THE IMPACT OF THE DECISIONS OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION ON THE REFORM OF THE INSTITUTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE RESPONSIBILITY
( Pp. 178-183)

More about authors
Makareiko Nikolay V. doktor yuridicheskih nauk, docent, professor kafedry administrativnogo prava i processa
Nizhny Novgorod Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia
Abstract:
The object of the study was public relations in the area of consolidating administrative responsibility, and the subject was the norms contained in the Administrative Code of the Russian Federation, the legal positions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation. The article analyzes the impact of the decisions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation on the change of legislation on administrative offenses. The controversy of individual legal positions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, the presence of provisions in the CAO RF that do not comply with the Constitution of the Russian Federation is noted. It is concluded that, on the one hand, the rulings of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation had a positive impact on the reform of the legislation on administrative offenses, and on the other hand, there was some uncertainty in the rulings of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation that did not affect the legislator, who made the necessary changes to the reform activities Administrative Code.
How to Cite:
Makareiko N.V., (2019), THE IMPACT OF THE DECISIONS OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION ON THE REFORM OF THE INSTITUTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE RESPONSIBILITY. Sociopolitical Sciences, 2 => 178-183.
Reference list:
Baranova M.V. Operezhayushchee pravotvorchestvo v pravovoy sisteme sovremennosti / M.V. Baranova // Vestnik Saratovskoy gosudarstvennoy yuridicheskoy akademii. 2015. № 1 (108). S. 43-45.
Vitruk N.V. Obshchaya teoriya yuridicheskoy otvetstvennosti: monografiya / N.V. Vitruk. M.: RAP, 2008. 324 s.
Ivan Aleksandrovich Galagan i ego nauchnoe issledovanie / pod red. YU.N. Starilova. Voronezh: Izdatel stvo Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2010. 544 s.
Lipinskiy, D. A. Problemy yuridicheskoy otvetstvennosti / D.A. Lipinskiy; pod red. d-ra yurid. nauk R.L. KHachaturova. SPb.: Izd-vo YUridicheskiy tsentr Press , 2003. 387 s.
Lipinskiy D.A., Musatkina A.A. Voprosy al ternativnykh administrativno-pravovykh sanktsiy v resheniyakh Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF / D.A. Lipinskiy, A.A. Musatkina // Administrativnoe i munitsipal noe pravo. 2017. № 7. S. 1-16.
Maksimov I.V. Sistema administrativnykh nakazaniy po zakonodatel stvu Rossiyskoy Federatsii / I.V. Maksimov; pod red. N.M. Konina. Saratov: Izd-vo GOU VPO Saratovskaya gosudarstvennaya akademiya prava , 2004. 188 s.
Publichnyy interes v administrativnom prave / pod obshch. red. S.F. Zapol skogo, N.G. Salishchevoy, V.V. Al khimenko. M.: Inst. gos. i prava RAN, Akademicheskiy pravovoy institut, 2015. 304 s.
Rossinskiy B.V. Nekotorye problemy i perspektivy razvitiya administrativnoy otvetstvennosti / B.V. Rossinskiy // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. 2017. № 6. S. 38-42.
Salishcheva N.G. Problemy sovershenstvovaniya norm Kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh / N.G. Salishcheva // Aktual nye problemy sovershenstvovaniya zakonodatel stva ob administrativnoy otvetstvennosti: materialy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii. 30 maya 2013 g., Moskva / otv. red. M.A. SHtatina. M.: RAP, 2014. S. 8-19.
Skokov A.V. Pravila naznacheniya administrativnykh nakazaniy / A.V. Skokov // Aktual nye problemy sovershenstvovaniya zakonodatel stva ob administrativnoy otvetstvennosti: materialy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii. 30 maya 2013 g., Moskva / otv. red. M.A. SHtatina. M.: RAP, 2014.S. 44-50.
Sorokin V.D. Kommentariy izbrannykh mest Kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh / V.D. Sorokin // YUridicheskaya mysl . 2002. № 4 (10). S. 3-85.
Trufanov M.E. Blanketnost norm administrativnogo prava / M.E. Trufanov: uchebnoe posobie. Krasnodar: Krasnodarskiy universitet MVD Rossii, 2015. 62 s.