Legal regulation of the status of an expert in criminal proceedings in the Russian Federation
( Pp. 156-159)
More about authors
Tolgurova Zukhra Khuseinovna
kand. ekon. nauk, docent kafedry specialnyh disciplin
North Caucasus Institute for Advanced Studies (branch) of the Krasnodar University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia
Nalchik, Russia Lilia Y. Taova Cand.Sci. (Law), Associate Professor of the Department of Special Disciplines, Police Colonel, Russia
North Caucasus Institute for Advanced Studies (branch) of the Krasnodar University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia; Nalchik; Nalchik; Friendship University of Russia
; Russia North Caucasus Institute for Advanced Studies (branch) of the Krasnodar University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia; Russia Peoples' Moscow, Russia
North Caucasus Institute for Advanced Studies (branch) of the Krasnodar University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia
Nalchik, Russia Lilia Y. Taova Cand.Sci. (Law), Associate Professor of the Department of Special Disciplines, Police Colonel, Russia
North Caucasus Institute for Advanced Studies (branch) of the Krasnodar University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia; Nalchik; Nalchik; Friendship University of Russia
; Russia North Caucasus Institute for Advanced Studies (branch) of the Krasnodar University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia; Russia Peoples' Moscow, Russia
Abstract:
In this article, the authors consider the procedure for involving an expert as a participant in criminal proceedings at the stage of preliminary investigation and trial. The involvement of an expert as a participant in the criminal process is not necessary for every stage of the consideration of the case, however, this participant plays a key role when considering controversial issues and allows you to bring the truth into the criminal case. By examining the conclusions given in the expert's opinion, it is possible to establish the person's attitude to the crime committed, even if there is no other evidence in the criminal case. When an expert is involved in a criminal process, there is a procedural procedure for such involvement, as well as a form for formalizing the results obtained from an expert, which is an “expert opinion”. When drawing up the expert opinion itself, there are also rules and features that are regulated by the research production methods. This is the subject of this article. In addition, it is worth finding out who can be involved as an expert, what documents must confirm the status of an expert and in which departments the activities of expert services are organized. Objective: - study of a legal issue related to the involvement of an expert in the process of criminal proceedings, with the possibility of further use of the data obtained when making a final decision in a criminal case. Work tasks: - studying the concept of "expert" to establish the limits of participation in criminal proceedings; - study of the norms of criminal procedural law governing the involvement of an expert as a participant in criminal proceedings; - Consideration of issues within the competence of an expert and registration of the results of involving an expert in criminal proceedings.
How to Cite:
Tolgurova Z.K., Lilia Y.T., (2020), LEGAL REGULATION OF THE STATUS OF AN EXPERT IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 6 => 156-159.
Reference list:
Konstitutsiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii (Prinyata vsenarodnym golosovaniem 12 dekabrya 1993 goda s izmeneniyami, odobrennymi v khode obshcherossiyskogo golosovaniya 1 iyulya 2020 goda), (s uchetom popravok, vnesennykh Zakonami RF o popravkakh k Konstitutsii RF ot 30.12.2008 g. № 6-FKZ, ot 30.12.2008 g. № 7-FKZ, ot 05.02.2014 g. № 2-FKZ, ot 21.07.2014 g. № 11-FKZ) // SZ RF. 2014. № 31. St. 4398.
Ugolovnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 13.06.1996 g. № 63-FZ (red. ot 31.07.2020) // SZ RF. 1996. № 25. St. 2954.
Ugolovno-protsessual nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 18.12.2001 g. № 174-FZ (red. ot 31.07.2020) // SZ RF. 2001. № 52 (CH. 1). St. 4921.
Prikaz MVD Rossii ot 29.06.2005 N 511 (red. ot 27.06.2019) quot;Voprosy organizatsii proizvodstva sudebnykh ekspertiz v ekspertno-kriminalisticheskikh podrazdeleniyakh organov vnutrennikh del Rossiyskoy Federatsii quot; (vmeste s quot;Instruktsiey po organizatsii proizvodstva sudebnykh ekspertiz v ekspertno-kriminalisti-cheskikh podrazdeleniyakh organov vnutrennikh del Rossiyskoy Federatsii quot;, quot;Perechnem rodov (vidov) sudebnykh ekspertiz, proizvodimykh v ekspertno-kriminalisticheskikh podrazdeleniyakh organov vnutrennikh del Rossiyskoy Federatsii quot;) (Zaregistrirovano v Minyuste Rossii 23.08.2005 N 6931) Elektronnyy resurs . SPS Konsul tant plyus.
