THE COMPARATIVE AND LEGAL ANALYSIS OF DIFFERENTIATION OF CONTRACTUAL AND DELICTUAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE HARM DONE OWING TO SHORTCOMINGS OF GOODS, WORKS OR SERVICES IN THE CURRENT LEGISLATION OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION
( Pp. 45-49)
More about authors
Mamin Andrey Sergeevich
docent, kandidat yuridicheskih nauk kafedry administrativnogo i mezhdunarodnogo prava.
Law Institute of Belgorod state University Khalin Roman V. prepodavatel kafedry ugolovnogo processa
Belgorod Law Institute of Ministry of the Internal of the Russian Federation named after I.D. Putilin
Law Institute of Belgorod state University Khalin Roman V. prepodavatel kafedry ugolovnogo processa
Belgorod Law Institute of Ministry of the Internal of the Russian Federation named after I.D. Putilin
Abstract:
This article presents a comparative legal analysis of the problems of delimitation of the contractual and tort liability for damage caused by defective goods, works or services according to the current legislation of the Russian Federation. It focuses on the characteristic features of the delimitation of the contractual and tort liability for damage caused by defective goods, works or services. Identified and the necessity of the division of obligations on the contractual and tort. On the basis of the conducted research the author suggests that the criterion of differentiation of contractual and tort liability in case of causing harm to a defect in the goods is the focus of the malware.
How to Cite:
Mamin A.S., Khalin R.V., (2013), THE COMPARATIVE AND LEGAL ANALYSIS OF DIFFERENTIATION OF CONTRACTUAL AND DELICTUAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE HARM DONE OWING TO SHORTCOMINGS OF GOODS, WORKS OR SERVICES IN THE CURRENT LEGISLATION OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION. Business in Law, 6: 45-49.
Reference list:
Belykh V.S. Kachestvo tovarov v angliyskom dogovore kupli-prodazhi. M.: Standarty, 1991. S. 46.
Belyakova A.M. Grazhdansko-pravovaya otvetstvennost za prichinenie vreda. M.: Izdatel stvo Moskovskogo universiteta, 1986; Markova O.A. Sootnoshenie dogovornoy i deliktnoy otvetstvennosti v sfere zashchity prav potrebiteley // Pravo i ekonomika. 2010. №9. S.39 i dr.
Genkin D. M. Pravo sobstvennosti v SSSR. M.: Gosyurizdat, 1961. S.197.
Grazhdanskoe pravo: Uchebnik (chast 1) / Otv. red. V.P. Mozolin, A.I. Maslyaev. M.: quot;YUrist quot;, 2005. (avtor glavy N.M. Frolova).
Degtyarev S.L. Vozmeshchenie ubytkov v grazhdanskom i arbitrazhnom protsesse. 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. M.: Volters Kluver, 2003; Matveev YU.G. Ukaz. soch. S.26-27.
Ershov V.A., Sutyagin A.V., Kayl A.N. Postateynyy kommentariy k Grazhdanskomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii // SPS Konsul tant Plyus: Kommentarii zakonodatel stva, 2009.
Ershov O.G. Problemy vozmeshcheniya vreda, prichinennogo vsledstvie nedostatkov raboty pri dolevom stroitel stve zhil ya // Pravo i politika. 2008. №10. S.2478-2482.
Ioffe O.S. Obyazatel stvennoe pravo. M.: YUridicheskaya literatura, 1975. S.865.
Komarov A.S. Otvetstvennost v kommercheskom oborote. M.: YUridicheskaya literatura, 1991. S.159.
Kommentariy k Grazhdanskomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii, chasti vtoroy (postateynyy). 5-e izd., ispr. i dop. / Pod red. O.N. Sadikova. M.: quot;KONTRAKT quot;, quot;INFRA-M quot;, 2006.
Kulagin M.I. Izbrannye trudy po aktsionernomu i torgovomu pravu. 2-e izd., ispr. // Predprinimatel stvo i pravo: opyt zapada. M.: quot;Statut quot;, 2004. 363 s.
Markova O.A. Sootnoshenie dogovornoy i deliktnoy otvetstvennosti v sfere zashchity prav potrebiteley // Pravo i ekonomika. 2010. №9. S.43.
Markova O.A. Sootnoshenie dogovornoy i deliktnoy otvetstvennosti v sfere zashchity prav potrebiteley // Pravo i ekonomika. 2010. №9. S.40-41.
Matveev YU.G. Anglo-amerikanskoe deliktnoe pravo. M.: YUridicheskaya literatura, 1973. S.26-31; Miller C.J., Lovell P.A. Product Liability. London: Butterworths, 1977. R. 5-7 i dr.
Matveev YU.G. Anglo-amerikanskoe deliktnoe pravo. M.: YUridicheskaya literatura, 1973. S.26.
