CORPORATE SUSTAINABILITY: ESTIMATES WITH 9AAS MODELS OF SUSTAINABLE ACTIVITIES
( Pp. 119-133)

Corporate sustainability (sustainable development) efforts need to be based on effective models, analysis, estimates and presentations on sustainability. Corporate sustainability is linked with and covers corporate activities. Links between activities and sustainability needs additional surveys. Systemic analysis and approach helps in surveys and raise effectiveness of results in various areas. In this connection, raise of effectiveness of corporate sustainability estimates, modeling, presentations - with accent to corporate activity- via systemic analysis and approach, was defined as the goal of this survey. In frames of this, following tasks were formulated and solved: To supplement available models of corporate activities with ones up to more systemic and large scale format Based on supplements mentioned, to develop systemic models of corporate activity sustainability Based on systemic models of corporate activity sustainability, to update methodology of sustainability estimates and presenting results of estimates Subject, frame of research, materials and methods used. Researches are focused on corporate sustainability, framed with activities, sustainability of corporations and other activity subjects. Surveys were based on worldwide experience of esti-mates, modeling, presenting of corporate activities and sustainability (over 40 publications of Russian and foreign authors), with use of systemic approach, including systemic- structural analysis. Main results. Proposed additional systemic indicator of corporate sustainability: state of summarized activity aspects. Base on that, systemic five context corporate sustainability model 5CCS is developed and presented. The model considers all known summarized sustainability contexts. Nine systemic aspects of organized activities (including corporate ones) are identified: orientation, features, inter links, stakeholders, realization, appearances, development, management and improvements. Based on this, model 9AA of organized nine aspect activity is developed and proposed. The model works for corporate activities as well. Based on 9AA model, developed and presented 9AAS model of nine-aspect corporate activity sustainability. 9aas model is detailed with its six modifications: 9AASsn, 9AASan, 9AASi, 9AASh, 9AAS ht and 9AASt. Weight scoring method is proposed for quantitative sustainability estimates with 9AAS models. Radar charts are recommended as most informative ones for demonstrating results of sustainability estimates with 9AAS models. Results novelty and pragmatic application. A new classification of organized activity systemic aspects is presented. For the first time such additional corporate sustainability indicator is proposed, as state of systemic aspects of corporate activities. Five context corporate sustainability model 5CCs, nine aspect activity 9AA model, nine aspect activity sustainability AAS model, with its six modifications 9AASsn, 9AASan, 9AASi, 9AASh, 9AASh, 9AASht and 9AASt, are also proposed for the first time. Based on 9AAS model, pragmatic methods of sustainability estimates and presentations are recommended. 9AAS models, related sustainability analysis, estimates and presentations are recommended as a supplementary tool (independent estimates, recommendations, supporting information, expertize, audit) for ensuring corporate sustainability with all known methods and means. 