Driving forces in global education policy scenarios
( Pp. 15-22)
More about authors
Antyukhova Ekaterina A.
kandidat politicheskih nauk; starshiy prepodavatel kafedry sravnitelnoy politologii
Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University)
Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University)
Abstract:
Introduction. The issues of formation of modern ideas about the actor structure and driving forces of influence in the global educational policy framework are considered. Topic. The understanding of global educational policy is formed in several contexts: as a function of the state; as the activity of non-governmental organizations; as a compromise between multidirectional groups representing the interests of different countries and others. Methods. The application of the multipolarity methodology as the main position for global educational policy is justified. Results. The significance of globalization for the education development is clarified, and its main drivers (political, economic, cultural, technological, and financial) are highlighted. It is shown that establishing the structure of actors is not enough to form a holistic view of global educational policy without specifying in a single methodological structure the reasons for changes in the type and composition of actors and the value of innovations in the future educational agenda. The authors highlight the driving forces that influence global educational policy: scientific and technological progress, transformation of the world economic system, and development of communications; dynamism of foreign policy strategies, which makes it possible to implement the concept of“competition through cooperation”. It is proved that the set of possible actions of actors is realized through a sequence of scenarios (economic, institutional, and social scenarios) that lead to the formation of a globalizing scenario as an integral one. Discussion. The presented proposals to clarify the actor approach allow us to get away from the declarative nature and subjectivity of the justification of actors, combining the assessment of possible actions, policies and scenarios to obtain a methodologically significant identification of actors within the available set of knowledge in the chosen field-education.
How to Cite:
Antyukhova E.A., (2020), DRIVING FORCES IN GLOBAL EDUCATION POLICY SCENARIOS. Sociopolitical Sciences, 2 => 15-22.
Reference list:
Verger A., Novelli M., Altinyelken H.K. Global education policy and international development: A revisited introduction. In: Verger A., Novelli M. and Altinyelken H.K. (eds.). Global education policy and international development: New agendas, issues and policies (2nd ed.). London: Bloomsbury, 2018. Rr. 1-34.
Sassen S. Globalization and its discontents. New York: The New Press, 1998. 253 p.
Mundy K. Globalization and educational change: New policy worlds. In: Bascia N., Cumming A., Datnow A., Leithwood K., Livingstone D. (eds.) International handbook of educational policy. Springer International Handbooks of Education. Vol. 13. Springer, Dordrecht, 2005. 1116 p.
Dale R. Globalisation and education: Demonstrating a common world educational culture or locating a globally structured educational agenda Educational Theory. 2000. No. 50 (4). Pp. 427-448.
Hirst P., Thompson G. Globalisation in question. The international economy and the possibilities of governance. Cambridge, Polity Press, 1996. 631 p.
Haass R. The age of non-polarity: What will follow US Dominance Foreign Affairs. 2008. No. 87 (3). P. 44-56.
Meyer J.W. The world polity and the authority of the nation-state. A. Bergesen (ed.); Studies of the Modern World-System. New York: Academic Press, 1980. Rr. 109-137.
Meyer J., Boli J., Thomas G., Ramirez F. World society and the nation-state. American Journal of Sociology. 1997. No. 103 (1). Pr. 144-181.
Dugin A.G. Teoriya mnogopolyarnogo mira. Plyuriversum. M.: Akademicheskiy proekt, 2015. 532 c.
Rosencrance R. Action and reaction in world politics: International systems in perspective. Praeger, 1963. 314 p.
Ball S.J. Global education Inc: New policy networks and the neo-liberal imaginary. New York: Routledge, 2012. 184 p.
Levi Faur D. Varieties of regulatory capitalism: Getting the most persistence of national variation. Governance. 2006. No. 19 (3). Pr. 367-382.
Dale R., Robertson S. Beyond methodological isms in comparative education in an era of globalisation. In: Handbook on comparative education. F. Kazamias, R. Cowan (eds.). Netherlands: Springer, 2007. Pr. 19-32.