Mnatsakanyan A.S. Grazhdansko-pravovaya otvetstvennost ispolnitelya meditsinskikh uslug. Avtoref. diss. k.yu.n., Krasnodar, 2008. S.7; Lorents D.V. Sistema grazhdansko-pravovykh prityazaniy i problema ikh konkurentsii // Grazhdanskoe pravo. 2008. №4. S.10 i dr.
Regulirovanie khozyaystvennoy deyatel nosti v torgovle / Pod red. YA.A. Kunik. M.: Ekonomika, 1984. S.116-125; Kabalkin A.YU., Mozolin V.P. Okhrana prav grazhdan-potrebiteley // Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. 1983. №4. S.43.
Rovnyy V.V. Problema konkurentsii iskov v sovremennom grazhdanskom prave // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2003. №3. S. 96-97.
Ruzanova E.V. K voprosu o sootnoshenii deliktnoy i dogovornoy otvetstvennosti // YUrist. 2006. №8. S.48.
Belyakova A.M. Grazhdansko-pravovaya otvetstvennost za prichinenie vreda. M.: Izdatel stvo Moskovskogo universiteta, 1986; Markova O.A. Sootnoshenie dogovornoy i deliktnoy otvetstvennosti v sfere zashchity prav potrebiteley // Pravo i ekonomika. 2010. №9. S.39 i dr.
Genkin D. M. Pravo sobstvennosti v SSSR. M.: Gosyurizdat, 1961. S.197.
Grazhdanskoe pravo: Uchebnik (chast 1) / Otv. red. V.P. Mozolin, A.I. Maslyaev. M.: quot;YUrist quot;, 2005. (avtor glavy N.M. Frolova).
Degtyarev S.L. Vozmeshchenie ubytkov v grazhdanskom i arbitrazhnom protsesse. 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. M.: Volters Kluver, 2003; Matveev YU.G. Ukaz. soch. S.26-27.
Ershov V.A., Sutyagin A.V., Kayl A.N. Postateynyy kommentariy k Grazhdanskomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii // SPS Konsul tant Plyus: Kommentarii zakonodatel stva, 2009.
Ershov O.G. Problemy vozmeshcheniya vreda, prichinennogo vsledstvie nedostatkov raboty pri dolevom stroitel stve zhil ya // Pravo i politika. 2008. №10. S.2478-2482.
Ioffe O.S. Obyazatel stvennoe pravo. M.: YUridicheskaya literatura, 1975. S.865.
Komarov A.S. Otvetstvennost v kommercheskom oborote. M.: YUridicheskaya literatura, 1991. S.159.
Kommentariy k Grazhdanskomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii, chasti vtoroy (postateynyy). 5-e izd., ispr. i dop. / Pod red. O.N. Sadikova. M.: quot;KONTRAKT quot;, quot;INFRA-M quot;, 2006.
Kulagin M.I. Izbrannye trudy po aktsionernomu i torgovomu pravu. 2-e izd., ispr. // Predprinimatel stvo i pravo: opyt zapada. M.: quot;Statut quot;, 2004. 363 s.
Markova O.A. Sootnoshenie dogovornoy i deliktnoy otvetstvennosti v sfere zashchity prav potrebiteley // Pravo i ekonomika. 2010. №9. S.43.
Markova O.A. Sootnoshenie dogovornoy i deliktnoy otvetstvennosti v sfere zashchity prav potrebiteley // Pravo i ekonomika. 2010. №9. S.40-41.
Matveev YU.G. Anglo-amerikanskoe deliktnoe pravo. M.: YUridicheskaya literatura, 1973. S.26-31; Miller C.J., Lovell P.A. Product Liability. London: Butterworths, 1977. R. 5-7 i dr.
Matveev YU.G. Anglo-amerikanskoe deliktnoe pravo. M.: YUridicheskaya literatura, 1973. S.26.
Mnatsakanyan A.S. Grazhdansko-pravovaya otvetstvennost ispolnitelya meditsinskikh uslug. Avtoref. diss. k.yu.n., Krasnodar, 2008. S.7; Lorents D.V. Sistema grazhdansko-pravovykh prityazaniy i problema ikh konkurentsii // Grazhdanskoe pravo. 2008. №4. S.10 i dr.
Regulirovanie khozyaystvennoy deyatel nosti v torgovle / Pod red. YA.A. Kunik. M.: Ekonomika, 1984. S.116-125; Kabalkin A.YU., Mozolin V.P. Okhrana prav grazhdan-potrebiteley // Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. 1983. №4. S.43.
Rovnyy V.V. Problema konkurentsii iskov v sovremennom grazhdanskom prave // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2003. №3. S. 96-97.
Ruzanova E.V. K voprosu o sootnoshenii deliktnoy i dogovornoy otvetstvennosti // YUrist. 2006. №8. S.48.
Keywords:
Civil law, contractual liability, products, the defects of the goods.
