TO THE QUESTION OF EXISTENCE OF INVESTIGATION SECRECY IN THE RUSSIAN CRIMINAL PROCESS
( Pp. 242-244)

Task - Discussed the issue with the Institute secrets of investigation in the criminal process, draws attention to the contradictions in the current legislation. Model - Methodological basis of the work - universal Dialectical-materialistic method of cognition of objective reality. We used the General scientific methods of analysis and synthesis, induction and deduction. Through private-scientific - formal-legal method analyzed and summarized the content of the provisions of legislation regulating the analyzed aspect. Conclusions - Questions for secrecy are imperfect from the point of view of its legal regulation. On the basis of this it is proposed to introduce corresponding amendments into the existing legislation. Research/the possibility of subsequent use of results of scientific work - the work of the complements of scientific-legal basis of the Institute of investigation secrecy; can be used in further studies, associated with the development of the analyzed problems; during preparation of changes and additions in the current legislation. Practical value - some of the conclusions referred to in article can be taken into account in the practical activity of the courts, prosecution bodies and preliminary investigation. Originality/value - based analysis of current legislation, are studied theoretical and applied aspect of the realization of the Institute of investigation secrecy of the criminal proceedings. Is intended for scientists, teachers, students in all areas of legal profile and are interested secrecy of investigation.

Isaeva R.M., (2014), TO THE QUESTION OF EXISTENCE OF INVESTIGATION SECRECY IN THE RUSSIAN CRIMINAL PROCESS. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 2 => 242-244.

Krylov A.V. K voprosu ob opredelenii tayny sledstviya: Rossiyskiy sledovatel , № 9, 2003. S. 32-37.
Levi A.A., SHirev D.A. Nekotorye sovremennye problemy glasnosti predvaritel nogo rassledovaniya i sudebnogo razbiratel stva: Zakon i pravo, № 2, 2012. S.72-73.
Nedopustimost razglasheniya dannykh predvaritel nogo rassledovaniya. Prisyazhnyy poverennyy: http://evcppk.ru/rukovodstvo-po-rassledovaniyu-prestuplenij/4011-nedopustimost-razglasheniya-dannyx redvaritelnogo-rassledovaniya.html
Pilipenko YU. S. K voprosu o kvalifikatsii pravovykh tayn: ZHurnal rossiyskogo prava, № 9, 2009;
Sidorova E.I. Ponyatie i sostav sledstvennoy tayny: Vestnik Voronezhskogo instituta MVD Rossii № 3, 2007. S 54-56. Bolee podrobno o ponyatii tayna , tayna rassledovaniya , dannye predvaritel nogo rassledovaniya , svedeniya, sostavlyayushchie taynu predvaritel nogo rassledovaniya sm.: Kutazova I. V. Nedopustimost razglasheniya dannykh ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva na stadii predvaritel nogo rassledovaniya: Vestnik Barnaul skogo yuridicheskogo instituta, № 2(15), 2008. S. 80-84.
Tomin V.T. Ugolovnyy protsess: aktual nye problemy teorii i praktiki. M., 2009. S.257.
Ukaz Prezidenta RF ot 6 marta 1997 g. № 188 (red. ot 23.09.2005) quot;Ob utverzhdenii Perechnya svedeniy konfidentsial nogo kharaktera quot;: quot;Rossiyskaya gazeta quot;, № 51, 14 marta 1997.
Ugolovno-protsessual nyy kodeks RSFSR ot 27.10.1960 g. : quot;Vedomosti VS RSFSR quot;, 1960, № 40, st. 592.
Ugolovno-protsessual nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 18.12.2001 g. № 174 -FZ (red. ot 21.10.2013): quot;Rossiyskaya gazeta quot;, № 249, 22 dekabrya 2001.
Frantsiforov YU. V. Protivorechiya mezhdu glasnost yu i taynost yu v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve: Sledovatel , № 3, 2004. S 38-44.
Isaeva R.M., Kutsenko S.M. Formal nye i pravovye osnovaniya zaderzhaniya litsa, podozrevaemogo v sovershenii prestupleniya // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. - 2013. - №2.
Apostolova N. N. TSelesoobraznost (diskretsionnost ) v rossiyskom ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve: avtoref. diss. doktora yurid. nauk. M., 2011;
Boykov A. D. K voprosu o glasnosti pravosudiya: Mirovoy sud ya, № 2, 2010;
Gorbuz A. Dostupnost sudebnogo resheniya: Rossiyskaya yustitsiya, № 1, 2001;
Kruchinin YU.S. Problemy legal nosti sbora svedeniy o kandidatakh v prisyazhnye zasedateli: Advokat, № 7, 2010;
Urgalkin A.S. Prichiny neobkhodimosti primeneniya glasnoy modeli predvaritel nogo sledstviya v Rossii: Rossiyskiy sledovatel , № 23, 2009;
Krylov A.V. Rossiyskiy opyt vzaimodeystviya sledovatelya so sredstvami massovoy informatsii (istoricheskiy aspekt): Rossiyskiy sledovatel , № 17, 2012

secret investigation, disclosure, publicity, the disclosure of data of preliminary investigation.