PROBLEMATIC ISSUES OF RELATION BETWEEN EXPERT CONCLUSION AND SPECIALIST OPINION
( Pp. 16-18)
More about authors
Egorov Nikolay Nikolaevich
d-r yurid. nauk, professor. Dolzhnost: professor. Mesto raboty: Moskovskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet imeni M.V.Lomonosova. Podrazdelenie: kafedra kriminalistiki.
Moscow State University named after m.V.lomonosov
Moscow State University named after m.V.lomonosov
Abstract:
The article analyzes the relationship expert conclusion and specialist opinion. The author considers the competition between them and the ways of its resolving.
How to Cite:
Egorov N.N., (2017), PROBLEMATIC ISSUES OF RELATION BETWEEN EXPERT CONCLUSION AND SPECIALIST OPINION. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 1 => 16-18.
Reference list:
Byulleten Verkhovnogo Suda RSFSR. 1976. № 10. S. 13 - 14.
Byulleten Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 1996. № 6. S. 8.
Byulleten Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 1999. № 5. S. 15-16.
Byulleten Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 1999. № 11. S. 14.
Byulleten Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 2000. № 5. S. 14.
Egorov N.N. Perspektivy ispol zovaniya spetsial nykh znaniy na stadii predvaritel nogo rassledovaniya // Sovremennoe ugolovno-protsessual noe pravo Rossii - uroki istorii i problemy dal neyshego reformirovaniya, Vserossiyskaya nauchno-prakticheskaya konf. (2014; Orel). Orel: OrYUI MVD Rossii imeni V.V.Luk yanova, 2014. S. 106-111.
Mikhaylov V.A., Dubyagin YU.P. Naznachenie i proizvodstvo sudebnoy ekspertizy v stadii predvaritel nogo rassledovaniya: uchebnoe posobie Volgograd: VSSH MVD RF, 1991. S. 8.
O sudebnoy praktike po delam o khishchenii, vymogatel stve i nezakonnom oborote oruzhiya, boepripasov, vzryvchatykh veshchestv i vzryvnykh ustroystv: Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 12 marta 2002 g. № 5 (s izmeneniyami i dopolneniyami, vnesennymi postanovleniem Plenuma ot 6 fevralya 2007 g. № 7 i postanovleniem Plenuma ot 3 dekabrya 2013 g. № 34). P.7 // Elektronnyy resurs:http://ppvs.rf/2002/postanovlenie-plenuma-vs-rf/N05-ot-12.03.2002.html.
O sudebnoy praktike po delam o prestupleniyakh, svyazannykh s narkoticheskimi sredstvami, psikhotropnymi, sil nodeystvuyushchimi i yadovitymi veshchestvami: Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 15 iyunya 2006 g. № 14 (s izmeneniyami i dopolneniyami, vnesennymi postanovleniem Plenuma ot 23 dekabrya 2010 g. № 31). P. 2 // Elektronnyy resurs: http://ppvs.rf/2006/postanovlenie-plenuma-vs-rf/N14-ot-15.06.2006.html.
O sudebnoy ekspertize po ugolovnym delam: Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 21 dekabrya 2010 g. № 28. P. 20 // Elektronnyy resurs: http://www.rg.ru/2010/12/30/postanovlenie-dok.html.
O primenenii sudami zakonodatel stva ob otvetstvennosti za narusheniya v oblasti okhrany okruzhayushchey sredy i prirodopol zovaniya: Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 18 oktyabrya 2012 g. № 21. P. 40 // Elektronnyy resurs: http://www.rg.ru/2012/10/31/postanovlenie-dok.html.
Osnovy sudebnoy ekspertizy. CH. 1. Obshchaya teoriya / Otv. red. YU. G. Korukhov. M.: RFTSSE, 1997. S. 80 - 81.
Pridanov S.A., SHCHerba S.P. Prestupleniya, posyagayushchie na kul turnye tsennosti Rossii: kvalifikatsiya i rassledovanie. M.: YUrlitinform, 2002. S. 209.
Sidorov A.A. Problemy uchastiya spetsialistov v rassledovanii prestupleniy: Avtoref. dis. kand yurid. Krasnodar, 2000. S. 11.
Tolstukhina T.V. Sovremennye tendentsii razvitiya sudebnykh ekspertiz na osnove informatsionnykh tekhnologiy: Dis. dokt. yurid. nauk. M., 1999. S. 49.
Byulleten Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 1996. № 6. S. 8.
Byulleten Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 1999. № 5. S. 15-16.
Byulleten Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 1999. № 11. S. 14.
Byulleten Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 2000. № 5. S. 14.
Egorov N.N. Perspektivy ispol zovaniya spetsial nykh znaniy na stadii predvaritel nogo rassledovaniya // Sovremennoe ugolovno-protsessual noe pravo Rossii - uroki istorii i problemy dal neyshego reformirovaniya, Vserossiyskaya nauchno-prakticheskaya konf. (2014; Orel). Orel: OrYUI MVD Rossii imeni V.V.Luk yanova, 2014. S. 106-111.
Mikhaylov V.A., Dubyagin YU.P. Naznachenie i proizvodstvo sudebnoy ekspertizy v stadii predvaritel nogo rassledovaniya: uchebnoe posobie Volgograd: VSSH MVD RF, 1991. S. 8.
O sudebnoy praktike po delam o khishchenii, vymogatel stve i nezakonnom oborote oruzhiya, boepripasov, vzryvchatykh veshchestv i vzryvnykh ustroystv: Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 12 marta 2002 g. № 5 (s izmeneniyami i dopolneniyami, vnesennymi postanovleniem Plenuma ot 6 fevralya 2007 g. № 7 i postanovleniem Plenuma ot 3 dekabrya 2013 g. № 34). P.7 // Elektronnyy resurs:http://ppvs.rf/2002/postanovlenie-plenuma-vs-rf/N05-ot-12.03.2002.html.