Makazhanova ZH.M. Polikul turnost v sovremennom obrazovanii, ili chem otlichaetsya polikul turnost ot mul tikul turalizma // Nepreryvnoe obrazovanie: XXI vek. 2018. № 3 (23). C. 106-113.
CHuchin-Rusov A.E. Kul turnyy plyuralizm // Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost . 1995. № 4. URL: http://ecsocman. hse.ru/data/489/736/1216/019 Chuchin-Rusov KULTURA.pdf.
Palatkina G.V. Mul ti-kul turnoe obrazovanie v polietnicheskom prostranstve. Astrakhan : Izd-vo Astrakhanskogo gos. ped. un-ta, 2001. 196 c.
Bayer YU.P. Aktornyy podkhod k issledovaniyu global noy obrazovatel noy politiki // Upravlencheskoe konsul tirovanie. 2019. № 3. S. 72-78. DOI: 10.22394/1726-1139- 2019-3-72-78.
TSygankov P.A. Aktory i faktory v mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniyakh i mirovoy politike / Privatizatsiya mirovoy politiki: lokal nye deystviya - global nye rezul taty / pod red. M.M. Lebedevoy. M.: ZAO Goldon-Bi, 2013. C. 30-53.
Lebedeva M.M. Mirovaya politika. M.: Aspekt Press, 2016. 351 c.
Kalyuzhnaya D.E. Sovremennye aktory mirovoy politiki i perekhod k ustoychivomu razvitiyu // Sotsiodinamika. 2013. № 5. S. 45-87. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0158.2013.5.664.
Risse Th. Transnational actors and world politics / Handbook of international relations / Ed. by W. Carsnaes, Th. Risse, B.A. Simmons. London: Sage, 2002. Pr. 251-286.
Fumasoli T., Stensaker V., Vukasovic M. Tackling the multi-actor and multi-level complexity of European governance of knowledge: Transnational actors in focus. European Educational Research Journal. 2018. Vol. 17. No. 3. Pr. 325-334. DOI: 10.1177/1474904117742763.
Bek U. ZHizn v obshchestve global nogo riska - kak s etim spravit sya: kosmopoliticheskiy povorot: lektsiya / per. V. Malakhova. URL: https://www.gorby.ru/userfiles/lekciya ulrih beka.pdf
Piirainen T. Towards a new social order in Russia: Transforming structures in everyday life. University of Helsinki, 1997. 254 p.
Rostou U. Stadii ekonomicheskogo rosta. N yu-York: Izd- vo Frederika A Preger, 1961. 242 s.
Gabrielyan A.M. Mirovye trendy i vyzovy sisteme vysshego obrazovaniya: matritsa effektivnoy politiki reform universiteta // Mirovaya politika. 2017. № 1. S. 37-46. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8671.2017.1.22049.
Izmaylova M.A. Sovremennoe rossiyskoe obrazovanie cherez prizmu global noy obrazovatel noy politiki // Gumanitarnye nauki. Vestnik Finansovogo universiteta. 2018. № 8 (4). S. 36-43. DOI: 10.26794/2226-7867-2018-8-4-36-43.
Global education futures. Educational ecosystems for societal transformation. 26.04.2018. URL: http://www.globaledufutures.org/images/people/GEF april26-min.pdf
Sassen S. Globalization and its discontents. New York: The New Press, 1998. 253 p.
Mundy K. Globalization and educational change: New policy worlds. In: Bascia N., Cumming A., Datnow A., Leithwood K., Livingstone D. (eds.) International handbook of educational policy. Springer International Handbooks of Education. Vol. 13. Springer, Dordrecht, 2005. 1116 p.
Dale R. Globalisation and education: Demonstrating a common world educational culture or locating a globally structured educational agenda Educational Theory. 2000. No. 50 (4). Pp. 427-448.
