Jurisdiction of the courts of arbitration disputes whether to appeal against the prosecutor warnings?
( Pp. 110-112)

In the article the problem associated with the review of applications for contesting the warnings as an act of prosecutorial response arbitration courts, also reflects the position of arbitration courts jurisdiction on cases involving challenging warnings prosecutor

Bezsaliy O.R., (2014), JURISDICTION OF THE COURTS OF ARBITRATION DISPUTES WHETHER TO APPEAL AGAINST THE PROSECUTOR WARNINGS?. Business in Law, 3 => 110-112.

Federal nyy zakon ot 17.01.1992 № 2202-1 O prokurature Rossiyskoy Federatsii (v redaktsii ot 02.04.2014)// SPS Konsul tantPlyus .
Ukazanie General nogo prokurora Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 6 iyulya 1999 g. № 39/7 O primenenii predosterezheniya o nedopustimosti narusheniya zakona //Prokurorskiy nadzor: sbornik prikazov, ukazaniy, instruktsiy General nogo prokurora RF. Ekaterinburg: ID UrGYUA.S.189-191.
Postanovlenie FAS Dal nevostochnogo okruga №F03-A51/ 07-1/1813 ot 29.05.2013//SPS Konsul tantPlyus .
Postanovlenie FAS Ural skogo okruga №09-3606/ 04-GK ot 28.10.2004 // SPS Konsul tantPlyus .
Postanovlenie Semnadtsatogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda № 17AP-2046/2014-AK ot 27.03.2014 // SPS Konsul tantPlyus .
Bezsaliy O. R. Sub ekty predosterezheniya o nedopustimosti narusheniy zakona // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve №3, 2013, s. 141-143.

the warning about the inadmissibility of violation of the law, official, the court of arbitration, jurisdiction, the Prosecutor, the act of Prosecutor's reaction, judicial practice.