Influence of supranational decisions on the exercise of the right to appeal against actions and decisions of officials in the constituent entities of the Russian federation
( Pp. 364-370)

The author examines the factors that predetermine the exercise of the constitutional right to appeal against the actions and decisions of officials in the subjects of the federation. The purpose of the study is to establish the features of harmonization of international decisions and constitutional legislation of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation in the field of the right to appeal. Methods - standard method was applied in the analysis of normative-legal acts on specific issues of procedure for appeals against actions and decisions of officials of regional level and the establishment of subjects of these legal relations. The collection and analysis of materials and interpretation of the results was used the hermeneutic method to discover the hidden meaning of legal texts. Results of the work - the legislation of the constituent entities of the federation, when detailing the mechanism for exercising the constitutional right to appeal, limits not only the constituent composition, but also the institutions involved in the implementation of the established mechanisms. Scope of the results: the author's proposals are of an applied nature in relation to the more effective implementation of the constitutional right to appeal in the constituent entities of the Russian Federation. Conclusions - given the emerging Russian practice in this category of cases, it is quite probable that the subjects of the federation have a chance to refute individual decisions of supranational authorities that directly affect their interests, including when officials are obliged to perform certain actions. At the same time, against the background of the existing legislative framework, this option looks unproductive and inappropriate. Originality / value - set contradiction of regional legislation and proposed an option to resolve conflicts in constitutional law to appeal against actions and decisions of officials.

Gizyatova S.V., (2020), INFLUENCE OF SUPRANATIONAL DECISIONS ON THE EXERCISE OF THE RIGHT TO APPEAL AGAINST ACTIONS AND DECISIONS OF OFFICIALS IN THE CONSTITUENT ENTITIES OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 5 => 364-370.

