Interests of owners in the norms of obligation law
( Pp. 58-62)
More about authors
Ryzhik Andrey Vladimirovich
Dr.Sci.(Law), Professor of the Department of Civil and Entrepreneurial Law, Moscow, Russia, Associate Professor, Department of Jurisprudence; Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, Smolensk branch; Smolensk, Russia
Russian State Academy of Intellectual Property
Moscow, Russia Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, Smolensk branch, Smolensk, Russia
Russian State Academy of Intellectual Property
Moscow, Russia Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, Smolensk branch, Smolensk, Russia
Abstract:
Abstract: The article discusses issues related to participants in obligatory legal relations, an authorized person (interested owner) who has the right to demand from the obligated person the proper fulfillment of contractual obligations assumed, and in case of failure to fulfill them, to apply to the court for appropriate judicial protection.
As a result of causing tortious harm or illegal enrichment, the injured person becomes empowered and interested in demanding from the offender (the obligated person) the implementation of certain positive actions to compensate for damage, restore the original position, and return what was illegally obtained and/or saved.
As a result of causing tortious harm or illegal enrichment, the injured person becomes empowered and interested in demanding from the offender (the obligated person) the implementation of certain positive actions to compensate for damage, restore the original position, and return what was illegally obtained and/or saved.
How to Cite:
Ryzhik A.V. Interests of owners in the norms of obligation law // Gaps in Russian Legislation. 2023. Vol. 16. №6. Pp. 058-062. (in Russ.). EDN: GOORNH
Reference list:
Alexandrov N.G. Law and legality during the period of extensive construction of communism. M., 1961. P. 227 – 228.
Kechekyan S.F. Legal relations in a socialist society. M., 1958. P. 60.
Sinaisky V.I. Russian civil law. M., 2002. P. 308 – 309, 330 – 331.
Shershenevich G.F. Textbook of Russian civil law. Vol. 2. M.: Statute, 2005. P. 69.
Novitsky I.B., Lunts L.A. General doctrine of obligation. M., 1950. P. 94 – 97.
Novitskiy I.B., Lunts L.A. Obshchee uchenie ob obyazatel stve. M., 1950. S. 94 97.
Kechekyan S.F. Legal relations in a socialist society. M., 1958. P. 60.
Sinaisky V.I. Russian civil law. M., 2002. P. 308 – 309, 330 – 331.
Shershenevich G.F. Textbook of Russian civil law. Vol. 2. M.: Statute, 2005. P. 69.
Novitsky I.B., Lunts L.A. General doctrine of obligation. M., 1950. P. 94 – 97.
Novitskiy I.B., Lunts L.A. Obshchee uchenie ob obyazatel stve. M., 1950. S. 94 97.
Keywords:
protection, law, interest, constitution, civil code, owner, procedure, legal institution, state..
