On the Legal Nature of the Relationship of the Head with the Organization Headed by Him (Legal Entity)
( Pp. 53-62)

Abstract: In the article the subject of the study is relationship arising in the field of labour between the head of the organization and the legal entity (organization), the relevance of which is connected with the desire of the legislator to regulate their civil law, in this connection, there is no clear position on the issue of the branch ownership of these relations at the legislative level, which gave rise to a discussion in legal science about the legal nature of the said relations between scholars-laborers and civilists. The paper analyzes the norms of Chapter 43 of the Labour Code of the Russian Federation, which establish the features of labour regulation of the head of the organization, which unequivocally showed that the relations under study have a labour law character. Therefore, they were regulated only by the norms of labour legislation, which continued until the adoption of the Federal Law of the Russian Federation of May 5, 2014 No. 99-FZ, which changed the situation in this matter. Relations between the noted subjects began to be coordinated by civil law, but the authors don’t agree with such an unreasonable understanding of their legal nature, since the legislator completely ignored the basic principles of labor law, the legal status of the head of the organization, the norms of Art. 11 of the Labour Code of the Russian Federation, etc., which generally excludes the possibility of applying civil law to labour relations. The novelty of the study lies in the fact that the conclusion about the recognition of the untenable legislative concept of the sectoral affiliation of the relations under consideration is made on the basis of studying the essence of the legal category «labour function», which is the key to resolve the current negative situation associated with their regulation by the norms of labour and civil legislation. The authors’ special contribution to the study of this topic should be considered the specific measures proposed to improve the norms of these branches of law, which will eliminate the legal nonsense resulting from the application by the legislator of the unacceptable in law simultaneous regulation of relations between the head and the organization headed by him by absolutely non-identical norms of labour and civil law.

Savin V.T., Savin S.V., (2023), ON THE LEGAL NATURE OF THE RELATIONSHIP OF THE HEAD WITH THE ORGANIZATION HEADED BY HIM (LEGAL ENTITY). Gaps in Russian Legislation, 3 => 53-62.

Agarkov M. Subject and system of Soviet civil law // Soviet state and law. 1940. No. 8-9.
Akopov D. Legal regulation of labor of heads of organizations under the new Labor Code of the Russian Federation // Economy and law. 2002. N 9. p. 100.
Braginsky M. I. On the place of civil law in the system «pub law-personal - private law» // Problems of modern civil law. Collection of articles / ed. V. N. Litovkin, V. A. Rakhmilovich. M.: Gorodets, 2000. p. 46.
Bratus S. N. Legal responsibility and legality. M., 1976. pp. 152-159.
Varshavsky K. M. Labor law of the USSR. L., 1924. pp. 10-14.
Glazyrin V. V. Regulation of labor relations: expansion of civil legislation? // Journal of Russian Law. 1998. No. 7. pp. 12-19.
Civil law / edited by Yu. K. Tolstoy, A. P. Sergeev Ch. 1. St. Petersburg, 1996. p. 13.
Gutnikov O. V. Legal responsibility in corporate relations // Bulletin of Civil Law. 2014. No. 6. pp. 51-117.
Dmitriev M. The Russian labor market is strong by non-compliance with laws // Expert. 1998. No. 5.
Zaitseva L. V. Transformation of the material responsibility of the head of a legal entity into civil liability // Lawyer. 2015. No. 22. pp. 19-22.
Zaitseva O. B. The head of the organization as a subject of labor law. M., 2013. pp. 36-39.
Korablina O. V. Legal mechanisms for identifying distinctive features of labor and civil legal relations // Humanitarian studies. 2013. No. 1 (45). pp. 131-138.
Kurennoy A.M., Mavrin S. P., Khokhlov E. B. Modern problems of Russian labor law // Jurisprudence. 1997. No. 2. pp. 19-40.
Makovskaya A. A. Grounds and amount of liability of the managers of a joint-stock company for losses caused to the company // Losses and the practice of their compensation. Collection of articles / ed. by M. A. Rozhkova. M., 2006. p. 335.
Mogilevsky S. D. Limited Liability Company. M., 2010. p. 342.
Nurtdinova A. F., Chikanova L. A. Correlation of labor and new civil legislation. The New Civil Code and industry legislation. M., 1995. p. 121.
Pashin V. M. The legal status of the sole executive body of a business company: an imaginary conflict of civil and labor law // Legislation. 2006. No.5. p. 33-37.
Rakhmilovich V. A. On illegality as the basis of civil liability // The Soviet state and law. 1964. No. 3. pp. 54-56.
Sannikova L. V. Problems of legal regulation of employment relations (civil aspect): abstract. cand. dis. Tomsk, 1996. pp. 3, 6, 8, 12.
Syrovatskaya L. A., Zaitseva O. B. On the legal regulation of labor of executive managers of joint-stock companies // Man and labor. No. 10. 1998. pp. 76-78.
Labor Law of Russia: Textbook. 2nd ed. / Ed. Yu. P. Orlovsky, A. F. Nurtdinova. M., 2008. p. 145.
Khokhlov E. B. Legal regulation of labor in modern conditions: dis. ... doct. jurid. Nauk. SPb., 1992. pp. 390-391.
Cheparina O. A. On the question of the legal nature of relations related to the management of a legal entity // Bulletin of Economics, Law and Sociology. 2019. No. 4. pp. 143-146.
Shitkina I. S. Separate problems of legal regulation of education and activity of the sole executive body // Economy and law. 2011. No. 4. pp.3-18.

employee, head of the organization, norms of labor law, norms of civil law, labor function of the head, labor-legal nature, organization..