SENTENCE, ACTIONS BASED ON THE VERDICT OF THE JURORS, AS THE SUBJECT OF THE APPEAL AND CHECK APPEAL
( Pp. 118-122)

Purpose: the Purpose of this article is the author's desire to show the shortcomings of the current criminal procedural legislation of the Russian Federation regarding the distribution on the sentences of the court acting with the participation of jurors, the appellate procedure of appeal and verification, and to determine the most optimal model appeal such sentences. Area of study/methodology: the article analyzes the norms of current criminal procedural legislation of the Russian Federation regulating the procedure of appeal and review of sentence, pronounced on the basis of the verdict of a jury, practice the implementation of these norms. When writing the article used the dialectical, logical, systematic, formal-legal methods. Conclusions: the Author concludes that the fact of regulation in the current code of criminal procedure the right of appeal and review of sentence, pronounced on the basis of the verdict of a jury, contradicts the essence of the institution of appeal. Examining the literature point of view, the author considers it inappropriate expansion of powers of court of appeal, in part to enable him to verify the validity of the sentence imposed by the court with participation of jurors and of allocating the right to decide a new verdict based on the verdict of a jury. It is proposed to sentence, actions based on the verdict of the jurors, provide exclusively the cassation procedure from the point of view of formal substantive violations of criminal law and criminal procedural law. Novelty/originality/value: article has a certain scientific value and practical significance, because it contains insights and suggestions that can be useful in reforming the criminal procedure legislation of the Russian Federation and in the current appellate practice.

Sukhova O.A., (2017), SENTENCE, ACTIONS BASED ON THE VERDICT OF THE JURORS, AS THE SUBJECT OF THE APPEAL AND CHECK APPEAL. Sociopolitical Sciences, 4 => 118-122.

Ugolovno-protsessual nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 18 dekabrya 2001 g. № 174-FZ Elektronnyy resurs : (s izm. i dop., v red. ot 1 iyulya 2017 g.). Dostup iz sprav. - pravovoy sistemy Konsul tantPlyus .
O vnesenii izmeneniy v Ugolovno-protsessual nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii i priznanii utrativshimi silu otdel nykh zakonodatel nykh aktov (polozheniy zakonodatel nykh aktov) Rossiyskoy Federatsii Elektronnyy resurs : Feder. zakon ot 29 dek. 2010 g. № 433-FZ // Ros. gaz. 2010. 31 dek.
Ob otkaze v prinyatii k rassmotreniyu zhaloby grazhdanina Miroshnichenko V.I. na narushenie konstitutsionnykh prav chast yu vtoroy stat i 379 Ugolovno-protsessual nogo kodeksa RF Elektronnyy resurs : Opredelenie Konstituts. Suda RF ot 2 iyulya 2013 g. № 1052-O. Dostup iz sprav. - pravovoy sistemy Konsul tantPlyus .
Ob otkaze v prinyatii k rassmotreniyu zhaloby grazhdanina Markova Vasiliya Aleksandrovicha na narushenie ego konstitutsionnykh prav chast yu pyatoy stat i 348 i stat ey 379 Ugolovno-protsessual nogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii Elektronnyy resurs : Opredelenie Konstituts. Suda RF ot 24 dek. 2013 g. № 2003-O. Dostup iz sprav. - pravovoy sistemy Konsul tantPlyus .
O primenenii norm Ugolovno-protsessual nogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii, reguliruyushchikh proizvodstvo v sude apellyatsionnoy instantsii Elektronnyy resurs : Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhov. Suda RF ot 27 noyab. 2012 g. № 26 (v red. ot 1 dek. 2015 g.). Dostup iz sprav. - pravovoy sistemy Konsul tantPlyus .
O primenenii norm glavy 47.1 Ugolovno-protsessual nogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii, reguliruyushchikh proizvodstvo v sude kassatsionnoy instantsii Elektronnyy resurs : Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhov. Suda RF ot 28 yanv. 2014 g. № 2 // Ros. gaz. 2014. 07 fevr.
Ustav ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva ot 20 noyabrya 1964 g. // Rossiyskoe zakonodatel stvo X - XX vekov. V 9-ti tomakh. T. 8. / pod obshch. red. O. I. CHistyakova. M.: YUrid. lit., 1991. S.120-251.
Kontseptsiya sudebnoy reformy v Rossiyskoy Federatsii / sost. S. A. Pashin. M: Respublika,1992. 111 s.
Belkin A. R. Apellyatsiya: nekotorye strannosti // Ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo. 2014. № 2. S. 24 - 25.
Bobrakova I. S. Apellyatsiya v ugolovnom protsesse: osoznannaya neobkhodimost ili vzleleyannyy mif / I. S. Bobrakova, N. N. Kovtun // Voprosy pravovedeniya. M.: Mezhdunar. issled. in-t, 2012. № 2. S. 178-191.
Butskovskiy N. A. Ocherk kassatsionnogo poryadka otmeny resheniy po Sudebnym ustavam 1864 g. SPb.: Tipografiya Vtorogo Otdeleniya Sobstvennoy E.I.V. Kantselyarii, 1866. 187 s.
Vladykina T. Obyazatel nost verdikta kollegii prisyazhnykh zasedateley // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2012. № 4. S. 78 - 84.
Potapov V. D. Osnovnye nachala proverki sudebnykh resheniy v kontrol no-proverochnykh stadiyakh i proizvodstvakh ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva Rossii: avtoref. dis.. doktora yuridicheskikh nauk. M., 2013. 67 s.
Tarasov A. A. Ob apellyatsionnom peresmotre resheniya suda prisyazhnykh // Ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo. 2011. № 3. S. 18-20.
Tarasov A. A. Sud prisyazhnykh i problemy narodnogo uchastiya v pravosudii: monografiya / A. A. Tarasov, O. R. Rakhmetullina. M. : Izd-vo Rusayns , 2016. - 218 s.
Trukhin S. A. Apellyatsionnyy peresmotr prigovora, protivorechashchego verdiktu prisyazhnykh // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2015. № 6. S. 35-38.
Trukhin S. A. Proverka v apellyatsii faktov, ustanavlivaemykh predsedatel stvuyushchim posle provozglasheniya verdikta prisyazhnykh // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2015. № 4. S. 113-119.
KHokhryakov M. A. Predely sudebnogo razbiratel stva ugolovnykh del v sude pervoy instantsii: zakonodatel stvo, teoriya, praktika: dis.. kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2013. 233 s.
SHarapova D. V. Osnovaniya apellyatsionnogo obzhalovaniya prigovora, postanovlennogo sudom s uchastiem prisyazhnykh zasedateley // Aktual nye problemy rossiyskogo prava. 2014. № 10. S. 2316 - 2319.

criminal proceedings, appeal and review of sentence, appeal, cassation, the jury, the verdict, the sentence, review.