Hirst P., Thompson G. Globalisation in question. The international economy and the possibilities of governance. Cambridge, Polity Press, 1996. 631 p.
Haass R. The age of non-polarity: What will follow US Dominance Foreign Affairs. 2008. No. 87 (3). P. 44-56.
Meyer J.W. The world polity and the authority of the nation-state. A. Bergesen (ed.); Studies of the Modern World-System. New York: Academic Press, 1980. Rr. 109-137.
Meyer J., Boli J., Thomas G., Ramirez F. World society and the nation-state. American Journal of Sociology. 1997. No. 103 (1). Pr. 144-181.
Dugin A.G. Teoriya mnogopolyarnogo mira. Plyuriversum. M.: Akademicheskiy proekt, 2015. 532 c.
Rosencrance R. Action and reaction in world politics: International systems in perspective. Praeger, 1963. 314 p.
Ball S.J. Global education Inc: New policy networks and the neo-liberal imaginary. New York: Routledge, 2012. 184 p.
Levi Faur D. Varieties of regulatory capitalism: Getting the most persistence of national variation. Governance. 2006. No. 19 (3). Pr. 367-382.
Dale R., Robertson S. Beyond methodological isms in comparative education in an era of globalisation. In: Handbook on comparative education. F. Kazamias, R. Cowan (eds.). Netherlands: Springer, 2007. Pr. 19-32.
Makazhanova ZH.M. Polikul turnost v sovremennom obrazovanii, ili chem otlichaetsya polikul turnost ot mul tikul turalizma // Nepreryvnoe obrazovanie: XXI vek. 2018. № 3 (23). C. 106-113.
CHuchin-Rusov A.E. Kul turnyy plyuralizm // Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost . 1995. № 4. URL: http://ecsocman. hse.ru/data/489/736/1216/019 Chuchin-Rusov KULTURA.pdf.
Palatkina G.V. Mul ti-kul turnoe obrazovanie v polietnicheskom prostranstve. Astrakhan : Izd-vo Astrakhanskogo gos. ped. un-ta, 2001. 196 c.
Bayer YU.P. Aktornyy podkhod k issledovaniyu global noy obrazovatel noy politiki // Upravlencheskoe konsul tirovanie. 2019. № 3. S. 72-78. DOI: 10.22394/1726-1139- 2019-3-72-78.
TSygankov P.A. Aktory i faktory v mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniyakh i mirovoy politike / Privatizatsiya mirovoy politiki: lokal nye deystviya - global nye rezul taty / pod red. M.M. Lebedevoy. M.: ZAO Goldon-Bi, 2013. C. 30-53.
Lebedeva M.M. Mirovaya politika. M.: Aspekt Press, 2016. 351 c.
Kalyuzhnaya D.E. Sovremennye aktory mirovoy politiki i perekhod k ustoychivomu razvitiyu // Sotsiodinamika. 2013. № 5. S. 45-87. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0158.2013.5.664.
Risse Th. Transnational actors and world politics / Handbook of international relations / Ed. by W. Carsnaes, Th. Risse, B.A. Simmons. London: Sage, 2002. Pr. 251-286.
Fumasoli T., Stensaker V., Vukasovic M. Tackling the multi-actor and multi-level complexity of European governance of knowledge: Transnational actors in focus. European Educational Research Journal. 2018. Vol. 17. No. 3. Pr. 325-334. DOI: 10.1177/1474904117742763.
Bek U. ZHizn v obshchestve global nogo riska - kak s etim spravit sya: kosmopoliticheskiy povorot: lektsiya / per. V. Malakhova. URL: https://www.gorby.ru/userfiles/lekciya ulrih beka.pdf
Piirainen T. Towards a new social order in Russia: Transforming structures in everyday life. University of Helsinki, 1997. 254 p.
Rostou U. Stadii ekonomicheskogo rosta. N yu-York: Izd- vo Frederika A Preger, 1961. 242 s.
