Development of a Procedure for Controlled Withdrawal of Industrial Enterprises from Equilibrium for Transition to a Higher-Level Innovative Development
( Pp. 239-249)

The purpose of the study is to develop recommendations for the implementation of the procedure for the managed withdrawal of enterprises from the equilibrium state in order to move to a higher level of innovative development. Based on the results of the work, the following main conclusions were obtained. To ensure economic sustainability, an enterprise, on the one hand, must ensure an equilibrium state of its economy, that is, not go beyond the range of variation established by the development strategy. However, in this case, a contradiction arises, since the business must develop and these limits will restrain it. Therefore, the task of ensuring the economic stability of enterprises does not leave the agenda of economic research and has not yet received its final decision. As the study showed, for a managed transition to a new qualitative level within the framework of ensuring its economic stability, it needs to have technology to exit the state of economic stability in order to eliminate the limitations of the external and/or internal measurement of this category, as well as return to the original equilibrium state. In other words, to develop and implement a project for the managed withdrawal of an enterprise from an equilibrium state in order to move to a higher level of development in terms of increasing the «throughput» of a business or increasing its scale and then stabilizing this state—in the traditional sense. For these purposes, it is most acceptable to use the provisions of the theory of limitations of systems due to the need to perform a large amount of difficult-to-formalize logical examinations during the implementation of the project.

Aliev A. T., Baldin K. V., Bobryshev A. D., Pudov A. A. Development of a Procedure for Controlled Withdrawal of Industrial Enterprises from Equilibrium for Transition to a Higher-Level Innovative Development // ECONOMIC PROBLEMS AND LEGAL PRACTICE. 2023. Vol. 19. № 2. P. 239-249. (in Russ.)

Bobryshev A.D., Tarabrin M.B., Tarabrin K.M. Development of methodological foundations for building the organizational components of the company's business model // M.V. Lomonosov MITHT Bulletin. 2014. V. 9. № 5. Р. 73–82.
Gallo E. Guide HBR Conflict Resolution/Amy Gallo; Per. with the English. M. Kulneva. —Moscow: Alpina Publisher, 2020. —222 р.
Gassman O. Business Models: Top 55 Templates/Oliver Gassman, Carolyn Frankenberger, Michaela Schick; trans. from English —Moscow: Alpina Publisher, 2017. —432 p.
Goldratt E.M. Critical Chain/Eliyahu M. Goldratt; trans. from English —M.: Sberbank, 2012. —269 p.
Goldratt E.M. Goal: Continuous Improvement Process/Goldratt Eliyahu M, Cox Jef; Per. from English —Moscow: Potpurri, 2020. —400 p.
Detmer W. Goldratt Constraint Theory: A Systematic Approach to Continuous Improvement/William Detmer; trans. from English. [U. Salamatova]. —5th ed. —Moscow: Alpina Publisher, 2013. —443 p.
Zhigalova V.N. Business value assessment: tutorial/V.N. Zhigalova. —Tomsk: El Content, 2013. —216 p.
Cowan O. Fundamentals of Constraint Theory/O. Cowan, E. Fedurko. —Tallinn: tocExpert, 2017. —354 p.
Lukin Yu.F. Conflictology: conflict management: Management of the conflicts: a textbook for universities/Yu.F. Lukin. —Moscow: Academic Project; Gaudeamus, 2007. —799 p.
Osterwalder A., Pinier Yves. Building business models. Strategist and Innovator Desktop Book. Translation from English. Kulneva M. 9th edition. —Moscow: Alpina Publisher, 2020. —288 p.

economic stability, innovation, enterprise, methodology, theory of system limitation, model..