Driving forces in global education policy scenarios
( Pp. 15-22)

Introduction. The issues of formation of modern ideas about the actor structure and driving forces of influence in the global educational policy framework are considered. Topic. The understanding of global educational policy is formed in several contexts: as a function of the state; as the activity of non-governmental organizations; as a compromise between multidirectional groups representing the interests of different countries and others. Methods. The application of the multipolarity methodology as the main position for global educational policy is justified. Results. The significance of globalization for the education development is clarified, and its main drivers (political, economic, cultural, technological, and financial) are highlighted. It is shown that establishing the structure of actors is not enough to form a holistic view of global educational policy without specifying in a single methodological structure the reasons for changes in the type and composition of actors and the value of innovations in the future educational agenda. The authors highlight the driving forces that influence global educational policy: scientific and technological progress, transformation of the world economic system, and development of communications; dynamism of foreign policy strategies, which makes it possible to implement the concept of“competition through cooperation”. It is proved that the set of possible actions of actors is realized through a sequence of scenarios (economic, institutional, and social scenarios) that lead to the formation of a globalizing scenario as an integral one. Discussion. The presented proposals to clarify the actor approach allow us to get away from the declarative nature and subjectivity of the justification of actors, combining the assessment of possible actions, policies and scenarios to obtain a methodologically significant identification of actors within the available set of knowledge in the chosen field-education.

Antyukhova E.A., (2020), DRIVING FORCES IN GLOBAL EDUCATION POLICY SCENARIOS. Sociopolitical Sciences, 2 => 15-22. DOI: 10.33693/2223-0092-2020-10-2-15-22

Verger A., Novelli M., Altinyelken H.K. Global education policy and international development: A revisited introduction. In: Verger A., Novelli M. and Altinyelken H.K. (eds.). Global education policy and international development: New agendas, issues and policies (2nd ed.). London: Bloomsbury, 2018. Rr. 1-34.
Sassen S. Globalization and its discontents. New York: The New Press, 1998. 253 p.
Mundy K. Globalization and educational change: New policy worlds. In: Bascia N., Cumming A., Datnow A., Leithwood K., Livingstone D. (eds.) International handbook of educational policy. Springer International Handbooks of Education. Vol. 13. Springer, Dordrecht, 2005. 1116 p.
Dale R. Globalisation and education: Demonstrating a common world educational culture or locating a globally structured educational agenda Educational Theory. 2000. No. 50 (4). Pp. 427-448.
Hirst P., Thompson G. Globalisation in question. The international economy and the possibilities of governance. Cambridge, Polity Press, 1996. 631 p.
Haass R. The age of non-polarity: What will follow US Dominance Foreign Affairs. 2008. No. 87 (3). P. 44-56.
Meyer J.W. The world polity and the authority of the nation-state. A. Bergesen (ed.); Studies of the Modern World-System. New York: Academic Press, 1980. Rr. 109-137.
Meyer J., Boli J., Thomas G., Ramirez F. World society and the nation-state. American Journal of Sociology. 1997. No. 103 (1). Pr. 144-181.
Dugin A.G. Teoriya mnogopolyarnogo mira. Plyuriversum. M.: Akademicheskiy proekt, 2015. 532 c.
Rosencrance R. Action and reaction in world politics: International systems in perspective. Praeger, 1963. 314 p.
Ball S.J. Global education Inc: New policy networks and the neo-liberal imaginary. New York: Routledge, 2012. 184 p.
Levi Faur D. Varieties of regulatory capitalism: Getting the most persistence of national variation. Governance. 2006. No. 19 (3). Pr. 367-382.
Dale R., Robertson S. Beyond methodological isms in comparative education in an era of globalisation. In: Handbook on comparative education. F. Kazamias, R. Cowan (eds.). Netherlands: Springer, 2007. Pr. 19-32.
Makazhanova ZH.M. Polikul turnost v sovremennom obrazovanii, ili chem otlichaetsya polikul turnost ot mul tikul turalizma // Nepreryvnoe obrazovanie: XXI vek. 2018. № 3 (23). C. 106-113.
CHuchin-Rusov A.E. Kul turnyy plyuralizm // Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost . 1995. № 4. URL: http://ecsocman. hse.ru/data/489/736/1216/019 Chuchin-Rusov KULTURA.pdf.
Palatkina G.V. Mul ti-kul turnoe obrazovanie v polietnicheskom prostranstve. Astrakhan : Izd-vo Astrakhanskogo gos. ped. un-ta, 2001. 196 c.
Bayer YU.P. Aktornyy podkhod k issledovaniyu global noy obrazovatel noy politiki // Upravlencheskoe konsul tirovanie. 2019. № 3. S. 72-78. DOI: 10.22394/1726-1139- 2019-3-72-78.
TSygankov P.A. Aktory i faktory v mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniyakh i mirovoy politike / Privatizatsiya mirovoy politiki: lokal nye deystviya - global nye rezul taty / pod red. M.M. Lebedevoy. M.: ZAO Goldon-Bi, 2013. C. 30-53.
Lebedeva M.M. Mirovaya politika. M.: Aspekt Press, 2016. 351 c.
Kalyuzhnaya D.E. Sovremennye aktory mirovoy politiki i perekhod k ustoychivomu razvitiyu // Sotsiodinamika. 2013. № 5. S. 45-87. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0158.2013.5.664.
Risse Th. Transnational actors and world politics / Handbook of international relations / Ed. by W. Carsnaes, Th. Risse, B.A. Simmons. London: Sage, 2002. Pr. 251-286.
Fumasoli T., Stensaker V., Vukasovic M. Tackling the multi-actor and multi-level complexity of European governance of knowledge: Transnational actors in focus. European Educational Research Journal. 2018. Vol. 17. No. 3. Pr. 325-334. DOI: 10.1177/1474904117742763.
Bek U. ZHizn v obshchestve global nogo riska - kak s etim spravit sya: kosmopoliticheskiy povorot: lektsiya / per. V. Malakhova. URL: https://www.gorby.ru/userfiles/lekciya ulrih beka.pdf
Piirainen T. Towards a new social order in Russia: Transforming structures in everyday life. University of Helsinki, 1997. 254 p.
Rostou U. Stadii ekonomicheskogo rosta. N yu-York: Izd- vo Frederika A Preger, 1961. 242 s.
Gabrielyan A.M. Mirovye trendy i vyzovy sisteme vysshego obrazovaniya: matritsa effektivnoy politiki reform universiteta // Mirovaya politika. 2017. № 1. S. 37-46. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8671.2017.1.22049.
Izmaylova M.A. Sovremennoe rossiyskoe obrazovanie cherez prizmu global noy obrazovatel noy politiki // Gumanitarnye nauki. Vestnik Finansovogo universiteta. 2018. № 8 (4). S. 36-43. DOI: 10.26794/2226-7867-2018-8-4-36-43.
Global education futures. Educational ecosystems for societal transformation. 26.04.2018. URL: http://www.globaledufutures.org/images/people/GEF april26-min.pdf

globalization, education, global educational policy, driving forces of development, scenarios, actors of global educational policy.