Gabrielyan A.M. Mirovye trendy i vyzovy sisteme vysshego obrazovaniya: matritsa effektivnoy politiki reform universiteta // Mirovaya politika. 2017. № 1. S. 37-46. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8671.2017.1.22049.
Izmaylova M.A. Sovremennoe rossiyskoe obrazovanie cherez prizmu global noy obrazovatel noy politiki // Gumanitarnye nauki. Vestnik Finansovogo universiteta. 2018. № 8 (4). S. 36-43. DOI: 10.26794/2226-7867-2018-8-4-36-43.
Global education futures. Educational ecosystems for societal transformation. 26.04.2018. URL: http://www.globaledufutures.org/images/people/GEF april26-min.pdf
Keywords:
globalization, education, global educational policy, driving forces of development, scenarios, actors of global educational policy.
Related Articles
Theoretical and Historical Legal Sciences Pages: 11-16 DOI: 10.33693/2782-7372-2024-3-2-11-16 Issue №108322
Legal Problems of Ensuring Food Security in Modern Russia in the Context of Globalization and Mutual Restrictive Measures
globalization
regulation
security
monitoring
restrictive measures
Show more
THEORY AND HISTORY OF LAW Pages: 14-19 Issue №46133
Legal Support for Mentoring in Russia: Perspective and Retrospective View
legal science
mentoring
mentor
mentored
legislation
Show more
ТЕОРЕТИКО-ИСТОРИЧЕСКИЕ ПРАВОВЫЕ НАУКИ (СПЕЦИАЛЬНОСТЬ 5.1.1.) Pages: 15-18 Issue №24364
The Problem of the Impact of Globalization on State Sovereignty
globalization
state sovereignty
conflict interaction
international relations
denazification
Show more
1. THEORY AND HISTORY OF STATE AND LAW, HISTORICAL STUDIES OF LAW AND STATE (12.00.01) Pages: 15-20 Issue №17728
Humanization of national law in the direction of globalization
humanization
humanization of law
humanization of legislation
globalization
legal globalization
Show more
1. PHILOSOPHY AND VALUES OF MODERN SOCIETY Pages: 6-15 Issue №3724
THREATS AND CHALLENGES TO MODERN RUSSIA THROUGH THE PRISM OF PROPHECY OF «CLAB OF ROME»
geopolitics
globalization
"Golden billion"
corruption
international relations
Show more
1. THEORY AND HISTORY OF STATE AND LAW, HISTORICAL STUDIES OF LAW AND STATE (12.00.01) Pages: 22-25 Issue №18617
Development of legal education in modern society: basic approaches
education
socio-economic conditions
ready to solve problems
law
state
Show more
Theoretical and Historical Legal Sciences Pages: 35-43 DOI: 10.33693/2072-3164-2025-18-3-35-43 Issue №207795
Digital Educational Platforms in Modern Russian Legal Regulation (Some Features of Terminology)
digitalization
education
digital educational platforms
massive open online courses
Show more
1. THEORETICAL AND HISTORICAL LEGAL SCIENCES (5.1.1.) Pages: 29-34 Issue №22457
Legal Support for the Implementation of the Educational Function in the Context of Generation Experience Transfer
legal science
legislation
implementation of law
education
legal education
Show more
1. NATIONAL ECONOMY AND MANAGEMENT 08.00.05 Pages: 35-39 Issue №19457
Specific Threats to the Financial Security and Sustainability of the Russian Federation in the Context of the Global Market
globalization
economic security
transnational corporations
financial sovereignty
international financial market
Show more
1. THEORY AND HISTORY OF STATE AND LAW, HISTORICAL STUDIES OF LAW AND STATE (12.00.01) Pages: 25-33 Issue №18132
Legal literacy and legal education in the conditions of modern society: lessons of the all-russian emergency commission for the elimination of illiterness in 1920
legal education
legal literacy
legal culture
legal education
legal awareness
Show more