On the intersectoral regulation of circumstances to be proved at the stage of sentence execution
( Pp. 203-206)
More about authors
Krymov Alexander Alexandrovich
kand. yurid. nauk, docent, general-mayor vnutrenney sluzhby. Dolzhnost: nachalnik.
Academy of the FPS of Russia
Academy of the FPS of Russia
Abstract:
In the article the author gives an opinion that it is possible to identify the specific groups of circumstances depending on the issues belonging to the same category. In his opinion, reflection of circumstances, which are to be proved, in the documents sending to the court is an obligation of administration of the penal establishment or body. The article presents the legislative sources, which contain links to the documents sending to the court, as well as various circumstances which are to be proved. Particular attention is paid to acts of amnesty (pardon) and circumstances which are to be proved by deciding on the application of amnesty (pardon) in relation to a certain prisoner. In the article the author makes the conclusion that it is necessary to regulate more accurately at the legislative level the circumstances which are to be proved by deciding different issues on the stage of execution of a sentence
How to Cite:
Krymov A.A., (2014), ON THE INTERSECTORAL REGULATION OF CIRCUMSTANCES TO BE PROVED AT THE STAGE OF SENTENCE EXECUTION. Business in Law, 2: 203-206.
Reference list:
Babayan S. L. Sovershenstvovanie pooshchritel nykh institutov ugolovno-ispolnitel nogo prava - vazhnaya zadacha reformirovaniya ugolovno-ispolnitel noy sistemy Rossii // vstup. slovo YU. I. Kalinina; pod nauch. red. V. I. Seliverstova i V. A. Utkina. - M. : YUrisprudentsiya, 2014. - S. 46-47.
Dobrovol skaya T. N. Deyatel nost suda, svyazannaya s ispolneniem prigovorov. - M., 1979. - 140 s.
Kashuba YU. A. O yuridicheskoy prirode i soderzhanii pomilovaniya kak institute prava // Ukaz Prezidenta RF ot 28 dekabrya 2001 goda № 1500 O komissiyakh po voprosam pomilovaniya na territoriyakh sub ektov RF (teoreticheskiy i prakticheskiy aspekty) : materialy Vseros. nauch.-prakt. konf. - M. ; Bryansk, 2002. - S. 67-68.
Seliverstov V. I. Sushchnost i soderzhanie amnistii: problemnye voprosy // CHelovek: prestuplenie i nakazanie. - 2009. - № 4. - S. 37-40.
Skiba A. P. Problemy otsenki chlenovreditel stva osuzhdennogo k lisheniyu svobody pri ego dosrochnom osvobozhdenii ot otbyvaniya nakazaniya // Ugolovnoe pravo. - 2010. - № 5. - S. 123-129.
YUsupova I. F. Dokazyvanie v stadii ispolneniya prigovora (diskussionnye voprosy) // Vestn. Udmurt. un-ta. - 2011. - № 2-3. - S. 175-177.
Dobrovol skaya T. N. Deyatel nost suda, svyazannaya s ispolneniem prigovorov. - M., 1979. - 140 s.
Kashuba YU. A. O yuridicheskoy prirode i soderzhanii pomilovaniya kak institute prava // Ukaz Prezidenta RF ot 28 dekabrya 2001 goda № 1500 O komissiyakh po voprosam pomilovaniya na territoriyakh sub ektov RF (teoreticheskiy i prakticheskiy aspekty) : materialy Vseros. nauch.-prakt. konf. - M. ; Bryansk, 2002. - S. 67-68.
Seliverstov V. I. Sushchnost i soderzhanie amnistii: problemnye voprosy // CHelovek: prestuplenie i nakazanie. - 2009. - № 4. - S. 37-40.
Skiba A. P. Problemy otsenki chlenovreditel stva osuzhdennogo k lisheniyu svobody pri ego dosrochnom osvobozhdenii ot otbyvaniya nakazaniya // Ugolovnoe pravo. - 2010. - № 5. - S. 123-129.
YUsupova I. F. Dokazyvanie v stadii ispolneniya prigovora (diskussionnye voprosy) // Vestn. Udmurt. un-ta. - 2011. - № 2-3. - S. 175-177.
Keywords:
the sentence, proof, cross-sectoral regulation, the circumstances to be proven.
