Taxpayer as a Subject of Proving in the Tax Process
( Pp. 184-189)

More about authors
Orlova Natalia A. Advisor to the State Civil Service of the Russian Federation, Grade 2, Deputy Head, Postgraduate Student of the Department of International and Public Law of the Faculty of Law, Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation (Financial university), Russia, Moscow. Hirsch Index - 1
Interdistrict Inspectorate of the Federal Tax Service of the Russian Federation No. 17 for the Moscow Region
Lyubertsy, Russia
Abstract:
Purpose of the study. The article examines the problems of the taxpayer being audited lacking the rights to implement an active position of assistance in collecting evidence, verifying and evaluating it, protecting rights and legitimate interests in the tax process. Proofing is the most important element of tax control today, which makes it possible to objectively establish the circumstances of the commission of a tax offense, the guilt of the inspected payer, its form, and also to qualify the committed act. Exactly the evidences those determines the type and degree of legal responsibility in this connection, the participation of a taxpayer in proving a tax violation is a necessary condition for protecting his rights and interests, excluding the possibility of illegal tax prosecution. Conclusions. As a result of the study, objective grounds were identified for the need to expand the subjective rights of a taxpayer in the tax process to ensure the possibility of participation in the collection and assessment of evidence. The proposed procedure for submitting applications and their consideration allows the taxpayer to declare his position on the need for certain tax control measures both during the course of a tax audit and outside of it, and from the tax authority to obtain additional legitimate evidence for the objective imputation of a tax offense. The author has developed specific amendments to be made to the Tax Code of the Russian Federation in order to protect the rights and interests of the taxpayer and streamline the procedure for considering the application.
How to Cite:
Orlova N.A., (2021), TAXPAYER AS A SUBJECT OF PROVING IN THE TAX PROCESS. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 6 => 184-189.
Reference list:
Demin A.V. Bill of Rights of Taxpayers: Basic Provisions // Tax Studies. 2020. No. 16.
Zmanovskaya O.V., Komarova G.P., Kasatkina G.M. Taxpayers' rights and their protection // Economics and Entrepreneurship. 2020 No. 3 (116). S. 1100-1105.
Kolozina O.V. Evidence and proof in a tax dispute: theory and practice // E-Scio. 2020. No. 7 (46). S. 465-472.
Konstandina E.I. Unreasonable tax benefit: current tendencies of proving // Russian legal journal. 2020.N 3.P. 159 - 166.
Konstandina E.I. Application of the rules of tax reconstruction in proving tax disputes within the framework of 54.1 of the Tax Code of the Russian Federation // Arbitration and civil procedure. 2020. No. 11.
Kosarenko NN Development of the institution of protection of the rights of a taxpayer in modern Russia // Scientific works of the Russian academy of advocacy and notaries. 2019. No. 3 (54). S. 60-64.
Krokhina Yu.A. Actual problems of seizure production in the tax process // Advocate practice. 2020. No. 5.
Krokhina A.M. Protection of the rights of the taxpayer in the production of seizure within the framework of the tax process // Advocate practice. 2021. No. 1. S. 9-13.
Kuznetsov L. D. Rights and obligations of taxpayers in foreign countries // Legal science. 2019. No. 11. P.38-42.
Osina D.M. Tax control in the USA: what to take into account // Tax specialist. 2019. No. 6.
Savostyanova S.A. Some problems of protecting the rights and legitimate interests of taxpayers in the implementation of tax control // Problems of Economics and Legal Practice. 2020 T. 16.No. 3.P. 182-186.
Tsvetkova E.A. Protected legitimate interest of the taxpayer as a legal category of tax law // Financial Law. 2020.No. 11.P. 23-26.
Tsoroeva T.M., Shuturova H.MB. Problems of protecting the rights of taxpayers in the Russian Federation // Colloquium-journal. 2020. No. 35-3 (87). S. 51-52.
Yadrikhinsky S.A. Struggle for the right, or conflicting aspects of the legitimate interests of the taxpayer // Legal paradigm. 2019.Vol. 18.No. 3.P. 68-75.
About Publication 1, Your Rights As A Taxpayer URL: https://www.irs.gov/forms-pubs/about-publication-1
Keywords:
taxpayer, rights, evidence, proof, tax control, tax process, petition.


Related Articles

PUBLIC LAW (STATE LAW) Pages: 14-19 Issue №72283
Expanding Powers of Higher Tax Authorities in Tax Process at the Stage of Resolving the Issue of Acceptance of Complaint for Consideration
tax process stage tax authorities taxpayer court
Show more
7. Criminal procedure Pages: 158-161 Issue №5413
BODY SEARCH IN THE CONTEXT OF APPROPRIATE MEANS OF COLLECTING PHYSICAL EVIDENCES IN PRE-TRIAL INQUIRY
personal search the detention of the suspect evidence the proper way of gathering evidence pre-trial criminal proceedings
Show more
6. CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Pages: 230-234 Issue №16680
To the question of the procedural status of the legal representatives of minors of victims, witnesses
minor victims and witnesses legal representative rights procedural status participants of criminal proceedings
Show more
5.2.4. FINANCE Pages: 276-279 Issue №20773
Current tax Issues Incentives for Housing Construction
taxes tax stimulation tax gaps tax control
Show more
CRIMINAL LAW (5.1.4.) Pages: 233-238 Issue №24238
Concept and Classification of Evidence Presented During Interrogation
evidence interrogation credibility admissibility relativity
Show more
FINANCE Pages: 308-314 DOI: 10.33693/2541-8025-2023-19-5-308-314 Issue №24704
Information Infrastructure of Tax Administration: Problems and Directions of Development
taxes tax administration taxpayers tax control information infrastructure.
Show more
8. Forensics; Forensic expertise; Operational and search activities Pages: 174-177 Issue №4285
To a question about the kinds of subjects and combating crimes investigation
the opposition investigation proof trial
Show more
8. Criminal procedure Pages: 194-196 Issue №8046
To the question of overcoming prejudice in criminal proceedings of the Russian Federation
criminal proceedings validity the sentence proof prejudice
Show more
INTERNATIONAL LAW Pages: 273-279 Issue №24870
The Impact of Information Technology on the Process of Evidence in Criminal Proceedings
information technologies criminal proceedings evidence proving artificial intelligence technologies
Show more
7. Criminal procedure Pages: 201-207 Issue №3132
Forensic tactics in proving criminal cases Illicit Trafficking in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances
proof proof criminal proceedings illicit traffic in narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances the judicial investigation
Show more