MODERN CONSTITUTIONAL AND STRUCTURAL RISK CORRELATION
( Pp. 11-14)

More about authors
Novikova Alevtina E. kand. yurid. nauk, docent, docent kafedry konstitucionnogo i mezhdunarodnogo prava
Belgorod National Research University Samsonov Valeriy Nikolaevich d-r yurid. nauk, professor. Dolzhnost: professor. Podrazdelenie: kafedra konstitucionnogo i mezhdunarodnogo prava.
Belgorod state national research university Tabolin Vladimir Victorovich d-r yurid. nauk, professor. Dolzhnost: professor. Podrazdelenie: kafedra konstitucionnogo i mezhdunarodnogo prava.
Belgorod state national research university
Abstract:
The development of the theory of human rights risks involves the disclosure of their definitive, regulatory, variable and minimizing aspects. In this regard, the article presents the results of the analysis of the text of the modern Russian Constitution in order to identify articles in it that mediate risks to the realization of individual rights and freedoms. Interest in the human rights type of risks is determined by the constitutional axiology of a person, his rights and freedoms. In the study, the authors used a classification method that allowed them to systematize constitutional risks. It is established that the modern constitutional model is characterized by a minimum number of regulations that are sources of risks for a person, his rights and freedoms. This is the difference between the modern Constitution and the basic laws of the Soviet period. The following types of risks were found among the stated risks: title risks, interpretative risks, and gaps. In General, the results of scientific developments of risks in constitutional law science, as well as the legalization of various aspects of such risks, are characterized by diffuseness, which complements the official and conceptual components of the theory of risks in law.
How to Cite:
Novikova A.E., Samsonov V.N., Tabolin V.V., (2019), MODERN CONSTITUTIONAL AND STRUCTURAL RISK CORRELATION. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 7 => 11-14.
Reference list:
Avak yan S.A. Konstitutsiya Rossii: priroda, evolyutsiya, sovremennost . M.: RYUID Sashko , 2000. 528 s.
Avak yan S.A. Nuzhna li konstitutsionnaya reforma v Rossii // Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal noe pravo. 2012. № 9. S. 2-9.
Barkhatova E.YU. Kommentariy k Konstitutsii Rossiyskoy Federatsii (postateynyy). Moskva: Prospekt, 2015. 272 s.
Borisevich M. M. Razdelenie vlastey: problemy i puti resheniya // Sovremennaya nauka: aktual nye problemy teorii i praktiki. Seriya: Ekonomika i pravo. 2014. № 3-4. S. 49-52.
Kartashkin V.A., Vikhryan A.P. Konstitutsiya Rossii: prava i svobody cheloveka // Sovremennoe pravo. 2018. № 12. S. 20-28.
Knyazev S.D. Stabil nost Konstitutsii i ee znachenie dlya sovremennogo rossiyskogo konstitutsionalizma // Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal noe pravo. 2015. № 1. S. 4-12.
Kozlova E.I., Kutafin O.E. Konstitutsionnoe pravo Rossii. M.: Prospekt, 2013. 565 s.
Kolesnikov E.V. Konstitutsiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii kak osnova sovershenstvovaniya i razvitiya rossiyskogo zakonodatel stva // Gosudarstvennaya vlast i mestnoe samoupravlenie. 2019. № 1. S. 43-47.
Kommentariy k Konstitutsii Rossiyskoy Federatsii / pod red. V.D. Zor kina, L.V. Lazareva. M.: Eksmo, 2009. 1056 s.
Novikova A.E. Ponyatie i sushchnost pravozashchitnykh riskov // Nauchnye vedomosti Belgorodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Pravo. 2011. № 14 (109). S. 151-156.
Prava cheloveka / otv. red. E.A. Lukasheva. M.: NORMA, 2009. 559 s.
Strashun B.A. Ne speshit s konstitutsionnoy reformoy // Konstitutsiya kak faktor sotsial nykh izmeneniy: Sbornik dokladov. M., 1999. S. 86.
KHabrieva T.YA. Reformirovanie Konstitutsii Rossiyskoy Federatsii: vozmozhnost i neobkhodimost // ZHurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2003. № 11. 20-32.
CHirkin V.E. Konstitutsiya: rossiyskaya model . M., 2002. 160 s.
Ebzeev B.S. Konstitutsiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii: pryamoe deystvie i usloviya realizatsii // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2008. № 7. S. 5-15.
Keywords:
risk, Constitution, reform, constitutional and legal theory of risks, human rights risks.