Civil society is the key to explaining different points of view on the history of Russia
( Pp. 122-125)
More about authors
Lichman Boris V.
doktor istoricheskih nauk, professor, zav. kafedroy istoricheskih disciplin Uralskogo instituta ekonomiki, upravleniya i prava, Zasluzhennyy rabotnik Vysshey shkoly RF, chlen Nauchno-metodicheskogo soveta po istorii ministerstva obrazovaniya i nauki RF, prorektor Uralskogo instituta ekonomiki, upravleniya i prava, professor kafedry teorii i istorii mezhdunarodnyh otnosheniy departamenta mezhdunarodnyh otnosheniy Uralskogo gumanitarnogo instituta Uralskogo federalnogo universiteta im. B.N. Elcina
Ural Federal University named after B.N. Yeltsin
Ural Federal University named after B.N. Yeltsin
Abstract:
Civil society and the state. The key to explaining history (historical fact in historical time and historical space) is the worldview logic of history or historical processes. There are several historical processes. These are historical processes: religious, local and global (Marxist, liberal). Civil society and the state do not equally treat the explanation of history. In civil society, history is explained from the standpoint of several historical processes. State history is explained from the standpoint of only one historical process.
How to Cite:
Lichman B.V., (2017), CIVIL SOCIETY IS THE KEY TO EXPLAINING DIFFERENT POINTS OF VIEW ON THE HISTORY OF RUSSIA. Sociopolitical Sciences, 3 => 122-125.
Reference list:
Sm.: Rudenkin V. N., Rudenkin D. V. Evolyutsiya politicheskoy kul tury Rossii v nachale KHKH1 veka: sootnoshenie traditsiy i novatsiy: monografiya /V. N. Rudenkin, D. V. Rudenkin; Ural skiy in-t ekonomiki, upravleniya i prava, Nizhnetagil skiy fil., Nizhniy Tagil, 2010.
Sm.: Zapariy V. V., Kamynin V. D. Metodologicheskaya revolyutsiya v istorii, ili sovremennye issledovateli o sootnoshenii istorii i politiki. // Vestnik YUzhno - Ural skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, seriya: Sotsial no - gumanitarnye nauki. 2016, №3; Kamynin V. D. Teoreticheskoe osmyslenie problem razvitiya sovremennogo istoricheskogo znaniya.// Izvestiya Ural skogo Federal nogo universiteta. Seriya 3. Obshchestvennye nauki.-2016- №1 (149).
Sm.: Istoriya Rossii. Teorii izucheniya. Uchebnoe posobie./Pod red. prof. B. V. Lichmana. Ekaterinburg. Izd-vo SV-96 ,2001; Lichman B. V. Novoe otnoshenie k ob yasneniyu istorii Rossii.//Vestnik Ural skogo instituta ekonomiki, upravleniya i prava.2016.№4.; Lichman B. V. Sub ektivnoe ob yasnenie istorii Rossii. Mnogo kontseptual nost i tolerantnost . //Sotsial no - politicheskie nauki. 2017.№1.
Sm.: Tyupa V. I. Komparativizm kak nauchnaya strategiya gumanitarnogo poznaniya. //Filologicheskie nauki. - 2004.-№6.;
Sm.: Mark Ferro: Kak rasskazyvayut istoriyu detyam v raznykh stranakh mira.: Per. s fr. M., 1992.
Istoriya Rossii. Mirovozzrencheskie vzglyady, tochki zreniya na smysl, khod i fakty istorii: ucheb. posobie. Izd. SV-96 . Ekaterinburg.-2004.;
Kamynin V. D. Teoreticheskoe osmyslenie problem razvitiya sovremennogo istoricheskogo znaniya.// Izvestiya Ural skogo Federal nogo universiteta. Seriya 3. Obshchestvennye nauki.-2016- №1 (149).;
Lichman B. V. Tolerantnost ideologicheskogo mnogoobraziya v gosudarstvennom uchebnike po istorii Rossii. //Prepodavanie istorii v shkole.-2014-№4.
Sm.: Zapariy V. V., Kamynin V. D. Metodologicheskaya revolyutsiya v istorii, ili sovremennye issledovateli o sootnoshenii istorii i politiki. // Vestnik YUzhno - Ural skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, seriya: Sotsial no - gumanitarnye nauki. 2016, №3; Kamynin V. D. Teoreticheskoe osmyslenie problem razvitiya sovremennogo istoricheskogo znaniya.// Izvestiya Ural skogo Federal nogo universiteta. Seriya 3. Obshchestvennye nauki.-2016- №1 (149).
Sm.: Istoriya Rossii. Teorii izucheniya. Uchebnoe posobie./Pod red. prof. B. V. Lichmana. Ekaterinburg. Izd-vo SV-96 ,2001; Lichman B. V. Novoe otnoshenie k ob yasneniyu istorii Rossii.//Vestnik Ural skogo instituta ekonomiki, upravleniya i prava.2016.№4.; Lichman B. V. Sub ektivnoe ob yasnenie istorii Rossii. Mnogo kontseptual nost i tolerantnost . //Sotsial no - politicheskie nauki. 2017.№1.
Sm.: Tyupa V. I. Komparativizm kak nauchnaya strategiya gumanitarnogo poznaniya. //Filologicheskie nauki. - 2004.-№6.;
Sm.: Mark Ferro: Kak rasskazyvayut istoriyu detyam v raznykh stranakh mira.: Per. s fr. M., 1992.
Istoriya Rossii. Mirovozzrencheskie vzglyady, tochki zreniya na smysl, khod i fakty istorii: ucheb. posobie. Izd. SV-96 . Ekaterinburg.-2004.;
Kamynin V. D. Teoreticheskoe osmyslenie problem razvitiya sovremennogo istoricheskogo znaniya.// Izvestiya Ural skogo Federal nogo universiteta. Seriya 3. Obshchestvennye nauki.-2016- №1 (149).;
Lichman B. V. Tolerantnost ideologicheskogo mnogoobraziya v gosudarstvennom uchebnike po istorii Rossii. //Prepodavanie istorii v shkole.-2014-№4.
