkhaicheskoy Gretsii. // Antichnyy polis. Problemy sotsial nopoliticheskoy organizatsii i ideologii antichnogo polisa. SPb.: Izd-vo S.-Peterburgskogo un-ta, 1995. 168 s.
Losev A.F. Istoriya antichnoy estetiki. Rannyaya klassika. M.: AST, 2000. 628 s.
Luman N. Vvedenie v sistemnuyu teoriyu. M.: Logos, 2007. 360 s.
Luman N. Sotsial nye sistemy. Ocherk obshchey teorii. SPb.: Nauka, 2007. 642 s.
Luman N. Obshchestvo obshchestva. V 2-kh tt. T. 1. M.: Logos, 2011. 640 s.
Luman N. Obshchestvo obshchestva. V 2-kh tt. T. 2. M.: Logos, 2011. 640 s.
Luhmann N. A systems theory of religion. Stanford university press. Stanford, California, 2013. (Kindle edition). 6403 loc.
Luhmann N. Die Religion der Gesellschaft. Suhrkamp. Verlag Frankfurt am Main, 2002.
Luhmann N. Soziale Systeme. Grundri einer allgemeinen Theorie. Suhrkamp. Verlag Frankfurt am Main, 1984.
Martin T. Drevnyaya Gretsiya. M.: Al pina Didzhital. 2013. 460 s.
Osherov S.A. Primechaniya. Iliada // Gomer. Iliada. M.: Pravda, 1984. 432 s.
Preobrazhenskiy A.G. Etimologicheskiy slovar . T. 1. M.: Tipografiya G. Lissnera i D. Sovko, 1910. 716 s.
Real nyy slovar klassicheskikh drevnostey po Lyubkeru. S.-Peterburg: Izd-e obshch-va klassicheskoy filologii i pedagogiki, 1885. 747 s.
Sadovskaya V.S., Remizov V.A. Novizna dissertatsionnykh issledovaniy v gumanitarnykh naukakh: sovremennye tendentsii i kriterii otsenki // Vestnik Mosk. gos. un-ta kul tury i iskusstv. 2010. № 1.
Slovar Antichnosti. M.: Ellis Lak; Progress, 1994. 704 s.
Surikov I.E. Drevnyaya Gretsiya: istoriya i kul tura. M.: AST; Astrel , 2005. 190 s.
Surikov I.E. Istoriya i kul tura Drevney Gretsii. Entsiklopedicheskiy slovar . M.: YAzyki slavyanskikh kul tur, 2009. 792 s.
Surikov I.E. Solon i Del fy. Studia Historia. Vol. 3. M., 2003. S. 38-52.
Filippov A.F. Kategoriya sovremennost v zerkale sotsiologicheskoy klassiki // Istoriya teoreticheskoy sotsiologii Sotsiologiya vtoroy poloviny XX - nachala XXI veka: ucheb, posobie dlya vuzov. M.: Akademicheskiy Proekt; Gaudeamus, 2010. 526 s.
Ellinskie poety VIII-III vv. do n.e. M.: Ladomir, 1999. 532 s.
Eskhil. Tragedii. M.: KHudozh. lit-ra, 1971. 380 s.
Liddell H.G., Scott R., Jones H.R. A Greek-English Lexicon (LSJ). Oxford, 1996. (elektronnyy resurs). URL: http://perseus.uchicago.edu/

Niklas Luhmann, novelty, religion and art, communication, Homeric Greece, archaic Greece.