The aim (task): Form a holistic view about the functions of the self-regulatory organizations participants; identification of relevant functions role in the legal mechanism of participation at businesses and professional activities in the self-regulatory organizations. Model: During the study the legislation on self-regulation, judicial practice are analyzed, local regulatory documents of individual self-regulatory organizations are investigated. Conclusions: the concept of the functions of self-regulatory organizations participants is formulated as a set of interrelated actions of participants, aimed at the achievement of self-regulatory organizations goals, the classification of the corresponding functions is done. There is a close connection between functions of self-regulatory organizations and their members, as well as the interconnection elements of the self-regulation system and mechanism of participation in self-regulatory organizations. The practical significance: Clear and structured designation of self-regulatory organizations participants’ functions allows to form a holistic view on the peculiarities of all subjects legal status of self-regulation. This, in turn, facilitates the identification of criterias for delimitation of self-regulatory organizations from organizations of similar legal nature, needed to improve the legal technique of the legislation on self-regulatory organizations. In addition, this study contributes to the effectiveness of the rules of business law in general. Value: Comprehensive scientific study of issues associated with participation in self-regulatory organizations, including the definition of the functions of participants, contributes to the formation within the science of business law of holistic scientific concept of self-regulation. Practical application of the findings will help to eliminate the existing shortcomings of the legislation on self-regulation, to eliminate contradictions in the judicial practice, to make the system of economic management, based on the principles of self-regulation, effective and responding modern requirements

Sungatullina L.A., (2015), FUNCTIONS OF THE SELF-REGULATORY ORGANIZATIONS PARTICIPANTS. Business in Law, 1: 45-49.

Petrov D.A. Obespechenie informatsionnoy otkrytosti pri samoregulirovanii // Grazhdanskoe pravo, 2013. № 5. 46 c.
SHunyaeva D.A. Informatsionnaya otkrytost SRO: voprosov vse bol she Elektronnyy resurs rezhim dostupa http://www.all-sro.ru/news/informatsionnaya-otkritost-sro-voprosov-vse-bolshe svobodnyy.
Polozhenie o poryadke formirovaniya spiska treteyskikh sudey Elektronnyy resurs rezhim dostupa http://sro-esp.ru/img/polozenie-po-formirovaniy-spiska-sydei-ts-31-08-2010.pdf svobodnyy.
Polozhenie o CHlenakh NP Sovet rynka Elektronnyy resurs rezhim dostupa http://www.np-sr.ru/partnership/members/experts/index.htm svobodnyy.
Reglament Treteyskogo suda pri SRO NP E.S.P. Elektronnyy resurs rezhim dostupa http://sro-esp.ru/img/reglament-ts-31-08-2010.pdf svobodnyy.
Rossiyskaya Federatsiya. Zakony. Federal nyy zakon ot 22 oktyabrya 2014g. № 320-FZ O vnesenii izmeneniy v Gradostroitel nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii Tekst // Sobranie zakonodatel stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii.- 2014. - № 43. - St. 5804.
Rossiyskaya Federatsiya. Zakony. Federal nyy zakon ot 05 maya 2014 № 99-FZ O Vnesenii izmeneniy v glavu 4 chasti pervoy Grazhdanskogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii i o priznanii utrativshimi silu otdel nykh polozheniy zakonodatel nykh aktov Rossiyskoy Federatsii Tekst // Sobranie zakonodatel stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii. - 2014. - № 19. - St. 2304.

self-regulation, self-regulatory organization, the mechanism of participation, business activities, professional activities.