Legal regulation of the status of an expert in criminal proceedings in the Russian Federation
( Pp. 156-159)

More about authors
Tolgurova Zukhra Khuseinovna kand. ekon. nauk, docent kafedry specialnyh disciplin
North Caucasus Institute for Advanced Studies (branch) of the Krasnodar University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia
Nalchik, Russia Taova Lilia Yurievna Cand.Sci.(Law), Police Colonel, Associate Professor of the Department of Special Disciplines
North Caucasus Institute for Advanced Studies (branch) of the Krasnodar University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia
Nalchik, Russia
Abstract:
In this article, the authors consider the procedure for involving an expert as a participant in criminal proceedings at the stage of preliminary investigation and trial. The involvement of an expert as a participant in the criminal process is not necessary for every stage of the consideration of the case, however, this participant plays a key role when considering controversial issues and allows you to bring the truth into the criminal case. By examining the conclusions given in the expert's opinion, it is possible to establish the person's attitude to the crime committed, even if there is no other evidence in the criminal case. When an expert is involved in a criminal process, there is a procedural procedure for such involvement, as well as a form for formalizing the results obtained from an expert, which is an “expert opinion”. When drawing up the expert opinion itself, there are also rules and features that are regulated by the research production methods. This is the subject of this article. In addition, it is worth finding out who can be involved as an expert, what documents must confirm the status of an expert and in which departments the activities of expert services are organized. Objective: - study of a legal issue related to the involvement of an expert in the process of criminal proceedings, with the possibility of further use of the data obtained when making a final decision in a criminal case. Work tasks: - studying the concept of "expert" to establish the limits of participation in criminal proceedings; - study of the norms of criminal procedural law governing the involvement of an expert as a participant in criminal proceedings; - Consideration of issues within the competence of an expert and registration of the results of involving an expert in criminal proceedings.
How to Cite:
Tolgurova Z.K., Taova L.Y., (2020), LEGAL REGULATION OF THE STATUS OF AN EXPERT IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 6 => 156-159.
Reference list:
Konstitutsiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii (Prinyata vsenarodnym golosovaniem 12 dekabrya 1993 goda s izmeneniyami, odobrennymi v khode obshcherossiyskogo golosovaniya 1 iyulya 2020 goda), (s uchetom popravok, vnesennykh Zakonami RF o popravkakh k Konstitutsii RF ot 30.12.2008 g. № 6-FKZ, ot 30.12.2008 g. № 7-FKZ, ot 05.02.2014 g. № 2-FKZ, ot 21.07.2014 g. № 11-FKZ) // SZ RF. 2014. № 31. St. 4398.
Ugolovnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 13.06.1996 g. № 63-FZ (red. ot 31.07.2020) // SZ RF. 1996. № 25. St. 2954.
Ugolovno-protsessual nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 18.12.2001 g. № 174-FZ (red. ot 31.07.2020) // SZ RF. 2001. № 52 (CH. 1). St. 4921.
Prikaz MVD Rossii ot 29.06.2005 N 511 (red. ot 27.06.2019) quot;Voprosy organizatsii proizvodstva sudebnykh ekspertiz v ekspertno-kriminalisticheskikh podrazdeleniyakh organov vnutrennikh del Rossiyskoy Federatsii quot; (vmeste s quot;Instruktsiey po organizatsii proizvodstva sudebnykh ekspertiz v ekspertno-kriminalisti-cheskikh podrazdeleniyakh organov vnutrennikh del Rossiyskoy Federatsii quot;, quot;Perechnem rodov (vidov) sudebnykh ekspertiz, proizvodimykh v ekspertno-kriminalisticheskikh podrazdeleniyakh organov vnutrennikh del Rossiyskoy Federatsii quot;) (Zaregistrirovano v Minyuste Rossii 23.08.2005 N 6931) Elektronnyy resurs . SPS Konsul tant plyus.
Komisarova YA.V. Diskussionnye aspekty regulirovaniya ekspertnoy deyatel nosti na sovremennom etape. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Pravo. 2012. S.14.
Lazareva T.S. Osobennosti pravovogo statusa lits, obladayushchikh spetsial nymi znaniyami v ugolovnom protsesse. Mezhdunarodnyy zhurnal gumanitarnykh i estestvennykh nauk. 2020. 2-2 (41). S. 139.
Lukoshkina S.V. K voprosu o pravovom statuse spetsialista v Rossiyskom ugolovnom sudoproizodstve. Sibirskie ugolovno-protsessual nye i kriminalisticheskie chteniya. 2019.
Sergeeva O.S. K voprosu o razgranichenii funktsiy eksperta i spetsialista v ugolovnom protsesse. Sibirskie ugolovno-protsessual nye i kriminalisticheskie chteniya. 2016.
Treshcheva E.A. Pravovoe regulirovaniya statusa eksperta v sudebnom protsesse (ugolovnom, grazhdanskom i arbitrazhnom protsessakh). Samara. 2013 Elektronnyy resurs . URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/pravovoe-regulirovanie-statusa-eksperta-v-sudebnom-protsesse-v-ugolovnom-grazhdanskom-i-arbitrazhnom-protsessah/ viewer.
CHernogor N.N., Zoloilo M.V. Ekspertiza v pravotvorchestve: problemy pravovogo regulirovaniya i voprosy ego sovershenstvovaniya. YUridicheskaya nauka i praktika: Vestnik Nizhegorodskoy akademii MVD Rossii. S. 100.
Keywords:
expert, preliminary investigation, judicial investigation, expert opinion, expert interrogation, involvement of a person as an expert, confirmation of the expert's status.