5CCs, 9AA, 9AAS models are universal as related to an “Actor” as general subject of activities. These models work for corporations, corporate parts, components, elements, groups of corporations and other carriers of organized activities. Also 9AA model ensures systemic-structural analysis of activities for raise effectiveness in different areas of applications. Developed, proposed corporate activities , sustainability models, methods of estimates, presentations can be used by specialists for sustainability, human resources, effectiveness, quality, HSE, business development and public relations. Conclusions. 1. It is shown that use of systemic approach raises informational content, validity, scale, completeness and reliability of estimates of corporate sustainability (sustainable development) 2. Proposed additional indicator of corporate sustainability: state of systemic aspects of corporate activities. Integrated, five context corporate sustainability model 5CCS is presented. The model includes proposed indicator and can be used as a “map” for complex analysis and estimates of corporate sustainability. 3. Based on systemic approach, nine systemic, summarized aspects of organized activities (including corporate ones) are identified: orientation, features, inter links, stakeholders, realization, appearances, development, management and improvements. Developed, presented systemic model 9AA of nine summarized aspects of corporate activities and nine aspect corporate activity sustainability model 9AAS with its six main modifications 9AASsn, 9AASan, 9AASi, 9AASh, 9AASht and 9AASd. 9AAS models ensure sustainability estimates at levels of separate sectors of separate summarized aspects of activities of separate corporate parts, at aspect level, separate corporate part level and at whole corporation level. 4. 9AAS models, related sustainability analysis, estimates and presentations are recommended as a supplementary tool (independent estimates, recommendations, supporting information, expertize, audit) for ensuring corporate sustainability with all known methods and means. 5. 5CCs, 9AA, 9AAS models are universal as related to an “Actor”, as general subject of activities. These models work for corporations, corporate parts, components, elements, groups of corporations and other carriers of organized activities. Also 9AA model ensures systemic-structural analysis of activities for raise effectiveness in different areas of applications. 6. Weight scoring method is proposed for quantitative sustainability estimates with 9AAS models. Radar charts are recommended as most informative ones for demonstrating results of sustainability estimates with 9AAS models

Bruslov A.Y., (2015), CORPORATE SUSTAINABILITY: ESTIMATES WITH 9AAS MODELS OF SUSTAINABLE ACTIVITIES. Sociopolitical Sciences, 1 => 119-133.

Bruslov A.YU. Vnutrennyaya ustoychivost biznes-organizatsiy: modeli i prioritety. Federatsiya, №1-2 (112-113), s 40-45 2014, Agentstvo Nauchnoy Pechati (ANP), Moskva
Bruslov A.YU. Vnutrikorporativnaya ustoychivost : prakticheskie rekomendatsii. Sotsial no-politicheskie nauki, №2, 2014, s 16-22, Izdatel skiy Dom YUr-Vak, Moskva
A.YU. Bruslov. Urovni parametrov Raznoobraziya (uchastnikov biznes-protsessov) dlya ego kolichestvennykh otsenok. Ob edinyennyy nauchnyy zhurnal, №8 (196), 2007, M, Fond pravovykh issledovaniy, s. 3-9
Vakhromov E.N., Markaryan D.YU.. Otsenka ustoychivogo razvitiya i funktsionirovaniya predpriyatiya: faktory, kriterii, osobennosti, ZHurnal Vestnik Astrakhanskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta, N4, 2008. Internet- resurs http://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/otsenka-ustoychivogo-razvitiya-i-funktsionirovaniya-predpriyatiya-faktory-kriterii-osobennosti
GOST R ISO 9004-2010. Gruppa T59. NATSIONAL NYY STANDART ROSSIYSKOY FEDERATSII. MENEDZHMENT DLYA DOSTIZHENIYA USTOYCHIVOGO USPEKHA ORGANIZATSII. Podkhod na osnove menedzhmenta kachestva. Managing for the sustained success of an organization. A quality management approach.OKS 03.120.10.OKSTU 0025. Data vvedeniya 2011-06-01,2011.
