LEGALITY AND VALIDITY OF INQUISITOR’S ACTING AT FREE WILL DURING CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
( Pp. 416-418)
More about authors
Ramil Ya. Mamedov
Cand. Sci. (Law), Assoc. Prof., Criminal Procedure Department
Kuban State University
Krasnodar, Russian Federation
Kuban State University
Krasnodar, Russian Federation
Abstract:
The goal of this article is the necessity to expand the means of control of law enforcers when making decisions “at will” in the process of investigating crimes, for most of evidences normally are collected during the course of preliminary investigation, which is when the inquisitor gives the qualification to the committed crime and determines the ways and means of investigation. Nevertheless, the possibilities of actual realization for equality of parties of criminal proceedings during the prejudicial stages of criminal procedure are rather meager. The given article contemplates on the boundaries of legality and validity of inquisitor’s acting at free will in the context of contemporary criminal procedural reform. Due to the lack of competitiveness in prejudicial stages of investigation, it is necessary to expand the list of means for inquisitor that are bound by judicial control. The regulations in this article are aimed at eliminating the mistakes and law abuses by people that are responsible for investigating criminal cases, which in the end will certainly contribute to creating the better criminal procedure.
How to Cite:
Ramil Y.M., (2018), LEGALITY AND VALIDITY OF INQUISITOR’S ACTING AT FREE WILL DURING CRIMINAL PROCEDURE. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 3 => 416-418.
Reference list:
Dubovitskiy V.N. Zakonnost i usmotrenie v sovetskom gosudarstvennom upravlenii/ V.N. Dubovitskiy.- Minsk, 1984. - 141s. Elektronnyy resurs dostup k pravovoy sisteme GARANT (data obrashcheniya 7.12.2017).
Dubrivnyy V.A. Deyatel nost sledovatelya po rassledovaniyu prestupleniy. Saratov, 1987. -s. 6-7. Elektronnyy resurs dostup k pravovoy sisteme GARANT (data obrashcheniya 22.11.2017).
Manokhin V.M. Pravovoe gosudarstvo i problema upravleniya po usmotreniyu/ V.M. Manokhin// Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. 1990. № 1 - s. 23-26. Elektronnyy resurs dostup k pravovoy sisteme GARANT (data obrashcheniya 1.12.2017).
Mamedov O.YA. Otsenka dopustimosti dokazatel stv na dosudebnom proizvodstve po ugolovnym delam: dis. kand. yurid. nauk. Volgograd, 2007.-189 s.
Martsifin P.G. Usmotrenie sledovatelya (ugolovno-protsessual nyy aspekt): dis. dokt. yurid. nauk. Omsk, 2002. - 236 s. Elektronnyy resurs dostup k pravovoy sisteme GARANT (data obrashcheniya 9.01.2018).
Dubrivnyy V.A. Deyatel nost sledovatelya po rassledovaniyu prestupleniy. Saratov, 1987. -s. 6-7. Elektronnyy resurs dostup k pravovoy sisteme GARANT (data obrashcheniya 22.11.2017).
Manokhin V.M. Pravovoe gosudarstvo i problema upravleniya po usmotreniyu/ V.M. Manokhin// Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. 1990. № 1 - s. 23-26. Elektronnyy resurs dostup k pravovoy sisteme GARANT (data obrashcheniya 1.12.2017).
Mamedov O.YA. Otsenka dopustimosti dokazatel stv na dosudebnom proizvodstve po ugolovnym delam: dis. kand. yurid. nauk. Volgograd, 2007.-189 s.
Martsifin P.G. Usmotrenie sledovatelya (ugolovno-protsessual nyy aspekt): dis. dokt. yurid. nauk. Omsk, 2002. - 236 s. Elektronnyy resurs dostup k pravovoy sisteme GARANT (data obrashcheniya 9.01.2018).
Keywords:
the investigator, selection behavior at their discretion, collection of evidence, a preliminary investigation, judicial control, criminal procedure reform.
