Problems related to the extension of the terms of the preliminary investigation in the form of an inquiry
( Pp. 322-325)
More about authors
Akhmedkhanova Samira Telkhatovna
Candidate of Legal Sciences Associate Professor of the Department of Criminal Law
North Caucasus Institute (branch) VSU (RPA of the Ministry of Justice of Russia)
Makhachkala, Dagestan Republic Mamashov Yusup Ruslanovich magistrant
North-Caucasian Institute (branch) of RSUJ (RLA of the Ministry of justice of Russia)
North Caucasus Institute (branch) VSU (RPA of the Ministry of Justice of Russia)
Makhachkala, Dagestan Republic Mamashov Yusup Ruslanovich magistrant
North-Caucasian Institute (branch) of RSUJ (RLA of the Ministry of justice of Russia)
Abstract:
The main form of preliminary investigation is an inquiry, which is a starting point for differentiating the choice of forms of preliminary investigation. Evidence of this statement is the official statistics of the number of crimes of investigation, which is carried out both in the complicated form of General inquiry, and in the simplified form-abbreviated inquiry. The vesting of the inquirer procedural autonomy is an important condition for the implementation of its functions, one of the main factors of legality, validity judgments produced by proceedings under the criminal procedure law he is given the opportunity to act independently, at its discretion, to make reasonable findings and conclusions. The investigator, within the framework of his procedural independence, can plan an independent investigation, choose tactics, effective and appropriate methods of investigation aimed at full, rapid disclosure and investigation of criminal acts. The main purpose of this study is to improve the legal framework on which the investigator bases his activities, develop proposals and recommendations to ensure independence in the production of various procedural measures of preliminary investigation.
How to Cite:
Akhmedkhanova S.T., Mamashov Y.R., (2020), PROBLEMS RELATED TO THE EXTENSION OF THE TERMS OF THE PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION IN THE FORM OF AN INQUIRY. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 5 => 322-325.
Reference list:
Собр. законодательства Рос. Федерации - 24 декабря -2001, - № 52 (ч. I), - ст. 4921
Arep eva T.A. O protsessual nykh polnomochiyakh nachal nika podrazdeleniya doznaniya s prokurorom i nachal nikom organa doznaniya/ Sbornik: evolyutsiya gosudarstva i prava. - 2017.- S. 322-324.
Arkhipov A.S. Razumnyy srok ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva kak pokazatel effektivnosti protsessual noy deyatel nosti uchastnikov storony obvineniya na stadii predvaritel nogo rassledovaniya // Voprosy sovremennoy yurisprudentsii. - 2013. - № 28. - S. 98.
Bykov V.M. Novyy zakon o razumnom sroke ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva // Zakonnost . - 2010. - № 11. Elektronnyy resurs : SPS Konsul tantPlyus .
Zaloznaya D.V. Nachal nik organa doznaniya, nachal nik podrazdeleniya doznaniya i doznavatel , aspekty pravovogo polozheniya i vzaimodeystviya/ Sbornik nauchnykh trudov SWorld. - 2012. - № 2. - S. 72-80.
Zyryanova E.E. Mesto i rol nachal nika podrazdeleniya doznaniya sredi dolzhnostnykh lits organa doznaniya/ Aktual nye problemy bor by s prestupnost yu i inymi pravonarusheniyami.- 2017.- № 17-1.- S. 123-125.
Sementsov V.A. Sledstvennye deystviya v dosudebnom proizvodstve: monografiya / V.A. Sementsov. - M.: YUrlitinform, 2017. - 254 s.
Michurina O.V., Kurash K.A. Razgranichenie protsessual noy kompetentsii nachal nika organa doznaniya i nachal nika podrazdeleniya doznaniya v sfere rukovodstva doznaniem/ moskovskiy universitet MVD Rossii imeni V.YA. Kikotya. - 2018.- S. 154-157.
Panfilets A.V., Fedorov A.B. Doznanie do doznaniya/ vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta MVD Rossii.- 2018.- № 2.- S. 14-18.
Tokareva G.S. Polnomochiya nachal nika podrazdeleniya doznaniya i ikh realizatsiya v proizvodstve sokrashchennoy formy doznaniya/ Teoriya i praktika obshchestvennogo razvitiya. - 2015.- № 3. - S. 65-66.
Arep eva T.A. O protsessual nykh polnomochiyakh nachal nika podrazdeleniya doznaniya s prokurorom i nachal nikom organa doznaniya/ Sbornik: evolyutsiya gosudarstva i prava. - 2017.- S. 322-324.
Arkhipov A.S. Razumnyy srok ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva kak pokazatel effektivnosti protsessual noy deyatel nosti uchastnikov storony obvineniya na stadii predvaritel nogo rassledovaniya // Voprosy sovremennoy yurisprudentsii. - 2013. - № 28. - S. 98.
Bykov V.M. Novyy zakon o razumnom sroke ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva // Zakonnost . - 2010. - № 11. Elektronnyy resurs : SPS Konsul tantPlyus .
Zaloznaya D.V. Nachal nik organa doznaniya, nachal nik podrazdeleniya doznaniya i doznavatel , aspekty pravovogo polozheniya i vzaimodeystviya/ Sbornik nauchnykh trudov SWorld. - 2012. - № 2. - S. 72-80.
Zyryanova E.E. Mesto i rol nachal nika podrazdeleniya doznaniya sredi dolzhnostnykh lits organa doznaniya/ Aktual nye problemy bor by s prestupnost yu i inymi pravonarusheniyami.- 2017.- № 17-1.- S. 123-125.
Sementsov V.A. Sledstvennye deystviya v dosudebnom proizvodstve: monografiya / V.A. Sementsov. - M.: YUrlitinform, 2017. - 254 s.
Michurina O.V., Kurash K.A. Razgranichenie protsessual noy kompetentsii nachal nika organa doznaniya i nachal nika podrazdeleniya doznaniya v sfere rukovodstva doznaniem/ moskovskiy universitet MVD Rossii imeni V.YA. Kikotya. - 2018.- S. 154-157.
Panfilets A.V., Fedorov A.B. Doznanie do doznaniya/ vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta MVD Rossii.- 2018.- № 2.- S. 14-18.
Tokareva G.S. Polnomochiya nachal nika podrazdeleniya doznaniya i ikh realizatsiya v proizvodstve sokrashchennoy formy doznaniya/ Teoriya i praktika obshchestvennogo razvitiya. - 2015.- № 3. - S. 65-66.
Keywords:
inquiry, preliminary investigation, disclosure, investigation, improvement, investigation.