O sudebnoy praktike po delam o prestupleniyakh, svyazannykh s narkoticheskimi sredstvami, psikhotropnymi, sil nodeystvuyushchimi i yadovitymi veshchestvami: Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 15 iyunya 2006 g. № 14 (s izmeneniyami i dopolneniyami, vnesennymi postanovleniem Plenuma ot 23 dekabrya 2010 g. № 31). P. 2 // Elektronnyy resurs: http://ppvs.rf/2006/postanovlenie-plenuma-vs-rf/N14-ot-15.06.2006.html.
O sudebnoy ekspertize po ugolovnym delam: Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 21 dekabrya 2010 g. № 28. P. 20 // Elektronnyy resurs: http://www.rg.ru/2010/12/30/postanovlenie-dok.html.
O primenenii sudami zakonodatel stva ob otvetstvennosti za narusheniya v oblasti okhrany okruzhayushchey sredy i prirodopol zovaniya: Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 18 oktyabrya 2012 g. № 21. P. 40 // Elektronnyy resurs: http://www.rg.ru/2012/10/31/postanovlenie-dok.html.
Osnovy sudebnoy ekspertizy. CH. 1. Obshchaya teoriya / Otv. red. YU. G. Korukhov. M.: RFTSSE, 1997. S. 80 - 81.
Pridanov S.A., SHCHerba S.P. Prestupleniya, posyagayushchie na kul turnye tsennosti Rossii: kvalifikatsiya i rassledovanie. M.: YUrlitinform, 2002. S. 209.
Sidorov A.A. Problemy uchastiya spetsialistov v rassledovanii prestupleniy: Avtoref. dis. kand yurid. Krasnodar, 2000. S. 11.
Tolstukhina T.V. Sovremennye tendentsii razvitiya sudebnykh ekspertiz na osnove informatsionnykh tekhnologiy: Dis. dokt. yurid. nauk. M., 1999. S. 49.
Keywords:
special knowledge, procedural forms of using special knowledge, opinion and expert testimony, conclusion and testimony of a specialist.
Related Articles
New Solutions in Law-making Pages: 128-136 DOI: 10.33693/2223-0092-2021-11-4-128-136 Issue №19520
The concept of criminalistic doctrine on the implementation of special knowledge outside the forensic expertise
conceptual framework
specialist
forensic science
criminality training on the implementation of specialized knowledge outside forensic expertise
interdisciplinary scientific research
Show more
8. CRIMINAL LAW (5.1.4.) Pages: 249-255 Issue №20974
Criminalistic Teaching About the Implementation of Special Knowledge Outside of Forensic Examination: The Results of the Study
criminology
criminalistic teaching
interdisciplinary research
specialist
special knowledge
Show more
3. CRIMINALISTIC, PROCEDURAL AND OPERATIVE-SEARCH MEASURES TO COUNTER CRIME IN THE GLOBALIZATION CONDITIONS Pages: 255-258 Issue №16988
Use of special knowledge in the investigation of intentional bankruptcy in Russian Federation
special knowledge
deliberate bankruptcy
the use of special knowledge in the investigation
criminal procedural activities of a specialist and expert
criminal procedural legislation of Russia
Show more
3. CRIMINALISTIC, PROCEDURAL AND OPERATIVE-SEARCH MEASURES TO COUNTER CRIME IN THE GLOBALIZATION CONDITIONS Pages: 251-254 Issue №16988
Current issues of using special knowledge in the investigation of violent crimes
special knowledge
expertise
research
specialist
traces
Show more
CRIMINAL PROCESS (12.00.09) Pages: 304-307 Issue №19269
On Some Problems of Using Special Knowledge in Investigating Crimes
special knowledge
specialist
expert opinion
crime investigation
criminal procedure
Show more
7. Forensics; Forensic expertise; Operational and search activities Pages: 230-232 Issue №4539
Possibility of Using the Results of Special Psychophysiological Researches and Forensic Examination of Individuals with the Signs of Simulation and Aggravation of Somatic Illnesses
special knowledge
psychophysiological study using polygraph
a forensic examination
Show more
7. Forensics; Forensic expertise; Operational and search activities Pages: 222-225 Issue №4539
ON THE FORMATION SPETSIOLOGII AS A NEW DIRECTION IN JURISPRUDENCE
speleologia
specialist
special knowledge
special knowledge
ekspertika
Show more
14. FORENSICS; FORENSIC EXPERTISE; OPERATIONAL AND SEARCH ACTIVITIES 12.00.12 Pages: 318-321 Issue №17564
Subject, objects and tasks of forensic examination of intellectual property objects
forensic science
forensic examination
special knowledge
patents
trademarks
Show more
16. OTHER Pages: 239-243 Issue №5902
TYPES OF LINGUISTIC EXPERT EXAMINATION IN JURISPRUDENCE: PURPOSE AND RESULTS
linguistic expertise
special knowledge
judicial speech study
defense in court
the rule of law
Show more
12. Forensics; Forensic expertise; Operational and search activities; Criminal procedure Pages: 215-218 Issue №6841
ABOUT IMPROVEMENT OF LEGAL REGULATION OF JUDICIAL AND EXPERT ACTIVITY IN THE SPHERE OF FORENSIC MEDICINE
special knowledge
forensic organization
a forensic examination
expert
certification
Show more
