Features and prospects of the reform of the Russian legislation in the sphere of digitalization
( Pp. 165-171)

The purpose of the research in this article is the adaptation of legislation in order to solve legal problems arising from the development and use of digital technologies and their products. The categories of legal personality and protection of digital technologies are considered, as well as the foundations of their legal regulation. The article defines the methods of protecting intellectual property rights in the digital sphere and examines the development of legislation in terms of establishing the responsibility of both developers and users of digital programs. The scenarios for the development of the legal system within the framework of digitalization are considered, based on the positions of experts, which consist in 1) restructuring the traditional legal model, or 2) in introducing fundamental changes to the country's legislation and transforming it into a new legal model. Conclusions. In recent years, there has been a tendency to marginalize the digital sphere of law and emphasize the limited adaptive capabilities of traditional legislation in regulating digital technologies. It is important to develop fundamentally new legal structures of digital technologies, taking into account their legal personality and security, which would take into account the goal of the progressive development of the digital economy and the technical capabilities of individual technologies. Legal problems associated with digitalization can be conditionally divided into two groups of issues: general aspects of the transformation of digital law (the possibility of adapting modern civil and financial legislation to digital transformation) and the legal nature of digital technologies as an object of civil rights, along with issues of introducing digital technologies: Internet of Things, artificial intelligence, big data, machine learning, drones, robots and similar fields that require detailed scientific analysis and limited applications.

Gripich S.A., (2020), FEATURES AND PROSPECTS OF THE REFORM OF THE RUSSIAN LEGISLATION IN THE SPHERE OF DIGITALIZATION. Economic Problems and Legal Practice, 6 => 165-171.

Neznamov A.V., Naumov V.B. (2018). Strategiya regulirovaniya robototekhniki i kiberfizicheskikh sistem // Zakon. 2019. №2. S. 69-89.
Ponkin I.V., Redkina A.I. Iskusstvennyy intellekt s tochki zreniya prava // Vsetnik RUDN. 2018. № 22 (1). S. 91-109.
E. L. Sidorenko, P. fon Arks. Transformatsiya prava v kontekste tsifrovizatsii: v poiske prioritetov // Informatsionnoe pravo. 2020. №1(1). S. 24-38
Federal nyy zakon Ob informatsii, informatsionnykh tekhnologiyakh i o zashchite informatsii ot 27.07.2006 N 149-FZ
Catterwell, R. (2020) Automation in contract interpretation. Forthcoming, Law, Innovation and Technology Journal, 12(1), 81-112. https://doi.org/10.1080/17579961.2020.1727068
Chessman, C. F. (2018, June 29). Not quite human: Artificial Intelligence, animals, and the regulation of sentient property. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3200802
Chung, J., Zink, A. (2018). Hey Watson, can I sue you for malpractice Examining the liability of artificial intelligence in medicine. Asia-Pacific Journal of Health Law Ethics, 11(2), 51-80.
Directive 96/9/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 1996 on the legal protection of databases.
FATF (2019, June). Guidance for a Risk-Based Approach to Virtual Assets and Virtual Asset Service Providers. Paper presented at the meeting of FATF, Paris. // URL: www.fatf-gafi.org/publications/fatfrecommendations/documents/Guidance-RBAvirtual-assets.html
Holden, P. (2016). Flying robots and privacy in Canada. Canadian Journal of Law and Technology, 14(1), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2571490
Huang, R., Yang, D., Loo, F. (2020). The development and regu-lation of cryptoassets: Hong Kong experiences and a comparative analysis. European Business Organization Law Review, 21, 319-347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40804-020-00174-z
Kaminski, M. E. (2015). Robots in the home: What will we have agreed to Ohio State Public Law Working Paper No. 292, 51(3), 661-677. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2592500
Mohamed, S., Zulhuda, S. (2015). The concept of internet of things and its challenges to privacy. South East Asia Journal of Contemporary Business, Economics and Law, 8(4), 1-6.
Wachter, S., Mittelstadt, B., Russell, C. (2020, March 3). Why fairness cannot be automated: Bridging the gap between EU non-discrimination law and AI. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3547922

digitalization, information and analytical systems, legal regulation, personal data protection, information security, artificial intelligence, robotization.