VAGUE FUTURE OF THE EU IMMIGRATION POLICY EXTERNAL DIMENSION
( Pp. 32-39)
More about authors
Pogorelskaya Anastasia M.
kandidat istoricheskih nauk, docent kafedry mirovoy politiki
National research Tomsk state university
Tomsk, Russian Federation
National research Tomsk state university
Tomsk, Russian Federation
Abstract:
The article provides the analysis of the
“external dimension” migration policy of the European Union. The purpose of the
study was to assess the potential of the “external dimension” for managing
international migration in the interests of the European Union both in
relatively favorable and crisis conditions to determine the possibilities of
its application in the future. To achieve this goal, the article provides an
overview of the evolution of the “external dimension”, an assessment of the
resources available to the EU for the implementation of the “external
dimension” and a description of the difficulties accompanying its
implementation. Conclusions: Implementation of the “external dimension” of the
EU's immigration policy faces a number of difficulties, including the lack of
financial resources during crises, the lack of effective incentives for third
countries to bear additional burdens in the EU interests, the need to
coordinate the actions and conflicting interests among different actors and
levels of governance, etc. Despite the difficulties, “external dimension” became
one of the priority areas in the EU immigration policy as a result of the
2014-2016 migration crisis. However, the EU immigration policy in general needs
to be updated but the EU is not able to provide any innovative migration
governance solutions. Therefore, the EU may find it increasingly difficult to
expand its cooperation with third countries for common migration governance in
future. In case of protracted crisis and the lack of progress in updating the
EU immigration policy, the future of its “external dimension” seems to be
vague.
How to Cite:
Pogorelskaya A.M., (2021), VAGUE FUTURE OF THE EU IMMIGRATION POLICY EXTERNAL DIMENSION. History and Modern Perspectives, 2 => 32-39.
Reference list:
Boswell Ch. The external dimension of EU immigration and asylum policy // International Affairs. 2003. Vol.79. №3. P.619-638.
Burlyuk O. The oops of EU engagement abroad: analysing unintended consequences of EU external action // Journal of Common Market Studies. 2017. Vol. 55(5). P. 1009-1025
Castles St. Development and Migration - Migration and Development. What comes first Global Perspective and African Experience // Theoria. 2009. Vol. 56. № 121. P. 1-31.
Castles St., de Haas H. Miller M.J. The Age of Migration, 5th edition. Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.
Clemens M.A. Does Development Reduce Migration IZA Discussion Paper № 8592. October 2014. URL: http://ftp.iza.org/dp8592.pdf
de Haas H. Turning the Tide Why Development Will Not Stop Migration // Development and Change. 2007. Vol. 38. № 5. P. 819-841.
Keohane R.O. Nye J. Power and Interdependence. Longman, 2001. 334 p.
Kunz K. Governing International Migration through Partnership // Third World Quarterly. 2013. Vol. 34. № 7. P. 1227-1246.
Lavenex S. Shifting Up and Out: The Foreign Policy of European Immigration Control // West European Politics. 2006. Vol. 29. № 2. P. 329-350.
Lavenex S. The Europeanization of Refugee Policies: Between Human Rights and Internal Security. Ashgate, 2001. 246 p.
Lavenex S. U arer E.M. The External Dimension of Europeanization: The Case of Immigration Policies // Cooperation and Conflict. 2004. Vol. 39. № 4. P. 417-443.
Manners I. Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms // Journal of Common Market Studies. 2002. Vol.40. Issue 2. P. 235-258.
Massey D.S., Arango J., Hugo G., Kouaouci A., Pellegrin A. Worlds in Motion: Understanding International Migration at the End of the Millennium. Oxford University Press, 1998. 376 p.
Reslow N. Horizontal and Vertical Diversity: Unintended Consequences of EU External Migration Policy // The International Spectator. 2019. Vol. 54. № 1. P. 31-44.
Reslow N. Not everything that counts can be counted : Assessing success of EU external migration policy // International Migration. 2017. Vol. 55 (6). P. 156-169.
