PROBLEMATIC ISSUES OF RELATION BETWEEN EXPERT CONCLUSION AND SPECIALIST OPINION
( Pp. 16-18)
More about authors
Egorov Nikolay Nikolaevich
d-r yurid. nauk, professor. Dolzhnost: professor. Mesto raboty: Moskovskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet imeni M.V.Lomonosova. Podrazdelenie: kafedra kriminalistiki.
Moscow State University named after m.V.lomonosov
Moscow State University named after m.V.lomonosov
Abstract:
The article analyzes the relationship expert conclusion and specialist opinion. The author considers the competition between them and the ways of its resolving.
How to Cite:
Egorov N.N., (2017), PROBLEMATIC ISSUES OF RELATION BETWEEN EXPERT CONCLUSION AND SPECIALIST OPINION. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 1 => 16-18.
Reference list:
Byulleten Verkhovnogo Suda RSFSR. 1976. № 10. S. 13 - 14.
Byulleten Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 1996. № 6. S. 8.
Byulleten Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 1999. № 5. S. 15-16.
Byulleten Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 1999. № 11. S. 14.
Byulleten Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 2000. № 5. S. 14.
Egorov N.N. Perspektivy ispol zovaniya spetsial nykh znaniy na stadii predvaritel nogo rassledovaniya // Sovremennoe ugolovno-protsessual noe pravo Rossii - uroki istorii i problemy dal neyshego reformirovaniya, Vserossiyskaya nauchno-prakticheskaya konf. (2014; Orel). Orel: OrYUI MVD Rossii imeni V.V.Luk yanova, 2014. S. 106-111.
Mikhaylov V.A., Dubyagin YU.P. Naznachenie i proizvodstvo sudebnoy ekspertizy v stadii predvaritel nogo rassledovaniya: uchebnoe posobie Volgograd: VSSH MVD RF, 1991. S. 8.
O sudebnoy praktike po delam o khishchenii, vymogatel stve i nezakonnom oborote oruzhiya, boepripasov, vzryvchatykh veshchestv i vzryvnykh ustroystv: Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 12 marta 2002 g. № 5 (s izmeneniyami i dopolneniyami, vnesennymi postanovleniem Plenuma ot 6 fevralya 2007 g. № 7 i postanovleniem Plenuma ot 3 dekabrya 2013 g. № 34). P.7 // Elektronnyy resurs:http://ppvs.rf/2002/postanovlenie-plenuma-vs-rf/N05-ot-12.03.2002.html.
O sudebnoy praktike po delam o prestupleniyakh, svyazannykh s narkoticheskimi sredstvami, psikhotropnymi, sil nodeystvuyushchimi i yadovitymi veshchestvami: Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 15 iyunya 2006 g. № 14 (s izmeneniyami i dopolneniyami, vnesennymi postanovleniem Plenuma ot 23 dekabrya 2010 g. № 31). P. 2 // Elektronnyy resurs: http://ppvs.rf/2006/postanovlenie-plenuma-vs-rf/N14-ot-15.06.2006.html.
O sudebnoy ekspertize po ugolovnym delam: Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 21 dekabrya 2010 g. № 28. P. 20 // Elektronnyy resurs: http://www.rg.ru/2010/12/30/postanovlenie-dok.html.
O primenenii sudami zakonodatel stva ob otvetstvennosti za narusheniya v oblasti okhrany okruzhayushchey sredy i prirodopol zovaniya: Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 18 oktyabrya 2012 g. № 21. P. 40 // Elektronnyy resurs: http://www.rg.ru/2012/10/31/postanovlenie-dok.html.
Osnovy sudebnoy ekspertizy. CH. 1. Obshchaya teoriya / Otv. red. YU. G. Korukhov. M.: RFTSSE, 1997. S. 80 - 81.
Pridanov S.A., SHCHerba S.P. Prestupleniya, posyagayushchie na kul turnye tsennosti Rossii: kvalifikatsiya i rassledovanie. M.: YUrlitinform, 2002. S. 209.
Sidorov A.A. Problemy uchastiya spetsialistov v rassledovanii prestupleniy: Avtoref. dis. kand yurid. Krasnodar, 2000. S. 11.
Tolstukhina T.V. Sovremennye tendentsii razvitiya sudebnykh ekspertiz na osnove informatsionnykh tekhnologiy: Dis. dokt. yurid. nauk. M., 1999. S. 49.
Byulleten Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 1996. № 6. S. 8.
Byulleten Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 1999. № 5. S. 15-16.
Byulleten Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 1999. № 11. S. 14.
Byulleten Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 2000. № 5. S. 14.
Egorov N.N. Perspektivy ispol zovaniya spetsial nykh znaniy na stadii predvaritel nogo rassledovaniya // Sovremennoe ugolovno-protsessual noe pravo Rossii - uroki istorii i problemy dal neyshego reformirovaniya, Vserossiyskaya nauchno-prakticheskaya konf. (2014; Orel). Orel: OrYUI MVD Rossii imeni V.V.Luk yanova, 2014. S. 106-111.
Mikhaylov V.A., Dubyagin YU.P. Naznachenie i proizvodstvo sudebnoy ekspertizy v stadii predvaritel nogo rassledovaniya: uchebnoe posobie Volgograd: VSSH MVD RF, 1991. S. 8.
O sudebnoy praktike po delam o khishchenii, vymogatel stve i nezakonnom oborote oruzhiya, boepripasov, vzryvchatykh veshchestv i vzryvnykh ustroystv: Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 12 marta 2002 g. № 5 (s izmeneniyami i dopolneniyami, vnesennymi postanovleniem Plenuma ot 6 fevralya 2007 g. № 7 i postanovleniem Plenuma ot 3 dekabrya 2013 g. № 34). P.7 // Elektronnyy resurs:http://ppvs.rf/2002/postanovlenie-plenuma-vs-rf/N05-ot-12.03.2002.html.
