Conscience and sense of Justice of the Russian judges as a guarantee of fair administration of criminal justice and combat corruption in modern Russia
( Pp. 142-148)

This article is devoted to the exploration of space, the role and importance of conscience and sense of Justice judges in ensuring the fair administration of criminal justice and combat corruption in modern Russia, there are designated separate conceptual and legislative error in field theoretical formulation, legal regulation and practice of applying in criminal proceedings, the concepts of "conscience" and "lawfulness" of judges and all actors of the legislative and enforcement process, without which it is impossible to imagine either committed the criminal procedure law nor civilized criminal justice theory and practice.

Ibragimov I.., Ibragimova A.., (2017), CONSCIENCE AND SENSE OF JUSTICE OF THE RUSSIAN JUDGES AS A GUARANTEE OF FAIR ADMINISTRATION OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND COMBAT CORRUPTION IN MODERN RUSSIA. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 5 => 142-148.

Balakshin V.S. Istina v ugolovnom protsesse //Zakonnost . 1998. № 2.
Bol shoy yuridicheskiy slovar . /Pod red. A.YA. Sukhareva, V.E. Krutskikh. M.,2003.
Bokhan V.F. Formirovanie ubezhdeniy sud i. Minsk, 1973.
Burdanova V.S. Poiski istiny v ugolovnom protsesse. - SPb.: Izdatel stvo YUridicheskiy tsentr Press , 2006.
Bekon F. Sochineniya. V dvukh tomakh. M., 1971-1972. T. 2.
Vayss Bernard Dzh. Dukh Musul manskogo prava.Moskva-Sankt-Peterburg,2008.
Veyninger. O. Pol i kharakter. M., 1997.
Demidov V.V. Obstoyatel stva, isklyuchayushchie uchastie v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve. M., 2002.
Drevnekitayskaya filosofiya. V dvukh tomakh. M., 1972. T. 1.
Evropeyskaya konventsiya o pravakh cheloveka i evropeyskaya sotsial naya khartiya: pravo i praktika. M., 1998.
Enikeev M.I. Osnovy obshchey i yuridicheskoy psikhologii. M., 1996.
Zakon RF O statuse sudey v Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 28.11.2009 N 296-FZ ot 29.03.2010 N 37-FZ;
Zakony vol nykh obshchestv Dagestana XVII-XIX vekov. Paragraf 4 Sbornika adatov SHamkhal stva Tarkovskogo i KHanstva Mekhtulinskogo. Arkhivnye materialy./Sostaviteli KH.M.KHashaev, otvetstvennyy redaktor G.A. Daniyalov. Makhachkala. Epokha. 2007.
Iban es P.A. K voprosu o pozitivnoy etike sud i //Etika sud i. Posobie dlya sudey. M., 2002.
Ibragimov I.M. Kontseptual nye problemy ustanovleniya istiny i voprosy sovershenstvovaniya zakonodatel stva i pravoprimenitel noy praktiki v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve sovremennoy Rossii. Rossiyskaya YUstitsiya. M. 2015-6.
Ibragimova A.I. KHarakternye i protsessual nye osobennosti spravedlivogo vozmeshcheniya prichinennogo prestupleniem vreda poterpevshemu v ramkakh ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva. Mezhdunarodnaya nauchno-prakticheskaya konferentsiya: Sudebnaya reforma: rezul taty, problemy i tendentsii.M.2016;
Ibragimova A.I. Kontseptual nye problemy sovershenstvovaniya pravovykh osnovaniy i praktiki vozmeshcheniya vreda, prichinennogo prestupleniem. Evraziyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. M.2016.№ 1.
Kant I. Osnovy metafiziki nravstvennosti //Sochineniya v shesti tomakh. T. 4. CHast 1. M., 1965.
Karnozova L.M. Gumanitarnye nachala v deyatel nosti sud i v ugolovnom protsesse. M., Prospekt. 2004.
Koblikov D.S. Nravstvennye nachala deyatel nosti predsedatel stvuyushchego v sudebnom zasedanii //Sovetskaya yustitsiya. 1987. № 6.
Koni A.F. Nravstvennye nachala v ugolovnom protsesse /Ocherki i vospominaniya. M., 1906g.
Korenevskiy YU. V. Ob istine v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve. Dokazyvanie v ugolovnom protsesse. Traditsii i sovremennost . M., 2000.
Korneev G.P. Metodologicheskie problemy ugolovno-protsessual nogo poznaniya. Nizhniy Novgorod. 1995.
Kukel V.V. Otvetstvennost sud i kak garantiya prav i svobod grazhdan na sudebnuyu zashchitu. //Pravo: istoriya, teoriya, praktika. Sb. statey i materialov. Vyp.10. Bryansk. Izd-vo BGU, 2006.
Morshchakova T.G. Psikhologicheskie istoki sudebnykh oshibok i vnutrennee ubezhdenie sudey //Effektivnost pravosudiya i problema ustraneniya sudebnykh oshibok. CHast 2. M., 1975.
Motovilovker YA.O. O printsipakh ob ektivnoy istiny, prezumptsii nevinovnosti i sostyazatel nosti protsessa. YAroslavl , 1978.
Murad yan E.M. Istina kak problema sudebnogo prava. M., 2002.;
Osipyan B.A. Kriterii pravomernosti tipov i form gosudarstva. //Istoriya gosudarstva i prava. 2007. №18.
Radutnaya N.V. Etika sud i. //Etika sud i. Posobie dlya sudey. M., 2002.
Svyatitel Ioann Zlatoust. O vere, nadezhde i lyubvi. M., 2005.
Statut Velikogo knyazhestva Litovskogo 1529 goda. V dvukh chastyakh. CHast 1. SPb., 1811.
Syukiyaynen L.R. SHariat i musul manskaya pravovaya kul tura. M., 1997.
Tkachyev V. Ot Kodeksa chesti sud i k Kodeksu sudeyskoy etiki. //Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2003. № 4.
Tolkovyy slovar russkogo yazyka /Sostaviteli: S.I.Ozhegov i N.YU. SHvedova. CHetvyertoe izdanie, dopolnennoe. M., 2004.
Trubetskoy E.N. Izbrannye proizvedeniya. Smysl zhizni. R-n-D. 1988.
Ugolovno-protsessual nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii. M.2016 g.

corruption, anti-corruption, conscience, awareness, the court, the judge, jurors, the Prosecutor, the investigator, the inquirer, justice, criminal justice, criminal proceedings.