Apellyatsionnoe opredelenie Verkhovnogo suda Respubliki Tatarstan ot 04.12.2014 po delu N 33-16393/2014 O vosstanovlenii v spiskakh poluchateley subsidii dlya uluchsheniya zhilishchnykh usloviy kak invalida vtoroy gruppy. Trebovanie udovletvoreno, poskol ku ustanovleno, chto istitsa neobosnovanno byla isklyuchena iz svodnogo spiska poluchateley subsidii na priobretenie zhil ya .
Gimgina M.E. Problema obespecheniya konstitutsionnoy sudebnoy zashchity prav i svobod cheloveka i grazhdanina v gosudarstvakh evropeyskogo regiona // Rossiyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. 2013. № 4 (91). S. 138-140.
Informatsionnoe pis mo Arbitrazhnogo treteyskogo suda g. Moskvy ot 10.06.2015 N 480 quot;Statistika rassmotreniya sporov Arbitrazhnym treteyskim sudom goroda Moskvy za pervyy kvartal 2015 goda quot;.
Kayumova A.R. YUrisdiktsionnye printsipy zashchity i universal nosti: nekotorye problemy sootnosheniya // Vestnik Volzhskogo universiteta im. V.N. Tatishcheva. 2015. № 2 (82). S. 83-87.
Kolosova N.M. O konstitutsionnom prave kazhdogo na mezhdunarodnuyu sudebnuyu zashchitu v Rossii // ZHurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2012. № 4 (184). S. 72-77.
Konstitutsiya Respubliki Dagestan (prinyata Konstitutsionnym Sobraniem 10.07.2003) (red. ot 04.12.2015) // Sobranie zakonodatel stva Respubliki Dagestan. 2003. N 7. st. 503; Dagestanskaya pravda. N 497. 09.12.2015.
Konstitutsiya Respubliki Kareliya (prinyata VS KASSR 30.05.1978, izlozhena v novoy redaktsii Zakonom RK ot 12.02.2001 N 473-ZRK) (red. ot 10.02.2016) // Sobranie zakonodatel stva RK. № 2. 2001. st. 106; Ofitsial nyy internet-portal pravovoy informatsii http://www.pravo.gov.ru, 11.02.2016.
Konstitutsiya Respubliki Krym (prinyata Gosudarstvennym Sovetom Respubliki Krym 11.04.2014) // Krymskie izvestiya. N 68(5479). 12.04.2014.
Konstitutsiya Respubliki Mariy El ot 24.06.1995 (red. ot 31.07.2014) // Mariyskaya pravda. 07.07.1995; Ofitsial nyy internet-portal Respubliki Mariy El http://www.portal.mari.ru, 01.08.2014.
Konstitutsiya Respubliki Tatarstan ot 06.11.1992 (red. ot 22.06.2012) // Respublika Tatarstan quot;. N 87-88. 30.04.2002; quot;Respublika Tatarstan quot;. 26.06.2012
Kravets I.A. Pravo konstitutsii v deystvii: sootnoshenie zakonodatel noy i sudebnoy konstitutsionalizatsii pravoporyadka, obespecheniya mezhdunarodnykh obyazatel stv, prav i svobod // Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal noe pravo. 2015. № 12. S. 12-15.
Makartsev A.A. Printsip verkhovenstva Konstitutsii RF: problemy obespecheniya pri realizatsii resheniy Evropeyskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka po voprosam izbiratel nogo prava // Vestnik Novosibirskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Pravo. 2015. T. 11. № 3. S. 141-146.
Osminin B.I. Prinyatie i realizatsiya mezhdunarodnykh dogovornykh obyazatel stv federativnymi gosudarstvami // ZHurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel stva i sravnitel nogo pravovedeniya. 2015. № 3. S. 455-464.
Postanovlenie Administratsii Karachaevskogo gorodskogo okruga Karachaevo-CHerkesskoy Respubliki ot 29.06.2012 N 902 quot;Ob utverzhdenii Poryadka dosudebnogo (vnesudebnogo) obzhalovaniya resheniy i deystviy (bezdeystviya) Administratsii Karachaevskogo gorodskogo okruga i ee dolzhnostnykh lits, munitsipal nykh sluzhashchikh pri predostavlenii munitsipal nykh uslug quot; // Dokument ofitsial no ne opublikovan. SPS Konsul tant plyus .
Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 14.07.2015 N 21-P Po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti polozheniy stat i 1 Federal nogo zakona quot;O ratifikatsii Konventsii o zashchite prav cheloveka i osnovnykh svobod i Protokolov k ney quot;, punktov 1 i 2 stat i 32 Federal nogo zakona quot;O mezhdunarodnykh dogovorakh Rossiyskoy Federatsii quot;, chastey pervoy i chetvertoy stat i 11, punkta 4 chasti chetvertoy stat i 392 Grazhdanskogo protsessual nogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii, chastey 1 i 4 stat i 13, punkta 4 chasti 3 stat i 311 Arbitrazhnogo protsessual nogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii, chastey 1 i 4 stat i 15, punkta 4 chasti 1 stat i 350 Kodeksa administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva Rossiyskoy Federatsii i punkta 2 chasti chetvertoy stat i 413 Ugolovno-protsessual nogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii v svyazi s zaprosom gruppy deputatov Gosudarstvennoy Dumy // Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF. 2015. N 30. st. 4658.
Postanovlenie Pravitel stva Kamchatskogo kraya ot 01.04.2008 N 81-P (red. ot 14.06.2013) quot;O Poryadke dosudebnogo obzhalovaniya deystviy (bezdeystviy), resheniy ispolnitel nykh organov gosudarstvennoy vlasti Kamchatskogo kraya, ikh dolzhnostnykh lits quot; // Ofitsial nye Vedomosti. N 53. 15.04.2008; N 134-137. 27.06.2013.
Prikaz Departamenta SMI i reklamy g. Moskvy ot 15.05.2014 N 02-55-37/14 quot;Ob utverzhdenii Polozheniya o poryadke dosudebnogo (vnesudebnogo) obzhalovaniya resheniy i deystviy (bezdeystviya) Departamenta pri predostavlenii gosudarstvennykh uslug quot;Vydacha razresheniya na ustanovku i ekspluatatsiyu reklamnoy konstruktsii quot; i quot;Annulirovanie razresheniya na ustanovku i ekspluatatsiyu reklamnoy konstruktsii quot; // Dokument ofitsial no ne opublikovan. SPS Konsul tant plyus .
Samovich YU.V. Pravo na mezhdunarodnuyu sudebnuyu zashchitu kak absolyutnoe pravo individa // Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kul turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. 2012. № 3-2. S. 151-158.
Sevost yanov A.A. TSeli yurisdiktsionnogo yuridicheskogo protsessa // Kazanskaya nauka. 2013. № 4. S. 163-166.
Solov eva T.V. Ob otsutstvii edinogo normativno zakreplennogo poryadka privedeniya v ispolnenie postanovleniy Evropeyskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. 2013. № 4. S. 184-200.
Statistika obrashcheniy grazhdan v organy prokuratury, dannye ofitsial nogo sayta Prokuratury Respubliki Tatarstan Elektronnyy resurs http://prokrt.ru /main/news1/prokuratura tatarstana obobwila rezultaty raboty s obraweniyami grazhdan/ (dostup - svobodnyy, data obrashcheniya - 27.08.2020).
Sudebnaya praktika Verkhovnogo suda Respubliki Tatarstan Sud nepravomerno treboval dosudebnogo uregulirovaniya spora, kotoryy dlya dannoy kategorii del ne predusmotren // Pravosudie v Tatarstane. N 4. 2005.
Tokareva A.A. Razvitie federalizm kak faktor, vliyayushchiy na mezhdunarodnuyu deyatel nost sub ektov Rossiyskoy Federatsii // V sbornike: YUridicheskie nauki: problemy i perspektivy Materialy III Mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii. Kazan , 2015. S. 214-218.

right to appeal, constitutional law, administrative justice, federal subject, regional legislation, human rights.