O sudebnoy praktike po delam o prestupleniyakh, svyazannykh s narkoticheskimi sredstvami, psikhotropnymi, sil nodeystvuyushchimi i yadovitymi veshchestvami: Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 15 iyunya 2006 g. № 14 (s izmeneniyami i dopolneniyami, vnesennymi postanovleniem Plenuma ot 23 dekabrya 2010 g. № 31). P. 2 // Elektronnyy resurs: http://ppvs.rf/2006/postanovlenie-plenuma-vs-rf/N14-ot-15.06.2006.html.
O sudebnoy ekspertize po ugolovnym delam: Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 21 dekabrya 2010 g. № 28. P. 20 // Elektronnyy resurs: http://www.rg.ru/2010/12/30/postanovlenie-dok.html.
O primenenii sudami zakonodatel stva ob otvetstvennosti za narusheniya v oblasti okhrany okruzhayushchey sredy i prirodopol zovaniya: Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 18 oktyabrya 2012 g. № 21. P. 40 // Elektronnyy resurs: http://www.rg.ru/2012/10/31/postanovlenie-dok.html.
Osnovy sudebnoy ekspertizy. CH. 1. Obshchaya teoriya / Otv. red. YU. G. Korukhov. M.: RFTSSE, 1997. S. 80 - 81.
Pridanov S.A., SHCHerba S.P. Prestupleniya, posyagayushchie na kul turnye tsennosti Rossii: kvalifikatsiya i rassledovanie. M.: YUrlitinform, 2002. S. 209.
Sidorov A.A. Problemy uchastiya spetsialistov v rassledovanii prestupleniy: Avtoref. dis. kand yurid. Krasnodar, 2000. S. 11.
Tolstukhina T.V. Sovremennye tendentsii razvitiya sudebnykh ekspertiz na osnove informatsionnykh tekhnologiy: Dis. dokt. yurid. nauk. M., 1999. S. 49.
Keywords:
special knowledge, procedural forms of using special knowledge, opinion and expert testimony, conclusion and testimony of a specialist.
Related Articles
New Solutions in Law-making Pages: 128-136 DOI: 10.33693/2223-0092-2021-11-4-128-136 Issue №19520
The concept of criminalistic doctrine on the implementation of special knowledge outside the forensic expertise
conceptual framework
specialist
forensic science
criminality training on the implementation of specialized knowledge outside forensic expertise
interdisciplinary scientific research
Show more
4. Criminal law and criminology; Criminal enforcement law Pages: 57-60 Issue №4894
USE OF SPECIAL KNOWLEDGE AT THE STAGE OF INITIATION OF CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS
special knowledge
special studies
expert
specialist
a criminal case
Show more
THE SCIENTIFIC RESULTS SUBMITTED FOR DISSERTATION DEFENSE Pages: 128-136 DOI: 10.33693/2541-8025-2024-20-4-128-136 Issue №133764
Introduction to Judicial Specialty: Basic Scientific Interdisciplinary Study
forensics
forensic science on the implementation of special knowledge beyond forensic expertise
scientific basis
specialist
specialized knowledge
Show more
GENERAL THEORETICAL, CRIMINAL-LEGAL AND OTHER PROBLEMS OF COUNTERING EXTREMISM AND TERRORISM. PROBLEMS OF PREVENTING EXTREMISM AND TERRORISM Pages: 104-110 Issue №23752
Use of Special Knowledge in Investigating Crimes Committed by Different Categories of Persons
crime
investigation
investigators
specialists
special knowledge
Show more
PRIVATE AND PUBLIC LAW Pages: 106-115 Issue №16619
About dissonance in the cognitive approaches of determining objects of copyright with the use of specialist’s special knowledge
civil legal relations
intellectual property
methodological approaches
object of copyright
work program of the discipline
Show more
3. CRIMINALISTIC, PROCEDURAL AND OPERATIVE-SEARCH MEASURES TO COUNTER CRIME IN THE GLOBALIZATION CONDITIONS Pages: 98-101 Issue №18933
About the Content of Special Knowledge in the Investigation of Crimes
expert practice
forensic technology
special knowledge
investigation of crimes
Show more
10. Forensics; Forensic expertise; Operational and search activities; Criminal procedure Pages: 168-170 Issue №7765
PROBLEMS AND PROSPECTS OF THE REGULATION OF USE OF TECHNICAL MEANS IN CRIMINAL TRIAL
technical means
electronic media
proof
specialist
special knowledge
Show more
7. Criminal procedure Pages: 136-139 Issue №5413
The application of special knowledge on crimes related to the use of plastic cards
plastic cards
examination
special knowledge
Bank card
Show more
12. FORENSICS; FORENSIC EXPERTISE; OPERATIONAL AND SEARCH ACTIVITIES 12.00.12 Pages: 245-250 DOI: 10.33693/2541-8025-2021-17-4-245-250 Issue №19457
The Language of Criminalistic Doctrine on the Implementation of Special Knowledge Outside Forensic Expertise
conceptual foundations
criminalistics
interdisciplinary scientific research
operational investigative activity
special knowledge
Show more
7. Criminal procedure Pages: 191-195 Issue №3132
PROBLEMS OF PROFESSIONAL SPECIALIST IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS
specialist
Federal law "On the expert's activities in the Russian Federation"
a competent person
special knowledge
the criminal process
Show more
