The essence of state coercion
( Pp. 231-235)

In the article “The Essence of State Coercion” is investigated as a system built taking into account certain principles and structural connections between its constituent elements. The goals and objectives are identified, the content and grounds of application are analyzed, the pre-determining effect on the nature of measures of state coercion in cases of administrative offenses is substantiated. The purpose of the study is to identify and solve such problems as: analysis of scientific research materials and regulatory regulation of interaction between authorized bodies and their officials, who apply measures of influence to the subject subject, on the one hand, and those who are forced to undergo , to implement the measures applied, on the other hand, in the process of applying state-compulsory measures. Participants of state coercion as a specific protective legal relationship are endowed with relevant rights and obligations. The above allows us to consider state coercion as a method of state management, which involves the use by the competent state bodies and their officials of a psychological effect on the consciousness, will and behavior of coercive persons by implementing state coercive measures in the procedural form provided for by industry legislation entailing infringement of legal restrictions of a moral, personal, property and organizational nature, with the aim of stagnation these persons to fulfill their legal duties, in compliance with the prohibitions established by law.

Kravets I.P., (2020), THE ESSENCE OF STATE COERCION. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 1 => 231-235.

Slovar sovremennogo russkogo literaturnogo yazyka. M.; L., 1961. T. 11. S. 635.
Puchnin A.S. Prinuzhdenie i pravo: Dis.. kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2000. S. 79, 80.
Rubin O.S. Kategoriya quot;prinuzhdenie quot; v filosofsko-pravovoy sisteme Platona // Pravovaya kul tura. 2007. N 2. S. 38.
Kant I. Soch.: V 6 t. M., 1965. T. 4. CH. 2. S. 139 - 141.
Il in I.A. O protivlenii zlu siloyu // Il in I.A. Put dukhovnogo obnovleniya: raboty raznykh let. SPb., 2006. S. 394 - 396.
Aberkrombi N., KHill S., Terner B.S. Sotsiologicheskiy slovar / Pod red. S.A. Erofeeva. M., 2000. S. 242.
Matuzov N.I. Teoriya gosudarstva i prava: Kurs lektsiy / Pod red. N.I. Matuzova, A.V. Mal ko. M., 1997. S. 356.
Manokhin V.M., Adushkin YU.S. Rossiyskoe administrativnoe pravo: Uchebnik. 2-e izd. Saratov, 2003. S. 166.
Baytin M.I. Sushchnost prava (sovremennoe normativnoe pravoponimanie na grani dvukh vekov). 2-e izd. M., 2005. S. 131.
Kozyubra N.I. Ubezhdenie i prinuzhdenie v sovetskom prave na sovremennom etape kommunisticheskogo stroitel stva: Avtoref. dis.. kand. yurid. nauk. Kiev, 1968. S. 7.
Rebane I. Ubezhdenie i prinuzhdenie v dele bor by s posyagatel stvami na sovetskiy pravoporyadok // Trudy po pravovedeniyu: Uchen. zap. Tartuskogo gos. un-ta. Tartu, 1966. Vyp. 5. S. 180.
Atamanchuk G.V. Gosudarstvennoe upravlenie: problemy metodologii pravovogo issledovaniya. M., 1975. S. 111.
Alekseev S.S. Sotsial naya tsennost prava v sovetskom obshchestve. M., 1971. S. 106;
Ardashkin V.D. O prinuzhdenii po sovetskomu pravu // Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. 1970. N 7. S. 35.
Kolosova N.M. Konstitutsionnaya otvetstvennost v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: otvetstvennost organov gosudarstvennoy vlasti i inykh sub ektov prava za narushenie konstitutsionnogo zakonodatel stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii. M., 2000. S. 109 - 138.
Sattarova N.A. Prinuzhdenie v finansovom prave / Pod red. I.I. Kucherova. M., 2006. S. 23.
Bulatov B.B. Gosudarstvennoe prinuzhdenie v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve. Omsk, 2003. S. 11.
Leyst O.E. Sanktsii i otvetstvennost po sovetskomu pravu. M., 1981. S. 18.
Popkova E.S. Gosudarstvennoe i pravovoe v prinuzhdenii // Deyatel nost organov vnutrennikh del po ukrepleniyu pravoporyadka i obshchestvennoy bezopasnosti. M., 2000. S. 35 - 38.
Leyst O.E. Sanktsii i otvetstvennost po sovetskomu pravu. M., 1981. S. 23.
Kozulin A.I. Pravovoe prinuzhdenie (pravovye nachala gosudarstvennogo prinuzhdeniya v sovetskom obshchestve): Avtoref. dis.. kand. yurid. nauk. Sverdlovsk, 1986. S. 6,10.
Kaplunov A.I. Ob osnovnykh chertakh i ponyatii gosudarstvennogo prinuzhdeniya. S. 17.
SHishkina O.E. Administrativnoe prinuzhdenie v sisteme gosudarstvennogo prinuzhdeniya: aktual nye teoreticheskie i prakticheskie problemy // Pravovedenie. 2008. N 4. S. 94.
Yonash V.V. O ponyatii pravovogo prinuzhdeniya // Vestnik Saratovskoy gosudarstvennoy akademii prava. 2002. N 1. S. 68.
Seregina V.V. Gosudarstvennoe prinuzhdenie po sovetskomu pravu. Voronezh, 1991. S. 20.
Makiavelli N. Gosudar . M., 2000. S. 235.
Studenikina M.S. Sootnoshenie administrativnogo prinuzhdeniya i administrativnoy otvetstvennosti // Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. 1968. N 10. S. 22.
Alekseev S.S. Obshchaya teoriya prava: Kurs: V 2 t. M., 1981. T. 1. S. 269 - 270.
Popkova E.S. YUridicheskaya otvetstvennost i ee sootnoshenie s inymi pravovymi formami gosudarstvennogo prinuzhdeniya: Avtoref. dis.. kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2001. S. 11.
Kaplunov A.I. Ob osnovnykh chertakh i ponyatii gosudarstvennogo prinuzhdeniya. S. 14.
Bakhrakh D.N. Sovetskoe zakonodatel stvo ob administrativnoy otvetstvennosti: Ucheb. posobie. Perm , 1969. S. 16.
Alekseev S.S. Obshchaya teoriya prava: Kurs: V 2 t. M., 1981. T. 1. S. 268, 269.
Leyst O.E. Sanktsii i otvetstvennost po sovetskomu pravu. M., 1981. S. 19.

Constitution of the Russian Federation, Code of the Russian Federation on administrative offenses, state enforcement, administrative coercion.