Komisarova YA.V. Diskussionnye aspekty regulirovaniya ekspertnoy deyatel nosti na sovremennom etape. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Pravo. 2012. S.14.
Lazareva T.S. Osobennosti pravovogo statusa lits, obladayushchikh spetsial nymi znaniyami v ugolovnom protsesse. Mezhdunarodnyy zhurnal gumanitarnykh i estestvennykh nauk. 2020. 2-2 (41). S. 139.
Lukoshkina S.V. K voprosu o pravovom statuse spetsialista v Rossiyskom ugolovnom sudoproizodstve. Sibirskie ugolovno-protsessual nye i kriminalisticheskie chteniya. 2019.
Sergeeva O.S. K voprosu o razgranichenii funktsiy eksperta i spetsialista v ugolovnom protsesse. Sibirskie ugolovno-protsessual nye i kriminalisticheskie chteniya. 2016.
Treshcheva E.A. Pravovoe regulirovaniya statusa eksperta v sudebnom protsesse (ugolovnom, grazhdanskom i arbitrazhnom protsessakh). Samara. 2013 Elektronnyy resurs . URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/pravovoe-regulirovanie-statusa-eksperta-v-sudebnom-protsesse-v-ugolovnom-grazhdanskom-i-arbitrazhnom-protsessah/ viewer.
CHernogor N.N., Zoloilo M.V. Ekspertiza v pravotvorchestve: problemy pravovogo regulirovaniya i voprosy ego sovershenstvovaniya. YUridicheskaya nauka i praktika: Vestnik Nizhegorodskoy akademii MVD Rossii. S. 100.
Ugolovnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 13.06.1996 g. № 63-FZ (red. ot 31.07.2020) // SZ RF. 1996. № 25. St. 2954.
Ugolovno-protsessual nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 18.12.2001 g. № 174-FZ (red. ot 31.07.2020) // SZ RF. 2001. № 52 (CH. 1). St. 4921.
Prikaz MVD Rossii ot 29.06.2005 N 511 (red. ot 27.06.2019) quot;Voprosy organizatsii proizvodstva sudebnykh ekspertiz v ekspertno-kriminalisticheskikh podrazdeleniyakh organov vnutrennikh del Rossiyskoy Federatsii quot; (vmeste s quot;Instruktsiey po organizatsii proizvodstva sudebnykh ekspertiz v ekspertno-kriminalisti-cheskikh podrazdeleniyakh organov vnutrennikh del Rossiyskoy Federatsii quot;, quot;Perechnem rodov (vidov) sudebnykh ekspertiz, proizvodimykh v ekspertno-kriminalisticheskikh podrazdeleniyakh organov vnutrennikh del Rossiyskoy Federatsii quot;) (Zaregistrirovano v Minyuste Rossii 23.08.2005 N 6931) Elektronnyy resurs . SPS Konsul tant plyus.
Komisarova YA.V. Diskussionnye aspekty regulirovaniya ekspertnoy deyatel nosti na sovremennom etape. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Pravo. 2012. S.14.
Lazareva T.S. Osobennosti pravovogo statusa lits, obladayushchikh spetsial nymi znaniyami v ugolovnom protsesse. Mezhdunarodnyy zhurnal gumanitarnykh i estestvennykh nauk. 2020. 2-2 (41). S. 139.
Lukoshkina S.V. K voprosu o pravovom statuse spetsialista v Rossiyskom ugolovnom sudoproizodstve. Sibirskie ugolovno-protsessual nye i kriminalisticheskie chteniya. 2019.
Sergeeva O.S. K voprosu o razgranichenii funktsiy eksperta i spetsialista v ugolovnom protsesse. Sibirskie ugolovno-protsessual nye i kriminalisticheskie chteniya. 2016.
Treshcheva E.A. Pravovoe regulirovaniya statusa eksperta v sudebnom protsesse (ugolovnom, grazhdanskom i arbitrazhnom protsessakh). Samara. 2013 Elektronnyy resurs . URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/pravovoe-regulirovanie-statusa-eksperta-v-sudebnom-protsesse-v-ugolovnom-grazhdanskom-i-arbitrazhnom-protsessah/ viewer.
CHernogor N.N., Zoloilo M.V. Ekspertiza v pravotvorchestve: problemy pravovogo regulirovaniya i voprosy ego sovershenstvovaniya. YUridicheskaya nauka i praktika: Vestnik Nizhegorodskoy akademii MVD Rossii. S. 100.
Keywords:
expert, preliminary investigation, judicial investigation, expert opinion, expert interrogation, involvement of a person as an expert, confirmation of the expert's status.
