CONFLICT REGULATION OF THE SECURITY REAL RIGHTS
( Pp. 24-30)

More about authors
Martynets Pavel Vladimirovich aspirant kafedry mezhdunarodnogo chastnogo prava
Moscow State University of Law by the name of O. E. Kutafin (MSLA)
For read the full article, please, register or log in
Abstract:
In this article are analyzed questions of conflict regulation of the security real rights in the relation of a personal estate, a problem of the foreign limited real rights action for Russia territories. The purpose is to cover problems of functioning of the adaptation mechanism of the foreign security real right for application in the Russia territory in accordance to Russian law. The sources of research were the publications of Russian and foreign scientists in limited real rights, a law of conflict, comparative jurisprudence. There is investigated foreign experience of regulation of the real rights adaptation (in particular, experience of Germany, the USA, Canada) and also UNCITRAL materials. Results: It is proved the solving a problem by regulation of recognition and definition of the content of the foreign security right for movable property when moving property on the Russian Federation territory. Conclusions: The research results and original problem judgment are allowed to establish the following: Application of a conflict binding of lex rei sitae in a context of creation and implementation of providing obligations is connected to certain difficulties in case of movement of the burdened personal estate abroad. The specified difficulties first of all are connected with need of recognition of providing abroad action. Situations when the "imported" security right won't admit the new location of a thing are as a result probable. The another problems are connected with definition of the legal nature of the security right, definition of its contents and its implementation. There is a need of its adaptation to new legal system in case of recognition of the security right abroad. There is made the conclusion about the need of the comparative and legal analysis of the "imported" right. The key purpose of this search is finding of the closest equivalent by the nature, form and economic target in accepting actual legal system.
How to Cite:
Martynets P.V., (2014), CONFLICT REGULATION OF THE SECURITY REAL RIGHTS. Business in Law, 3: 24-30.
Reference list:
Agarkov M.M. Obyazatel stvo po sovetskomu grazhdanskomu pravu. // Izbrannye trudy po grazhdanskomu pravu. V 2 t. T.1. M., 2002.
Asoskov A.V. Kollizionnoe regulirovanie dogovornykh obyazatel stv // SPS Konsul tant Plyus.
Biryukova L.A. Fidutsiarnaya sobstvennost kak obespecheniya zashchity kreditora // Aktual nye problemy grazhdanskogo prava Pod red. S.S. Alekseeva. M., 2000.
Gongalo B.M. Uchenie ob obespechenii obyazatel stv. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. M., 2004.
Grazhdanskoe ulozhenie Germanii, Vvodnyy zakon k Grazhdanskomu ulozheniyu. 3-e izd. Per. s nem. M., 2008.
Zykin I.S. K voprosu o sootnoshenii veshchnogo i obyazatel stvennogo statutov. Grazhdanskoe pravo sovremennoy Rossii M., 2008.
Kommentariy k Grazhdanskomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii, chasti tret ey (postateynyy) (Vinogradova R. I., Dmitrieva G. K., Repin V. S.) / pod redaktsiey V. P. Mozolina // SPS Konsul tant Plyus.
Interv yu Predsedatelya Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo Suda RF professora A.A. Ivanova zhurnalu Zakon // Zakon. 2006. №12.
Lunts L.A. Kurs Mezhdunarodnogo chastnogo prava. Osobennaya chast . M., 2002.
Magnus, Kokh, Vinkler Fon Morenfel s Mezhdunarodnoe chastnoe pravo. Per. s nem. d-ra yur. nauk YU.M. YUmasheva. M., 2003.
Mayer A. Veshchnye prava v nemetskom mezhdunarodnom chastnom prave. K voprosu o priznanii i transformatsii po nemetskomu pravu inostrannykh sposobov obespecheniya ispolneniya obyazatel stv, otnosyashchikhsya k dvizhimomu imushchestvu. // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2007. №1.
Pokrovskiy I.A. Osnovnye problemy grazhdanskogo prava. M., 1998.
Pravo sobstvennosti: aktual nye problemy (otv. red. V.N. Litovkin, E.A. Sukhanov, V.V. CHubarov)// SPS Konsul tant Plyus.
Rukovodstvo YUNSITRAL dlya zakonodatel nykh organov po obespechitel nym sdelkam. Organizatsiya Ob edinennykh Natsiy, N yu-York 2010.
Sarbash S.V. Obespechitel naya peredacha pravovogo titula. // Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava. 2008. №1.
Sukhanov E.ARossiyskoe grazhdanskoe pravo. Uchebnik v 2 tomakh. T.1. M.2011.
Blue Sky One Limited O rs v. Mahan Air Ano r 2010 EWHC 631 (Comm)
Derrupe J. Droit international prive. Paris, 1990.
Lewald H, Regles generales des conflits de lois - Contribution a la technique du droit international prive. // Recueil des Cours. 1939. Vol. 69, № 3.
Mauri G., Van Itterbeek B. The Cape Town Convention on international interests in mobile equipment and its protocol on matters specific to aircraft equipment: a Belgian perspective // Uniform Law Review. 2004. NS 9,
North and Fawcett, Cheshire and North s Private International Law. 11th ed. London 1987.
Rabel, The Conflict of Laws: A Comparative Study, Chicago 1958.
Shilling. Some European Decisions on Non-possessory Security Rights in Private International Law. // International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 1985. Vol. 34.
United Nations Commission on International Trade Law Yearbook. 1977. Vol. VIII.
Keywords:
the enforcement of obligations, the limited real right, conflict regulation, Deposit, movable property, lex rei sitae, adaptation.