Related Articles

CRIMINALISTIC, PROCEDURAL AND OPERATIVE-SEARCH MEASURES TO COUNTER CRIME IN THE GLOBALIZATION CONDITIONS Pages: 19-23 Issue №23752
On the Question of the Procedural Independence of the Investigator in the Criminal Process
procedural independence preliminary investigation investigator powers legal status.
Show more
13. FORENSICS; FORENSIC EXPERTISE; OPERATIONAL AND SEARCH ACTIVITIES (12.00.12) Pages: 270-276 DOI: 10.33693/2072-3164-2021-14-3-270-276 Issue №18933
Conceptual Foundations of the Private Theory of Forensic Economic Expertise
specialist participation specialized knowledge forensic activity preliminary research specialist consultation
Show more
8. Forensics; Forensic expertise; Operational and search activities Pages: 168-171 Issue №5215
ABOUT ACTIVITY OF THE NON-STATE JUDICIAL AND EXPERT ESTABLISHMENTS IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION
forensic examination it is judicial-expert establishment expert certification competence
Show more
10. CRIMINAL LAW AND CRIMINOLOGY; CRIMINAL ENFORCEMENT LAW 12.00.08 Pages: 265-268 Issue №18758
Integration of digital technologies into preliminary investigations: problems, forecasts
informatization and digitalization digital technologies preliminary investigation investigative actions law enforcement
Show more
12. Forensics; Forensic expertise; Operational and search activities; Criminal procedure Pages: 215-218 Issue №6841
ABOUT IMPROVEMENT OF LEGAL REGULATION OF JUDICIAL AND EXPERT ACTIVITY IN THE SPHERE OF FORENSIC MEDICINE
special knowledge forensic organization a forensic examination expert certification
Show more
9. JUDICIAL, PROSECUTORIAL, HUMAN RIGHTS AND LAW ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITIES (12.00.11) Pages: 242-247 Issue №17401
Conceptual framework for the use of computer technologies by the prosecution authorities in assessing expert opinions
computer technology conceptual foundations prosecutor’s supervision pre-trial proceedings expert opinion
Show more
8. CRIMINAL LAW (5.1.4.) Pages: 256-260 Issue №20974
Reasoning About the Stages and Time Frames of the Preliminary Investigation Stage
pre-trial proceedings preliminary investigation preliminary investigation inquiry terms of preliminary investigation
Show more
10. FORENSICS; FORENSIC EXPERTISE; OPERATIONAL AND SEARCH ACTIVITIES (12.00.12) Pages: 260-264 Issue №17401
Content of individual actions preceding psychophysiological investigation using polygraph
polygraph psychophysiological research stages initiator occasion
Show more
6. CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Pages: 235-237 Issue №16680
Features of the use of special psychological knowledge in criminal proceedings
psychologist psychological knowledge criminal process examination suspect
Show more
17. Judicial, prosecutorial, human rights and law enforcement activities Pages: 206-210 Issue №11645
EVALUATION OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE POWERS OF THE PROSECUTOR IN THE CONCEPT OF THEIR DOCTRINAL MODEL
activities authority the Prosecutor the act of response satisfaction
Show more