SOME INDIVIDUAL ASPECTS OF INTERDISCIPLINARY UNDERSTANDING OF EQUITY (JUSTICE) CATEGORY
( Pp. 128-132)
More about authors
Dekhanov Sergey Aleksandrovich
Dr.Sci.(Law), Associate Professor, Professor of the civil law and procedure Department; Professor of the civil law Department
Moscow State University for the Humanities and Economics; Russian Customs Academy
Moscow, Russisn Federation; Lyubertsy, Russian Federation Dekhanova Natalia Gennadievna Cand.Sci. (Sociology), Associate Professor, Faculty of Sociology
Lomonosov Moscow State University (MSU)
Moscow, Russisn Federation
Moscow State University for the Humanities and Economics; Russian Customs Academy
Moscow, Russisn Federation; Lyubertsy, Russian Federation Dekhanova Natalia Gennadievna Cand.Sci. (Sociology), Associate Professor, Faculty of Sociology
Lomonosov Moscow State University (MSU)
Moscow, Russisn Federation
Abstract:
Purpose. Experience research of the interdisciplinary understanding of equity (justice) category. Methodology. Authors were applied general - philosophical, concrete - sociological and private - legal cognition methods of the research object. Results. There are considered issues of formation and development of the category of equity, analyzed features views of the ancient Greeks and Romans on the idea of equity, examined the work of classical and contemporary philosophers, sociologists and lawyers, considered the validity of a position of honesty and equality and explored the development of the phenomenon of social (political) justice in the article. Novelty/originality/value. The article contains the author's generalizations and conclusions that have scientific novelty and directed towards the development of theoretical positions multidisciplinary estimation of equity (justice) category.
How to Cite:
Dekhanov S.A., Dekhanova N.G., (2016), SOME INDIVIDUAL ASPECTS OF INTERDISCIPLINARY UNDERSTANDING OF EQUITY (JUSTICE) CATEGORY. Sociopolitical Sciences, 2 => 128-132.
Reference list:
Berman G.Dzh. Zapadnaya traditsiya prava: epokha formirovaniya. M.: Izd-vo MGU, 1998.
Gobbs. Leviafan. M.: Mysl . 1991.
Gorshkov M.K. Obshchestvennye neravenstva kak ob ekt sotsiologicheskogo analiza//http://socis.isras.ru/files/File/2014/2014 7/Gorshkov.pdf
Dekhanov S.A. Advokatura, grazhdanskoe obshchestvo, gosudarstvo/ Advokat. 2004, № 12.
Dekhanov S.A., Dekhanova N.G. Sootnoshenie sudebnoy vlasti i pravosudiya v pravovom gosudarstve / Zakonodatel stvo i ekonomika. 2012, № 12.
Kant I. Sobranie sochineniy v vos mi tomakh. T.4. Kritika prakticheskogo razuma. Izdatel stvo CHoro .1994.
Konstitutsiya Federativnoy Respubliki Braziliya// Konstitutsii zarubezhnykh stran. M.: Izd-vo BEK, 2000.
Kropotkin P.A. Etika. M.: Izdatel stvo politicheskoy literatury. 1991.
Krylova E.G. Doktrina ravenstva v konstitutsionnom zakonodatel stve: problemy realizatsii// Sotsial no-politicheskie nauki, 2015, №4.
Lebon G. Psikhologiya narodov i mass. Spb., 1995.
Lepeshko B.M. Pravovaya traditsiya i problema tsennostey // Sotsial no-politicheskie nauki, 2013, № 3.
Rolz Dzh. Spravedlivost kak chestnost // Spravedlivost kak chestnost . Logos, 1 (52), 2006. S. 35-60. http://vk.com/doc195058859 149403494 hash 14617b2db7eaeed62b dl 5b39ce5f364e8e5c8e
Sotsial noe neravenstvo: vzglyad OESR. Focus on Inequality and Growth/ Embargo: 9 December 2014/ http://www.oecd.org/els/soc/Focus-Inequality-and-Growth-2014
Federal naya konstitutsiya SHveytsarskoy konfederatsii // Konstitutsii zarubezhnykh stran. M.: Izd-vo BEK, 2000.
SHopengauer A. Sobranie sochineniy: V 6 tt.T.1. Mir kak volya i predstavlenie. M.: TERRA- Knizhnyy klub; Respublika,1999.
Ekimov A.I. Pravo v kontekste spravedlivosti: k metodologii issledovaniya// Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedeniy. Pravovedenie. 2013, № 2 (307).
YUm D. Traktat o chelovecheskoy prirode // YUm D. Soch. V 2-kh t. T. 1. M.: Mysl , 1996// http://r-e-e-d.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/34 hume propertyandlaw.pdf
Gobbs. Leviafan. M.: Mysl . 1991.
Gorshkov M.K. Obshchestvennye neravenstva kak ob ekt sotsiologicheskogo analiza//http://socis.isras.ru/files/File/2014/2014 7/Gorshkov.pdf
Dekhanov S.A. Advokatura, grazhdanskoe obshchestvo, gosudarstvo/ Advokat. 2004, № 12.
Dekhanov S.A., Dekhanova N.G. Sootnoshenie sudebnoy vlasti i pravosudiya v pravovom gosudarstve / Zakonodatel stvo i ekonomika. 2012, № 12.
Kant I. Sobranie sochineniy v vos mi tomakh. T.4. Kritika prakticheskogo razuma. Izdatel stvo CHoro .1994.
Konstitutsiya Federativnoy Respubliki Braziliya// Konstitutsii zarubezhnykh stran. M.: Izd-vo BEK, 2000.
Kropotkin P.A. Etika. M.: Izdatel stvo politicheskoy literatury. 1991.
Krylova E.G. Doktrina ravenstva v konstitutsionnom zakonodatel stve: problemy realizatsii// Sotsial no-politicheskie nauki, 2015, №4.
Lebon G. Psikhologiya narodov i mass. Spb., 1995.
Lepeshko B.M. Pravovaya traditsiya i problema tsennostey // Sotsial no-politicheskie nauki, 2013, № 3.
Rolz Dzh. Spravedlivost kak chestnost // Spravedlivost kak chestnost . Logos, 1 (52), 2006. S. 35-60. http://vk.com/doc195058859 149403494 hash 14617b2db7eaeed62b dl 5b39ce5f364e8e5c8e
Sotsial noe neravenstvo: vzglyad OESR. Focus on Inequality and Growth/ Embargo: 9 December 2014/ http://www.oecd.org/els/soc/Focus-Inequality-and-Growth-2014
Federal naya konstitutsiya SHveytsarskoy konfederatsii // Konstitutsii zarubezhnykh stran. M.: Izd-vo BEK, 2000.
SHopengauer A. Sobranie sochineniy: V 6 tt.T.1. Mir kak volya i predstavlenie. M.: TERRA- Knizhnyy klub; Respublika,1999.
Ekimov A.I. Pravo v kontekste spravedlivosti: k metodologii issledovaniya// Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedeniy. Pravovedenie. 2013, № 2 (307).
YUm D. Traktat o chelovecheskoy prirode // YUm D. Soch. V 2-kh t. T. 1. M.: Mysl , 1996// http://r-e-e-d.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/34 hume propertyandlaw.pdf
Keywords:
world soul, natural law, category, formation, justice, injustice, equality, honesty, ethics.