Taylor J.E. The new economics of labour migration and the role of remittances in the migration process // International Migration. 1999. Vol. 37. № 1. P. 63-88.
Wolff S. The Politics of Negotiating EU Readmission Agreements: Insights from Morocco and Turkey // European Journal of Migration and Law. 2014. Vol. 16 (1). P. 69-95.
Bisson L.S. Vneshnee izmerenie migratsionnoy politiki ES: instrumenty i vygody // Nauchno-analiticheskiy vestnik Instituta Evropy RAN. 2018. № 5. S. 21-26.
Potemkina O.YU. Posle krizisa: novyy start migratsionnoy politiki ES // Sovremennaya Evropa. 2019. № 6. S.18-29.
Tamash K. Otsenka vneshney migratsionnoy politiki ES. Analiticheskiy brif // Prazhskiy protsess, noyabr 2019. Elektronnyy resurs: https://www.icmpd.org/publications/policy-briefs/
Burlyuk O. The oops of EU engagement abroad: analysing unintended consequences of EU external action // Journal of Common Market Studies. 2017. Vol. 55(5). P. 1009-1025
Castles St. Development and Migration - Migration and Development. What comes first Global Perspective and African Experience // Theoria. 2009. Vol. 56. № 121. P. 1-31.
Castles St., de Haas H. Miller M.J. The Age of Migration, 5th edition. Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.
Clemens M.A. Does Development Reduce Migration IZA Discussion Paper № 8592. October 2014. URL: http://ftp.iza.org/dp8592.pdf
de Haas H. Turning the Tide Why Development Will Not Stop Migration // Development and Change. 2007. Vol. 38. № 5. P. 819-841.
Keohane R.O. Nye J. Power and Interdependence. Longman, 2001. 334 p.
Kunz K. Governing International Migration through Partnership // Third World Quarterly. 2013. Vol. 34. № 7. P. 1227-1246.
Lavenex S. Shifting Up and Out: The Foreign Policy of European Immigration Control // West European Politics. 2006. Vol. 29. № 2. P. 329-350.
Lavenex S. The Europeanization of Refugee Policies: Between Human Rights and Internal Security. Ashgate, 2001. 246 p.
Lavenex S. U arer E.M. The External Dimension of Europeanization: The Case of Immigration Policies // Cooperation and Conflict. 2004. Vol. 39. № 4. P. 417-443.
Manners I. Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms // Journal of Common Market Studies. 2002. Vol.40. Issue 2. P. 235-258.
Massey D.S., Arango J., Hugo G., Kouaouci A., Pellegrin A. Worlds in Motion: Understanding International Migration at the End of the Millennium. Oxford University Press, 1998. 376 p.
Reslow N. Horizontal and Vertical Diversity: Unintended Consequences of EU External Migration Policy // The International Spectator. 2019. Vol. 54. № 1. P. 31-44.
Reslow N. Not everything that counts can be counted : Assessing success of EU external migration policy // International Migration. 2017. Vol. 55 (6). P. 156-169.
Taylor J.E. The new economics of labour migration and the role of remittances in the migration process // International Migration. 1999. Vol. 37. № 1. P. 63-88.
Wolff S. The Politics of Negotiating EU Readmission Agreements: Insights from Morocco and Turkey // European Journal of Migration and Law. 2014. Vol. 16 (1). P. 69-95.
Bisson L.S. Vneshnee izmerenie migratsionnoy politiki ES: instrumenty i vygody // Nauchno-analiticheskiy vestnik Instituta Evropy RAN. 2018. № 5. S. 21-26.
Potemkina O.YU. Posle krizisa: novyy start migratsionnoy politiki ES // Sovremennaya Evropa. 2019. № 6. S.18-29.
Tamash K. Otsenka vneshney migratsionnoy politiki ES. Analiticheskiy brif // Prazhskiy protsess, noyabr 2019. Elektronnyy resurs: https://www.icmpd.org/publications/policy-briefs/
Keywords:
external migration policy, immigration policy, the European Union, migration, transit countries, sending countries.