Admissibility and reliability of the evidence in criminal procedural law
( Pp. 144-149)
More about authors
Alexey P. Popov
Pyatigorsk State University
Pyatigorsk, Russia Zinchenko Igor Anatolyevich kand. yurid. nauk, docent, docent kafedry gosudarstvenno-pravovyh disciplin
Moscow International University, Kaliningrad branch Popov Artem Alekseevich Cand.Sci.(Law), First Deputy General Director
LLC "TER-Engineering"
Moscow, Russia
Pyatigorsk State University
Pyatigorsk, Russia Zinchenko Igor Anatolyevich kand. yurid. nauk, docent, docent kafedry gosudarstvenno-pravovyh disciplin
Moscow International University, Kaliningrad branch Popov Artem Alekseevich Cand.Sci.(Law), First Deputy General Director
LLC "TER-Engineering"
Moscow, Russia
Abstract:
Task: identification of the real role of the admissibility of evidence, its relationship with the property of admissibility of evidence in criminal procedural evidence Methods: dialectical, formal legal, comparative legal. Results: the authors are not inclined to include the property of reliability of evidence in criminal cases, in the composition of the legal properties that determine their admissibility. Subjects of proof have the right to accept or reject attributable factual data collected in accordance with the procedure established by law by the property of reliability, however, both of them appear in criminal cases as evidence.
How to Cite:
Alexey P.P., Zinchenko I.A., Popov A.A., (2021), ADMISSIBILITY AND RELIABILITY OF THE EVIDENCE IN CRIMINAL PROCEDURAL LAW. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 1 => 144-149.
Reference list:
Gmyrko V.P., Zinchenko I.A. Paradoksy dokazatel stvennogo prava // Biblioteka kriminalista. Nauchnyy zhurnal. 2014. № 2 (13). S. 9-17.
ZHdanova YA.V. Problemy veroyatnogo i dostovernogo v ugolovno-protsessual nom dokazyvanii i ikh vliyanie na prinyatie otdel nykh protsessual nykh resheniy sledovateley: avtoref. dis. kand. yurid. nauk. Izhevsk, 2004. 35 s.
Ishmaeva T.P. Dostovernost dokazatel stv v ugolovnom protsesse // Vestnik CHelyabinskogo gos. un-ta. Ser. Pravo . 2016. T. 1. Vyp. 3. S. 81-85.
Komissarova YA.V. Problemy polucheniya, proverki i otsenki pokazaniya v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve: videolektsiya // Mezhdunarodnaya assotsiatsiya sodeystviya pravosudiyu / URL: http://www.iuaj.net/node/2821
Kostenko R.V. Novoe ponimanie sushchnosti dokazatel stv v rossiyskom ugolovnom protsesse // Biblioteka kriminalista. Nauchnyy zhurnal. 2013. № 4 (8). S. 170-183.
Mironov V.YU. Dostovernost dokazatel stv i ikh znachenie pri postanovlenii prigovora: avtoref. dis. kand. yurid. nauk. CHelyabinsk, 2005. 23 s.
Ovsyannikov I.V. Problema dostovernosti dokazatel stv v dokazatel stvennom prave Rossii // Sovremennoe pravo. 2004. № 7. S. 35-41.
Popov A.P. Usloviya optimizatsii tseli dokazyvaniya. Rezul taty ORD: rezervy optimizatsii USP // CHernye dyry v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2006. № 2. S. 300-302.
Popov A.P., Popov A.A. Protsessual no-pravovaya priroda pokazaniy v ugolovnom protsesse: komparativistskiy vzglyad // Vestnik Kaliningradskogo filiala Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. 2015. № 1 (39). S. 43-46.
Popov A.P., Popova I.A., Zinchenko I.A. Problemy sovremennogo ugolovno-protsessual nogo dokazatel stvennogo prava: monografiya. Pyatigorsk: RIA na KMV, 2019. 196 s.
Popov A.P., Popova I.A. Reglamentatsiya rezul tatov operativno-razysknoy deyatel nosti v ugolovno-protsessual nom prave // Vestnik Kaliningradskogo filiala Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. 2013. № 1 (31). S. 7-11.
Popova I.A. Reglamentatsiya uchastiya spetsialista v ugolovnom protsesse: problemy i perspektivy // Vestnik Kaliningradskogo filiala Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. 2013. № 2 (32). S. 103-107.
Teoriya dokazatel stv v sovetskom ugolovnom protsesse / otv. red. N.V. ZHogin. - 2-e izd., perab. i dop. - M.: YUrid. lit., 1973. 736 s.
ZHdanova YA.V. Problemy veroyatnogo i dostovernogo v ugolovno-protsessual nom dokazyvanii i ikh vliyanie na prinyatie otdel nykh protsessual nykh resheniy sledovateley: avtoref. dis. kand. yurid. nauk. Izhevsk, 2004. 35 s.
