CRITIQUE OF A PURPOSE OF CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS INITIAL STAGE
( Pp. 155-158)
More about authors
Elena S. Papysheva
Cand. Sci. (Law), Assoc. Prof., Institute of Law
Ufa University of Science and Technology
Ufa, Russian Federation
Ufa University of Science and Technology
Ufa, Russian Federation
Abstract:
This article discusses the purpose of initiating a criminal case, its transformation at the present stage, and the position of the authors of the Concept of judicial reform in the Russian Federation in 1991 on the discrepancy of this stage with the proposed transformations, which was continued in the Roadmap for further reform of the internal affairs bodies in the form of complete refusal from the institute of criminal proceedings. The author expresses a critical position regarding the unjustified growth of the criminal process at the legislative level of this stage by expanding the list of investigative actions allowed to be carried out as part of a pre-investigation check. According to the author, the initial stage of criminal proceedings ceased to fulfill the tasks for which it was created in the Soviet period, and, on the contrary, it was unjustifiably entrusted with solving the problems of subsequent stages of criminal proceedings. The article presents the current state of the stage of initiation of a criminal case, its relationship with the proceedings on administrative offenses and their relationship. The author comes to the conclusion that it is necessary to legislatively fix the purpose of initiating a criminal case in order to comply with the basic principles of criminal proceedings.
How to Cite:
Elena S.P., (2020), CRITIQUE OF A PURPOSE OF CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS INITIAL STAGE. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 2 => 155-158.
Reference list:
Postanovlenie VS RSFSR ot 24.10.1991 N 1801-1 quot;O Kontseptsii sudebnoy reformy v RSFSR quot; // quot;Vedomosti SND i VS RSFSR quot;, N 44, 31.10.1991, st. 1435.
Dorozhnaya karta dal neyshego reformirovaniya organov vnutrennikh del Rossiyskoy Federatsii / Rossiyskaya gazeta elektronnyy resurs // URL: https://rg.ru/2013/02/04/karta-mvd-site-dok.html (data obrashcheniya 20.02.2020).
Petrukhin I.L. Teoreticheskie osnovy reformirovaniya ugolovnogo protsessa v Rossii. M., 2005. CH.II.
Krymov V.A. Nachalo proizvodstva po ugolovnomu delu: teoreticheskie i pravovye osnovy//Rossiyskiy sledovatel . 2017. №22.
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 24.03.2005 № 5 O nekotorykh voprosakh, voznikayushchikh u sudov pri primenenii Kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh . // quot;Rossiyskaya gazeta quot;, N 80, 19.04.2005.
Kurs ugolovnogo protsessa / pod red. d yu.n., prof.L.V.Golovko,-2-e izd., ispr.-M.: Statut, 2017.
Kozhokar V.V. Vozbuzhdenie ugolovnogo dela: voprosy teorii i praktiki: Avtoref. dis. kand. yurid. nauk. Moskva, 2016.
Krymov V.A. Nachalo proizvodstva po ugolovnomu delu: teoreticheskie i pravovye osnovy. Avtoref. dis. kand. yurid. nauk. Moskva, 2019.
Dorozhnaya karta dal neyshego reformirovaniya organov vnutrennikh del Rossiyskoy Federatsii / Rossiyskaya gazeta elektronnyy resurs // URL: https://rg.ru/2013/02/04/karta-mvd-site-dok.html (data obrashcheniya 20.02.2020).
Petrukhin I.L. Teoreticheskie osnovy reformirovaniya ugolovnogo protsessa v Rossii. M., 2005. CH.II.
Krymov V.A. Nachalo proizvodstva po ugolovnomu delu: teoreticheskie i pravovye osnovy//Rossiyskiy sledovatel . 2017. №22.
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 24.03.2005 № 5 O nekotorykh voprosakh, voznikayushchikh u sudov pri primenenii Kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh . // quot;Rossiyskaya gazeta quot;, N 80, 19.04.2005.
Kurs ugolovnogo protsessa / pod red. d yu.n., prof.L.V.Golovko,-2-e izd., ispr.-M.: Statut, 2017.
Kozhokar V.V. Vozbuzhdenie ugolovnogo dela: voprosy teorii i praktiki: Avtoref. dis. kand. yurid. nauk. Moskva, 2016.
Krymov V.A. Nachalo proizvodstva po ugolovnomu delu: teoreticheskie i pravovye osnovy. Avtoref. dis. kand. yurid. nauk. Moskva, 2019.
Keywords:
initiation of a criminal case, initial stages of a criminal process, refusal to initiate a criminal case, administrative case, criminal procedure legislation.