Problems of the methods use of belief and compulsion in management activities
( Pp. 201-208)

More about authors
Kravets Ivan Petrovich Management and Law, Department of State Law Disciplines
Volga State University of Water Transport
Nizhniy Novgorod, Russia Butchenko Victor Nikolaevich PhD (Law). Position: Head of the Department of State Law Disciplines.
Volgas State University of Water Transport
For read the full article, please, register or log in
The article examines the issues of using methods of persuasion and coercion in management activities, where persuasion is a liberal method of influencing the consciousness of a subject subject, since it assumes, on the basis of a verbal, educational, organizational, incentive or other creative act, a voluntary and conscious perception of expediency by him - the prescribed nature of the activity, and, on the contrary, coercion as an imperious binding influence on the coerced is associated with the imposition of an imperious will on subordinate persons, the suppression of antisocial motives from them and with the possibility of implementing the sanction of an imperative prescription. It always contradicts the will of the needy, implicitly fits into the system of his ideas and requires obedience to dictates with which he internally or externally does not agree, and thus differs from conviction. The purpose of the presented study is to consider the issues of scientific support in the system of public administration that arise in this area. As you know, the legal nature of the Russian state has brought to life democratic and socio-political mechanisms for the distribution of the main state-power functions. Therefore, the state, modeling its activities by legal means, is guided by the principles of retention and dispersal of its powers of authority among various government bodies, ensuring the implementation of a single national policy. Thus, having concentrated a certain part of its social and power resources on the goal of rational organization and functioning of all the structures it needs, the state is called upon to serve at the same time the vital needs of society. This social conditioning and causality of an adequate response to the requests of both the state itself and society anticipated the justification for the existence of power coercion in the account of the state. Proceeding from this, state-power coercion received its existence from the state as an exponent of the objective interests and needs of the extraterritorial population. At the same time, relying on state authority and the real power of the state apparatus, state coercion is placed on a protective basis - the protection of the legal regulations of the state. Based on the study, the authors come to the conclusion that it is quite obvious that state coercion is characterized as a method of ensuring law and order, applied strictly on a legal basis, as a rule, by specially authorized state bodies, only to specific subjects of law in connection with their illegal actions or by virtue of public, state necessity, by adopting acts of application of law.
How to Cite:
Kravets I.P., Butchenko V.N., (2021), PROBLEMS OF THE METHODS USE OF BELIEF AND COMPULSION IN MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 1: 201-208.
Reference list:
Atamanchuk G.V. Teoriya gosudarstvennogo upravleniya: Kurs lektsiy. M., 1997. S. 39 - 43.
Baranov V.M. Pooshchritel nye normy sovetskogo sotsialisticheskogo prava / Pod red. M.I. Baytina. Saratov, 1978. S. 4 - 7.
Bakhrakh D.N. Vidy administrativnogo prinuzhdeniya // Problemy sovershenstvovaniya zakonodatel stva ob administrativnoy otvetstvennosti: Uchen. zap. VNIISZ. Vyp. 5. M., 1965. S. 92.
Baytin M.I. Gosudarstvo i politicheskaya vlast (teoreticheskoe issledovanie): Avtoref. dis. ... d-ra yurid. nauk. M., 1973. S. 8.
Bertsinskiy S. Predmet sovetskogo administrativnogo prava i metod ego izucheniya // Problemy sotsialisticheskogo prava. 1939. N 2. S. 66.
Bel skiy K.S. Fenomenologiya administrativnogo prava. Smolensk, 1995. S. 31.
Bel skiy K.S. Politseyskoe pravo: Lektsionnyy kurs / Pod red. A.V. Kurakina. M., 2004. S. 619
Bratus S.N. YUridicheskaya otvetstvennost i zakonnost (ocherk teorii). M., 2001. S. 42 - 44
Bratus S.N. YUridicheskaya otvetstvennost i zakonnost (ocherk teorii). M., 2001. S. 49 - 50.
Gegel G.V.F. Raboty raznykh let: V 2 t. T. 2. M., 1970. S. 301 - 302.
Gorshenev V.M. Sposoby i organizatsionnye formy pravovogo regulirovaniya v sotsialisticheskom obshchestve. M., 1972. S. 73.
Kozyubra N.I. Ubezhdenie i prinuzhdenie v sovetskom prave na sovremennom etape kommunisticheskogo stroitel stva: Avtoref. dis.. kand. yurid. nauk. Kiev, 1968. S. 7.
Kozyubra K.I. Ubezhdenie i prinuzhdenie v sovetskom prave na sovremennom etape kommunisticheskogo stroitel stva: Avtoref. dis.. kand. yurid. nauk. Kiev, 1968. S. 6 - 7.
Kolosova N.M. Konstitutsionnaya otvetstvennost v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: Otvetstvennost organov gosudarstvennoy vlasti i inykh sub ektov prava za narushenie konstitutsionnogo zakonodatel stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii. M., 2000. S. 109 - 138.
Konin N.M. Organizatsionno-pravovye osnovy gosudarstvennogo upravleniya sotsialisticheskim obshchestvennym proizvodstvom (administrativno-pravovoe issledovanie): Dis.. d-ra yurid. nauk. Saratov, 1977. S. 267.
Kononov P.I. Zakonodatel stvo ob administrativnom prinuzhdenii: problemy kodifikatsii // ZHurnal rossiyskogo prava. 1998. N 8. S. 31.
Korkunov N.M. Lektsii po obshchey teorii prava. SPb., 2003. S. 102.
Lazarev B.M. Kompetentsiya organov upravleniya. M., 1972. S. 37.
Leyst O.E. Sushchnost prava. Problemy teorii i filosofii prava. M., 2002. S. 60.
Luchin V.O. Teoreticheskie problemy realizatsii konstitutsionnykh norm: Avtoref. dis.. d-ra yurid. nauk. M., 1993. S. 60 - 76.
Mamut L.S. Gosudarstvo v tsennostnom izmerenii. M., 1998. S. 17 - 27.
Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 11 dekabrya 1998 g. N 28-P // SZ RF. 1998. N 52. St. 6447.
Rebane I. Ubezhdenie i prinuzhdenie v dele bor by s posyagatel stvami na sovetskiy pravoporyadok // Trudy po pravovedeniyu: Uchen. zap. Tartuskogo gos. un-ta. Vyp. 182. Tartu, 1966. S. 180.
Seregina V.V. Gosudarstvennoe prinuzhdenie po sovetskomu pravu / Nauch. red. I.A. Galagan. Voronezh, 1991. S. 20.
Starilov YU.N. Administrativnoe pravo: V 2 ch. CH. 2. Kniga vtoraya: Formy i metody upravlencheskikh deystviy. Pravovye akty upravleniya. Administrativnyy dogovor. Administrativnaya yustitsiya. Voronezh, 2001. S. 32.
Starilov YU.N. Administrativnaya yustitsiya: problemy teorii. Voronezh, 1998. S. 34.
Studenikina M.S. Zakonodatel stvo ob administrativnoy otvetstvennosti i problemy ego kodifikatsii: Avtoref. dis.. kand. yurid. nauk. M., 1968. S. 7 - 8.
Tarasov I.T. Kratkiy ocherk nauki administrativnogo prava: Konspekt lektsiy. T. 1. YAroslavl , 1888. S. 188 - 189.
Khaikin Ya.Z. The structure and interaction of moral and legal systems. M., 1972.S. 240
Ebzeev B.S. Man, people, state in the constitutional order of the Russian Federation. M., 2005.S. 213 - 214
persuasion, method, coercion, managerial activity, state-power functions.