Concept, content and types of legal consequences of procedural decisions made by a prosecutor in the course of pre-trial proceedings
( Pp. 335-340)

The article covers legal consequences of procedural decisions made by a prosecutor in the course of pre-trial proceedings in the Russian Federation as part of fulfilling their duties. Task and goal. For the author of this article, key tasks and goals are analysis of legal consequences of procedural decisions made by a prosecutor at pre-trial stages of criminal proceedings from the point of view of creation, modification and termination of legal relations resulting from such procedural activities of a prosecutor, definition of the content of legal consequences, suggesting classification of legal consequences by category, and suggesting unique definition of legal consequences of procedural decisions made by a prosecutor in the course of pre-trial proceedings General scientific and special methods such as comparative/legal and systemic/structural form the methodological basis. Conclusions Content and essence of legal consequences of procedural decisions made by a prosecutor in the course of pre-trial proceedings have been analysed, and their classification and unique definition, according to which those are legal facts that are entailed by modification and termination of legal relations between participants of criminal proceedings, resulting from adoption of procedural decisions that meet requirements to legality, relevancy and motivation by a prosecutor during prosecutor’s supervision over preliminary investigation bodies in the course of pre-trial proceedings, have been suggested. Possibility of further use of the results of the work The conducted research relating to the meaning of legal consequences of procedural decisions made by a prosecutor at pre-trial stages of criminal proceedings and suggested definition allow studying the above procedural decisions made by the prosecutor by content and meaning in the criminal proceedings and their effect on achievement of a goal of criminal proceedings from the point of view of creation, modification and termination of legal relations in this area. The conclusions can be used for wording suggestions for amendment of criminal procedural laws and administrative regulatory documents of the Prosecutor General’s Office of the Russian Federation and other authorities. Practical meaning Interrogators, investigators, prosecutors, judges may use the results of the work in their current activities, while making procedural decisions as many theses are applicable for the majority of procedural decision. Value The practical application of the results of research is dependent on achievement of a goal of criminal proceedings.

Sindeev A.Y., (2018), CONCEPT, CONTENT AND TYPES OF LEGAL CONSEQUENCES OF PROCEDURAL DECISIONS MADE BY A PROSECUTOR IN THE COURSE OF PRE-TRIAL PROCEEDINGS. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 4 => 335-340.

Alekseev S.S. Obshchaya teoriya sotsialisticheskogo prava: Kurs lektsiy. Vyp. 4. Sverdlovsk, 1964, Teoriya gosudarstva i prava: Ucheb. / Pod red. A.S. Pigolkina, YU.A. Dmitrieva. 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. M.: YUrayt, 2010;
Bakhta A.S. O prirode ugolovno - protsessual nykh resheniy//Rossiyskiy sledovatel . 2011. № 15;
Belova G.D., ZHuk O.D., Isaenko V.N., KHaliulin A.G. i dr. Prokurorskiy nadzor za protsessual noy deyatel nost yu organov doznaniya i organov predvaritel nogo sledstviya M. 2006;
Gus kova A.P., Muratova N.G. Sudebnoe pravo: istoriya i sovremennost sudebnoy vlasti v sfere ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva.: Monografiya. M, YUrist. 2005;
ZHubrin R.V. Problemy teorii i praktiki prokurorskogo nadzora za ispolneniem zakonov pri rassledovanii nezakonnogo predprinimatel stva. Diss. kandidata yurid. nauk. M. 2004;
Ivanov A.L. Zashchita prokurorom konstitutsionnykh prav cheloveka i grazhdanina//Zakonnost . 2010.№ 9;
Kapinus K.V. Prokurorskiy nadzor za ispolneniem zakonov pri razreshenii zayavleniy i soobshcheniy o prestupleniyakh. Diss. kand. yurid. nauk. M. 2004;
Krasavchikov O.A. YUridicheskie fakty v sovetskom grazhdanskom prave M., 1958;
Leonov S.G. Vidy i klassifikatsiya ugolovno-protsessual nykh resheniy kak yuridicheskikh faktov v dosudebnom proizvodstve//Obshchestvo i pravo.2010. № 2;
Lupinskaya P.A. Resheniya v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve: teoriya, zakonodatel stvo, praktika (2-e izd., pererab. i dop.) M., Norma, Infra-M, 2010;
Ryabtsev V.P., Solov ev A.B., YAstrebov V.B. i dr. Nastol naya kniga prokurora. NII problem ukrepleniya zakonnosti i pravoporyadka. M. 2002.
Safonov A.P. Bor ba s retsidivom prestupleniy sredstvami prokurorskogo nadzora. M., 1977;
Nakaz Ministra yustitsii General-prokurora chinam prokurorskogo nadzora sudebnykh palat i okruzhnykh sudov. SPb. 1896;
Ustav Ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva 1864 g.

legal consequences, procedural decisions, criminal case, the Prosecutor, relationship, a preliminary investigation, pre-trial proceedings, resolution, the court, the investigator, public Prosecutor's supervision, criminal procedure legislation.