Nabiev A.M. Kompleksnaya otsenka ustoychivosti predpriyatiy. 2003. Internet resurs http://www.lib. csu.ru/vch/8/2002 02/027.pdf
Radial nye (setchatye) diagrammy. Internet resurs https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/ D0 94 D0 B8 D0 B0 D0 B3 D1 80 D0 B0 D0 BC D0 BC D0 B0
Solodovnikov A.V., Solodovnikova S.V. Diagrammy v Microsoft Office Excel. Ufa: UGNTU, 2011. - 30 s. Internet resurs. http://bash.rosmu.ru/activity/attach/events/821/excel.pdf
Adam Wilkinson and Bill Kirkup Adam Wilkinson. Measurement of Sustainable Procurement, ADAM WILKINSON AND ASSOCIATES, 2009, 778 pages; www resource http://www.adamwilkinson.com/documents/measuring 20SP 20report 20release.pdf
Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable 2nd edn. London: www resource. Earthscan.ftp://ftp.geo.puc.cl/Pub/Apaulsen/TEXTOS /INDICADORES 20DE 20SUSTENTABILIDAD 20BELL.pdf
BIST sustainability index research methodology, 2014, www resource http://borsaistanbul.com/en/indices/bist-stock-indices/bist-sustainability-index
Caerphilly Sustainability Index. www resource. http://www.caerphillysustainability.co.uk/
Candice Stevens. Measuring Sustainable Development, The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Magazine, N10, September , 2005, www resource http://www.oecd.org/std/35407580.pdf
Christoph B hringer and Patrick Jochem. Measuring the Immeasurable:A Survey of Sustainability Indices. 20 pages, 2006, Discussion Paper No. 06-073. Centre for European Economic Research. www resource ftp://ftp.zew.de/pub/zew-docs/dp/dp06073.pdf
CIPS Sustainability Index. Materials of The CIPS Sustainability team, 2013, www resource https://cips-sustainabilityindex.com/supplier/
Dow Jones Sustainability Indices, RobecoSAM Indices. Sustainability assessment. 2013. www resources. http://www.sustainability-indices.com/sustainability-assessment/corporate-sustainability.jsp; http://www.robecosam.com/images/sample-questionnaire.pdf
Emiel Elferink PhD Gijs Kuneman MSc Anneloes Visser MSc Erna van der Wal MSc.Sustainability Performance Assessment of Farming Practices Guidelines for developers of quantitative monitoring tools ,Version - 1.0 CLM, Centre for Agriculture and Environment (CLM), Culemborg, Netherlands, April 2012. www resource http://www.saiplatform.org/uploads/Modules/ Li-brary/spa version 1.0 may 2012.pdf
Indicators of Sustainability. Sustainable measures materials, 2014, www resource http://www.sustainablemeasures. com/indicators
Peter Matthies. A New Model for CSR and Sustainability. Conscious Business Institute, 2012; Conscious Business Institute Materials. www resources http://www.consciousbusinessinstitute. com; Blog Entry by PeterM in Corporate Social Responsibility , edited by John Howell, http://www.justmeans.com/blogs/csr-20- E2 80 93-a-new-model-for-csr-and-sustainability
Sustainability calculation methodology. Materials of Sustainable Society Foundation (SSF), 2012, www resource http://www.ssfindex.com/ssi/calculation-methodology/; http://www.ssfindex.com/cms/wp-content/uploads/calculation-formulas2012.pdf
Sustainabilty parameters Dynamics, Shell 2013 Sustainability report, www resource http://reports.shell.com/sustainability-report/2013/servicepages/downloads/files/entire shell sr13.pdf
Sustainable value calculator. 2102. www resource http://www.sustainablevaluecalculator.com/en/contact/
Sustainability 2013 report, 2014; www resource http://www.saipem.com/site/home/documentation/sustainability/sustainability-reports.html50.
United Nations sustainable development indicators. 2007. www resource http://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/natlinfo/ indica-tors/guidelines.pdf
United Nations Global Sustainability Report, 2013/corporate sustainability snapshot 2013. www resource http://www.unglobalcompact.org/AboutTheGC/global corporate sustainability report.html
A.Yu. Bruslov. Diversity dimension levels for diversity quantitative evaluation. Obiedinenny nauchny zhurnal, 8 (196), 2007, Fond pravovykh issledovaniy, p.10-15

Resistance, sustainable development, the stability of corporations, activities, patienterna model of corporate sustainability 5ККУ, aspect of, system aspects of, organized activity, the subject of activity, Devyataikina model activities Д9А, Devyataikina a model of sustainable activities Д9АУ, a model of sustainability, built-in model, nested doll-a structural model, nested doll-aspect model, the hierarchical model, hierarchically-tabular model, wood shaped model, method, sustainability assessment, a model of sustainable activities, sector aspect of the activity, presentation sustainability, score-weight method, radar chart, examination of stability, audit of sustainability, a systematic approach, system analysis.