PROBLEMS OF LEGAL REGULATION OF THE FORM OF PETITIONS OF DEFENSE COUNSEL FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF A PRELIMINARY HEARING IN COURT WITH THE PARTICIPATION OF JURORS
( Pp. 216-219)
More about authors
Shigurov Alexander V.
Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Criminal Procedure Law and criminalistics of the Faculty of Law
Middle-Volga Institute (branch) of the All-Russian State University of Justice (RPA of the Ministry of Justice of Russia)
Saransk, Russian Federation Shigurova Elena I. Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor; Associate Professor of the Department of Criminal Procedure, Justice and Prosecutorial Supervision of the Law Institute
National Research Mordovia State University
Saransk, Republic of Mordovia, Russian Federation
Middle-Volga Institute (branch) of the All-Russian State University of Justice (RPA of the Ministry of Justice of Russia)
Saransk, Russian Federation Shigurova Elena I. Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor; Associate Professor of the Department of Criminal Procedure, Justice and Prosecutorial Supervision of the Law Institute
National Research Mordovia State University
Saransk, Republic of Mordovia, Russian Federation
Abstract:
The article analyzes the provisions of the law, the legal positions of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, the judicial practice on the application and the permission of the defense lawyer's petitions on the appointment of a preliminary hearing in court with the participation of jurors. Conclusions are drawn about the shortcomings of the legal regulation, recommendations on the behavior of the defense lawyer have been worked out when drawing up an application for a preliminary hearing. The article contains author's generalizations, conclusions and proposals that can be used in advocacy.
How to Cite:
Shigurov A.V., Shigurova E.I., (2017), PROBLEMS OF LEGAL REGULATION OF THE FORM OF PETITIONS OF DEFENSE COUNSEL FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF A PRELIMINARY HEARING IN COURT WITH THE PARTICIPATION OF JURORS. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 4 => 216-219.
Reference list:
Obzor sudebnoy raboty garnizonnykh voennykh sudov po rassmotreniyu ugolovnykh del za 2005 god. Dostup iz spravochno-pravovoy sistemy Konsul tantPlyus .
Obzor sudebnoy praktiki po ugolovnym delam za sentyabr 2011 goda (podgotovlen Belgorodskim oblastnym sudom). Dostup iz spravochno-pravovoy sistemy Konsul tantPlyus .
Opredelenie Sudebnoy kollegii po ugolovnym delam Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 8 fevralya 2006 g. № 53-o05-88. Dostup iz spravochno-pravovoy sistemy Konsul tantPlyus .
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 22.12.2009 № 28 O primenenii sudami norm ugolovno-protsessual nogo zakonodatel stva, reguliruyushchikh podgotovku ugolovnogo dela k sudebnomu razbiratel stvu // Rossiyskaya gazeta. - 2010. - 13 yanvarya.
Postanovlenie Prezidiuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 08.12.2010 № 294P10. Dostup iz spravochno-pravovoy sistemy Konsul tantPlyus .
Ryabinina T. K. Osobennosti priostanovleniya proizvodstva po ugolovnomu delu v stadii naznacheniya sudebnogo zasedaniya // Zakonnost . - 2016. - № 4. - S. 55-57.
Sushkova YU. N. Dokazatel stvennaya baza etnicheskogo pravosudiya u mordvy // Regionologiya. - 2006. - № 3. - S. 242-253.
Sushkova YU. N. Institut nakazaniya v obychnom prave mordvy // Rossiyskaya nauka teorii i istorii gosudarstva i prava v nachale XXI veka: Sbornik nauchnykh statey. - SPb., 2010. - S. 112-124.
Ugolovno-protsessual nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Glavy 33-56. Postateynyy nauchno-prakticheskiy kommentariy / E.K. Antonovich, P.V. Volosyuk, L.A. Voskobitova i dr.; otv. red. L.A. Voskobitova. M.: Redaktsiya Rossiyskoy gazety , 2015. Vyp. V-VI. Dostup iz spravochno-pravovoy sistemy Konsul tantPlyus .
SHigurov A. V. Zakrytaya forma predvaritel nogo slushaniya po ugolovnym delam: kriticheskiy vzglyad // Lex russica. - 2014. - № 5. - S. 556-563.
SHigurov A. V. KHodataystvo advokata-zashchitnika o naznachenii predvaritel nogo slushaniya: problemy praktiki i zakonodatel nogo regulirovaniya // Advokatskaya praktika. - 2011. - № 6. - S. 13-16.
SHigurova E. I. Problemy realizatsii polnomochiy advokata-zashchitnika v podgotovitel noy chasti sudebnogo zasedaniya s uchastiem prisyazhnykh zasedateley // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. - 2017. - № 3. - S. 369-373.
Obzor sudebnoy praktiki po ugolovnym delam za sentyabr 2011 goda (podgotovlen Belgorodskim oblastnym sudom). Dostup iz spravochno-pravovoy sistemy Konsul tantPlyus .
Opredelenie Sudebnoy kollegii po ugolovnym delam Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 8 fevralya 2006 g. № 53-o05-88. Dostup iz spravochno-pravovoy sistemy Konsul tantPlyus .
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 22.12.2009 № 28 O primenenii sudami norm ugolovno-protsessual nogo zakonodatel stva, reguliruyushchikh podgotovku ugolovnogo dela k sudebnomu razbiratel stvu // Rossiyskaya gazeta. - 2010. - 13 yanvarya.
Postanovlenie Prezidiuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 08.12.2010 № 294P10. Dostup iz spravochno-pravovoy sistemy Konsul tantPlyus .
Ryabinina T. K. Osobennosti priostanovleniya proizvodstva po ugolovnomu delu v stadii naznacheniya sudebnogo zasedaniya // Zakonnost . - 2016. - № 4. - S. 55-57.
Sushkova YU. N. Dokazatel stvennaya baza etnicheskogo pravosudiya u mordvy // Regionologiya. - 2006. - № 3. - S. 242-253.
Sushkova YU. N. Institut nakazaniya v obychnom prave mordvy // Rossiyskaya nauka teorii i istorii gosudarstva i prava v nachale XXI veka: Sbornik nauchnykh statey. - SPb., 2010. - S. 112-124.
Ugolovno-protsessual nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Glavy 33-56. Postateynyy nauchno-prakticheskiy kommentariy / E.K. Antonovich, P.V. Volosyuk, L.A. Voskobitova i dr.; otv. red. L.A. Voskobitova. M.: Redaktsiya Rossiyskoy gazety , 2015. Vyp. V-VI. Dostup iz spravochno-pravovoy sistemy Konsul tantPlyus .
SHigurov A. V. Zakrytaya forma predvaritel nogo slushaniya po ugolovnym delam: kriticheskiy vzglyad // Lex russica. - 2014. - № 5. - S. 556-563.
SHigurov A. V. KHodataystvo advokata-zashchitnika o naznachenii predvaritel nogo slushaniya: problemy praktiki i zakonodatel nogo regulirovaniya // Advokatskaya praktika. - 2011. - № 6. - S. 13-16.
SHigurova E. I. Problemy realizatsii polnomochiy advokata-zashchitnika v podgotovitel noy chasti sudebnogo zasedaniya s uchastiem prisyazhnykh zasedateley // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. - 2017. - № 3. - S. 369-373.
