Judicial Detention Decisions: Problems Encountered When They Are Made
( Pp. 187-190)
More about authors
Kalinkina Lyubov Danilovna
Cand.Sci.(Law), Associate Professor, Honorary Lawyer of the Russian Federation, Honored Lawyer of the Republic of Mordovia, Head of the Criminal Procedure, Justice and prosecutorial supervision Department, Law institute
National Research Ogarev Mordovia State University
Saransk, Russian Federation
National Research Ogarev Mordovia State University
Saransk, Russian Federation
Abstract:
Purpose of the study. The article gives the concept of judicial decisions on detention. The problems discussed in the literature when making these judgments are analyzed. Conclusions. Based on the study of the practice of issuing the considered decisions by the courts, their shortcomings are characterized through the prism of the requirements of the law and criminal procedural means for their prevention and elimination are shown.
How to Cite:
Kalinkina L.D., (2022), JUDICIAL DETENTION DECISIONS: PROBLEMS ENCOUNTERED WHEN THEY ARE MADE. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 6 => 187-190.
Reference list:
Chervotkin A.S. New clarifications of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation on the application of preventive measures // Criminal process. 2020. No. 8. P. 24.
Davletov A.A., Azarenok N.V. A turn in the practice of choosing detention as a measure of restraint? // Russian justice. 2018. No. 9. pp. 59-60.
Skabelin S.I. The totality of data that is sufficient to select a measure of restraint in criminal proceedings // Lawyer. 2015. No. 11. P. 39.
Shadrina E.G. On the issue of the need to expand the permissible limits of judicial control (on the example of choosing a measure of restraint in the form of detention) // Russian judge. 2018. No. 5. pp. 41-42.
Archive of the Leninsky district court of Saransk. 2021 // Material No. 3/2-103/2021.
Archive of the Leninsky district court of Saransk. 2021 // Material No. 3/2-104/2021.
Davletov A.A., Azarenok N.V. A turn in the practice of choosing detention as a measure of restraint? // Russian justice. 2018. No. 9. pp. 59-60.
Skabelin S.I. The totality of data that is sufficient to select a measure of restraint in criminal proceedings // Lawyer. 2015. No. 11. P. 39.
Shadrina E.G. On the issue of the need to expand the permissible limits of judicial control (on the example of choosing a measure of restraint in the form of detention) // Russian judge. 2018. No. 5. pp. 41-42.
Archive of the Leninsky district court of Saransk. 2021 // Material No. 3/2-103/2021.
Archive of the Leninsky district court of Saransk. 2021 // Material No. 3/2-104/2021.
Keywords:
court decisions, detention, involvement of the accused in the commission of a crime, sufficient data.
