Objective truth or legal reality as a purpose of criminal procedural knowledge
( Pp. 150-154)
More about authors
Alexey P. Popov
Dr. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Professor of the Departments of Criminal Law disciplines and Judicial Expert Activities at the Institute of Jurisprudence and Engineering
Pyatigorsky State University
Pyatigorsk, Russian Federation Irina A. Popova Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor of the Department of Criminal Law and Forensic Expertise at the Institute of Jurisprudence and Engineering; Pyatigorsk State University
Pyatigorsky State University
Pyatigorsk, Russian Federation
Pyatigorsky State University
Pyatigorsk, Russian Federation Irina A. Popova Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor of the Department of Criminal Law and Forensic Expertise at the Institute of Jurisprudence and Engineering; Pyatigorsk State University
Pyatigorsky State University
Pyatigorsk, Russian Federation
Abstract:
Task: clarification of the doctrinal and legal definition of “truth”, comprehended in criminal proceedings. Revealing the institutions and norms of criminal procedure law that prevent the establishment of the truth in criminal proceedings. Methods: dialectical; formal legal; structural. Results: the tendency of criminal procedure legislation is to consolidate in it rules that do not contribute to the establishment of legal facts as they actually took place. In this regard, it is legitimate to raise the question not about the achievement of objective truth, but about the resolution of the criminal case on the merits. The indicated tendency in the future legislation should be changed.
How to Cite:
Alexey P.P., Irina A.P., (2021), OBJECTIVE TRUTH OR LEGAL REALITY AS A PURPOSE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURAL KNOWLEDGE. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 1 => 150-154.
Reference list:
Grigor ev V.N., Zinchenko I.A., Popov A.P. Komparativistskie zametki ob institute sledstvennogo sud i v dosudebnom ugolovnom proizvodstve // Mezhdunarodnoe ugolovnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnaya yustitsiya. 2016. № 1. S. 13-19.
Zinchenko I.A., Popova I.A. Reglamentatsiya printsipa ob ektivnoy istiny v ugolovno-protsessual nom zakonodatel stve // Vestnik Kaliningradskogo filiala Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. 2013. № 3 (33). S.15-19.
Zuev S.V., Sutyagin K.I. Ugolovnyy protsess: uchebnik. CHelyabinsk: Izd. tsentr YUUrGU, 2016. 563 s.
Kovtun N.N. Kabal naya sdelka (o fakticheskoy sushchnosti instituta, predusmotrennogo glavoy 40.1 UPK RF) // Ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo. 2020. № 2. S. 18-24.
Kruglikov A.P. Eshche raz ob istine v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve // Sovremennoe sostoyanie i problemy ugolovnogo i ugolovno-protsessual nogo prava, yuridicheskoy psikhologii: Materialy Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii. Volgograd: Izd-vo VolGU, 2012. S. 232-243.
Pashin S.A. Pravda i istina v sude elektronnyy resurs // Obshchaya tetrad . Vestnik Moskovskoy shkoly grazhdanskogo prosveshcheniya. 2014. № 2-3 (65) / URL: http://otetrad.ru/magazine-9.html
Popov A.P. Reglamentatsiya rezul tatov operativno-rozysknoy deyatel nosti v ugolovno-protsess-ual nom prave // Vestnik Kaliningradskogo filiala Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. 2013. № 1 (33). S. 7-11.
Popov A.P., Popova I.A. Problemy sovershenstvovaniya norm o predstavlenii predmetov i dokumentov kak sposobe sobiraniya dokazatel stv v ugolovnom protsesse // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2013. № 1. S. 163-166.
Popova I.A. Sovershenstvovanie zakonodatel stva, reglamentiruyushchego sobiranie dokazatel stv v ugolovnom protsesse Rossiyskoy Federatsii: aktual nye napravleniya sovremennogo etapa: dis. kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2014. 185 s.
Tarasov A.A. YUridicheskaya istina - pravovoy instrument ili predmet spekulyatsiy // YUridicheskaya istina v ugolovnom prave i protsesse. Materialy Vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii, 16-17 marta 2018 g. SPb.: ID Petropolis , 2018. S. 196-204.
Federal nyy zakon RF ot 20.07.2020 g. № 224-FZ O vnesenii izmeneniy v stat i 314 i 316 Ugolovno-protsessual nogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Ofitsial nyy internet-portal pravovoy informatsii / URL: http://publication.pravo.gov.ru/Document/View/ 0001202007200061
Zinchenko I.A., Popova I.A. Reglamentatsiya printsipa ob ektivnoy istiny v ugolovno-protsessual nom zakonodatel stve // Vestnik Kaliningradskogo filiala Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. 2013. № 3 (33). S.15-19.
Zuev S.V., Sutyagin K.I. Ugolovnyy protsess: uchebnik. CHelyabinsk: Izd. tsentr YUUrGU, 2016. 563 s.
Kovtun N.N. Kabal naya sdelka (o fakticheskoy sushchnosti instituta, predusmotrennogo glavoy 40.1 UPK RF) // Ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo. 2020. № 2. S. 18-24.
Kruglikov A.P. Eshche raz ob istine v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve // Sovremennoe sostoyanie i problemy ugolovnogo i ugolovno-protsessual nogo prava, yuridicheskoy psikhologii: Materialy Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii. Volgograd: Izd-vo VolGU, 2012. S. 232-243.
Pashin S.A. Pravda i istina v sude elektronnyy resurs // Obshchaya tetrad . Vestnik Moskovskoy shkoly grazhdanskogo prosveshcheniya. 2014. № 2-3 (65) / URL: http://otetrad.ru/magazine-9.html
Popov A.P. Reglamentatsiya rezul tatov operativno-rozysknoy deyatel nosti v ugolovno-protsess-ual nom prave // Vestnik Kaliningradskogo filiala Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. 2013. № 1 (33). S. 7-11.
Popov A.P., Popova I.A. Problemy sovershenstvovaniya norm o predstavlenii predmetov i dokumentov kak sposobe sobiraniya dokazatel stv v ugolovnom protsesse // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2013. № 1. S. 163-166.
Popova I.A. Sovershenstvovanie zakonodatel stva, reglamentiruyushchego sobiranie dokazatel stv v ugolovnom protsesse Rossiyskoy Federatsii: aktual nye napravleniya sovremennogo etapa: dis. kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2014. 185 s.
Tarasov A.A. YUridicheskaya istina - pravovoy instrument ili predmet spekulyatsiy // YUridicheskaya istina v ugolovnom prave i protsesse. Materialy Vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii, 16-17 marta 2018 g. SPb.: ID Petropolis , 2018. S. 196-204.
Federal nyy zakon RF ot 20.07.2020 g. № 224-FZ O vnesenii izmeneniy v stat i 314 i 316 Ugolovno-protsessual nogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Ofitsial nyy internet-portal pravovoy informatsii / URL: http://publication.pravo.gov.ru/Document/View/ 0001202007200061
Keywords:
theory of evidence, evidentiary law, objective truth, legal reality.
