Basic Digital Rights Regulators in the European Union
( Pp. 127-131)

The development of digital rights requires the modern legal frameworks creation which confirmed by the presence of concerns on the part of states regarding to the regulation of digital rights. The European Union bodies pay attention to the unification of legal regulation. Non-governmental organizations in Europe strive to protect the citizens’ digital rights and assist in considering the opinion of the population on the regulation of digital rights. The relevance of this article is due to the fact that not only the state legislatures are involved in the digital rights regulation, but international organizations, supranational bodies and non-governmental organizations are also involved in the digital rights regulation. This trend is most clearly seen in the example of the European Union, which is concerned about the digital rights regulation, the creation of a new regulatory framework, the formation of a single legal space for the digital rights regulation, which indicates the relevance of this work. The result of the study is to reveal the active participation of stakeholders, namely the European Union bodies, UNCITRAL, the Digital Freedoms Fund, etc., in the creation of digital rights legal regulation and the unification of existing legal norms. The authors of this work made the following conclusions: the main regulator is the European Union bodies, which perform the primary task - the unification of digital rights regulation; international bodies exert significant influence; non-governmental organizations support the population in digital rights protection. Successful processes unification and the effective formation of the legal framework for the digital rights regulation should be noted as the main conclusion.

Kuznetsov M.N., Zaytsev V.V., (2021), BASIC DIGITAL RIGHTS REGULATORS IN THE EUROPEAN UNION. Economic Problems and Legal Practice, 5 => 127-131.

Akinfieva V. V. (2021). Digital financial assets as a new type of digital rights. Ex jure. Vol. 3. P. 46-55.
Castermans A., Haentjens M., De Graaff R. The Digital Single Market and Legal Certainty: A Critical Analysis // Contents and Effects of Contracts-Lessons to Learn From The Common European Sales Law, 2016, pp. 45 - 72.
Dudin M.N., Shakhov O.F., Shakhova M.S., Rusakova E.P., Sizova Y.S. (2019). Digital technologies as a driver of intellectual stratification of human resources: socio-economic inequality. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering. (2). P. 4436-4440.
Grin O. S. (2020). Binding relations concerning digital objects of civil rights. Lex Russica. Vol. 73. № 10. P. 21-31.
Khamdamova F. (2020). The impact of digital technologies on human rights. TSUL Legal Report. Vol. 1. P. 134-146.
Khisamova Z.I. Artificial Intelligence and Problems of Ensuring Cyber Security / Z.I. Khisamova, I.R. Begishev, E.L. Sidorenko // International Journal of Cyber Criminology. 2019. Vol. 13. Iss. 2. P. 564 - 577.
Kirillova E.A., Bogdan V.V., Surkov A.N., Baumshteyn A.B., Novichkov V.E.Y. (2019). Digital rights and digital objects: features of control and regulation. Journal of advanced research in dynamical and control systems. Vol. 11 (S10). P. 567-573.
Kuznetsov Mikhail Nikolayevich, Ocaqli Ulvi (2020). Information Communication Technologies and Legal Education Correlation in Russian Federation and European Union. Pixel International Conferences the Future of Education. Pp. 333-336.
Ostanina E., Titova E. (2020). The protection of consumer rights in the digital economy conditions - the experience of the BRICS countries. BRICS Law Journal.Vol. 7. P. 119-146.
Paris Th., Simon J.P The European Audiovisual Industry and the Digital Single Market: Trends, Issues and Policies // Digiwold Economic Journal, 2016, No. 101, p. 17.
Perry S., Roda C. (2016). Human rights and digital technology: digital tightrope. American University of Paris. P. 1-203.
Romero-Moreno Felipe. Notice and staydown and social media: amending Article 13 of the Proposed Directive on Copyright / International Review of Law, Computers and Technology. 2019. V. 33. Issue 2. P. 187 - 210.
Rusakova, E. P., Inshakova, A.O. (2021). Industrial and manufacturing engineering in digital legal proceedings in the Asia-Pacific region: a new level of quality based on data, blockchain and ai. International Journal for Quality Research. 15 (1). Pp. 273-289.
Rusakova, E.P., Inshakova, A.O., Frolova, E.E. (2021). Legal Regulation of Internet Courts in China. In: Popkova E.G., Sergi B.S. (eds) Modern Global Economic System: Evolutional Development vs. Revolutionary Leap. ISC 2019. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 198. Pp. 1515-1521.
Tomalty J. (2017). Is There a Human Right to Internet Access Philosophy Now. Vol. 118. P. 6-8.
Vinton G. (2012). Cerf Emergent Properties, Human Rights, and the Internet. IEEE Internet Computing. Vol. 16(2). 87-88.
Yeung K. Responsibility and AI. A study of the implications of advanced digital technologies (including AI systems) for the concept of responsibility within a human rights framework / K. Yeung. Council of Europe study DGI, 2019. 98 p.

digital rights, the Digital Services Law, the Digital Freedoms Foundation, the European Union.