Ishmaeva T.P. Dostovernost dokazatel stv v ugolovnom protsesse // Vestnik CHelyabinskogo gos. un-ta. Ser. Pravo . 2016. T. 1. Vyp. 3. S. 81-85.
Komissarova YA.V. Problemy polucheniya, proverki i otsenki pokazaniya v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve: videolektsiya // Mezhdunarodnaya assotsiatsiya sodeystviya pravosudiyu / URL: http://www.iuaj.net/node/2821
Kostenko R.V. Novoe ponimanie sushchnosti dokazatel stv v rossiyskom ugolovnom protsesse // Biblioteka kriminalista. Nauchnyy zhurnal. 2013. № 4 (8). S. 170-183.
Mironov V.YU. Dostovernost dokazatel stv i ikh znachenie pri postanovlenii prigovora: avtoref. dis. kand. yurid. nauk. CHelyabinsk, 2005. 23 s.
Ovsyannikov I.V. Problema dostovernosti dokazatel stv v dokazatel stvennom prave Rossii // Sovremennoe pravo. 2004. № 7. S. 35-41.
Popov A.P. Usloviya optimizatsii tseli dokazyvaniya. Rezul taty ORD: rezervy optimizatsii USP // CHernye dyry v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2006. № 2. S. 300-302.
Popov A.P., Popov A.A. Protsessual no-pravovaya priroda pokazaniy v ugolovnom protsesse: komparativistskiy vzglyad // Vestnik Kaliningradskogo filiala Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. 2015. № 1 (39). S. 43-46.
Popov A.P., Popova I.A., Zinchenko I.A. Problemy sovremennogo ugolovno-protsessual nogo dokazatel stvennogo prava: monografiya. Pyatigorsk: RIA na KMV, 2019. 196 s.
Popov A.P., Popova I.A. Reglamentatsiya rezul tatov operativno-razysknoy deyatel nosti v ugolovno-protsessual nom prave // Vestnik Kaliningradskogo filiala Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. 2013. № 1 (31). S. 7-11.
Popova I.A. Reglamentatsiya uchastiya spetsialista v ugolovnom protsesse: problemy i perspektivy // Vestnik Kaliningradskogo filiala Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. 2013. № 2 (32). S. 103-107.
Teoriya dokazatel stv v sovetskom ugolovnom protsesse / otv. red. N.V. ZHogin. - 2-e izd., perab. i dop. - M.: YUrid. lit., 1973. 736 s.
Keywords:
evidence law, evidence, sources of evidence, reliability of evidence, admissibility of evidence.
Related Articles
PUBLIC LAW (STATE LAW) Pages: 29-35 Issue №24067
«Technical Company» as an Evidence in Disputes of Unreasonable Tax Benefit
technical company
subject of proof
tax process
evidence
proof.
Show more
miscellaneous Pages: 235-240 Issue №46030
The Evolution of Evidence and Evidence in the Domestic Criminal Process
evolution
evidence
proof
criminal procedure
Ancient Russia
Show more
7. CRIMINAL LAW (5.1.4.) Pages: 342-348 Issue №21729
From Polygraph to New Technologies, Detection of Perjury in Criminal Proceedings
polygraph
proof
conclusion of a polygraph examiner
admissibility of evidence
evaluation of evidence
Show more
15. CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Pages: 317-321 Issue №18204
The significance of the law enforcement intelligence operations results as evidence in criminal procedure
evidence
the results of operational investigations
criminal proceedings
Show more
5. PUBLIC LAW (STATE LAW) (5.1.2.) Pages: 260-266 Issue №21729
Expertise as a Form of Evidence in the Tax Process
expertise
evidence
tax process
means of proof
decision
Show more
8. Criminal procedure Pages: 202-206 Issue №6840
TRADITIONAL AND NEW APPROACHES TO THE LEGALLY DEFINITIONS OF "EVIDENCE" IN CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
the criminal process
the comparativism
law of evidence
proof
sources of evidence
Show more
7. Criminal law, Criminal enforcement law, Criminology Pages: 193-196 Issue №4088
PROBLEM LEGAL NATURE OF THE STAGE OF INITIATE CRIMINAL PROCEEDING
the stage of excitation of criminal case
the availability of criminal justice
proof
sources of evidence
Show more
CRIMINAL LAW (5.1.4.) Pages: 233-238 Issue №24238
Concept and Classification of Evidence Presented During Interrogation
evidence
interrogation
credibility
admissibility
relativity
Show more
INTERNATIONAL LAW Pages: 273-279 Issue №24870
The Impact of Information Technology on the Process of Evidence in Criminal Proceedings
information technologies
criminal proceedings
evidence
proving
artificial intelligence technologies
Show more
7. Criminal procedure Pages: 158-161 Issue №5413
BODY SEARCH IN THE CONTEXT OF APPROPRIATE MEANS OF COLLECTING PHYSICAL EVIDENCES IN PRE-TRIAL INQUIRY
personal search
the detention of the suspect
evidence
the proper way of gathering evidence
pre-trial criminal proceedings
Show more