Postponement of serving a sentence: legal aspects
( Pp. 112-114)

More about authors
Kuznetsov Alexander Ivanovich podpolkovnik vnutrenney sluzhby. Dolzhnost: starshiy prepodavatel. Mesto raboty: Permskiy institut FSIN Rossii. Podrazdelenie: kafedra ugolovnogo i ugolovno-ispolnitelnogo prava
Perm Institute of the Federal Penal Service
Abstract:
In this article, some issues of concern are being considered. It is devoted to legal regulation of deferred sentence, that has an impact on control provision effectiveness over the accused persons by officers of Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia. The purpose is criminal law, penal enforcement law and normative acts analysis, which regulate the issues of control provision over the convicted persons` behavior, who have the postponement of serving the sentence. Pattern: Scientific cognition set of methods makes the methodological basis of the research work, where the main position takes dialectical method. In this article, general (dialectics, analysis and synthesis, abstracting and concretizing) and specific (legalistic, rather-legal analysis, technical legal) scientific methods are used. In the course of scientific inquiry, special focus will be on comparative and systematic methods of investigation. Conclusions: in the result of the research the author insists on the introduction in criminal legislation (clauses 82, 82.1) and penal enforcement legislation (clauses 178, 178.1). Practical importance: conclusions and proposals can be used in law-making to develop criminal legislation and penal enforcement legislation standards with the continued research on postponement of serving the sentence. Author`s proposals implementation permits to provide with the control effectiveness over the accused person`s behavior with the postponing of punishment.
How to Cite:
Kuznetsov A.I., (2018), POSTPONEMENT OF SERVING A SENTENCE: LEGAL ASPECTS. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 2 => 112-114.
Reference list:
Ugolovnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii: federal nyy zakon ot 13 iyunya 1996 № 63-FZ (v red. Federal nogo zakona ot 31.12.2017 № 501-FZ) // Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF. 1996. 17 iyunya. № 25. St. 2954.
Ugolovno-ispolnitel nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 08.01.1997 № 1-FZ (v red. Federal nogo zakona ot 20.12.2017 № 410-FZ) // Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF. 1997. 13 yanvarya. № 2. St. 198.
Ugolovno-protsessual nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii: federal nyy zakon ot 08 yanvarya 1997 № 1-FZ (v red. Federal nogo zakona ot 31.12.2017 № 501-FZ) // Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF. 2001. 24 dekabrya. № 52. ch. I. St. 49.
Krymov A.A. Kollizii ugolovnogo, ugolovno-protsessual nogo i ugolovno-ispolnitel nogo zakonodatel stva na stadii ispolneniya prigovora. / Vestnik Vladimirskogo yuridicheskogo instituta. 2013 № 4 (29). S. 112.
Buzina M.V. O neobkhodimosti naznacheniya ispytatel nogo sroka pri primenenii otsrochki otbyvaniya nakazaniya po stat e 82 UK RF / Ugolovno-ispolnitel noe pravo. 2011. № 2. S. 59.
Keywords:
convicted, the sentencing, the delay, efficiency, responsibilities, criminal and penal law.