THE CONCEPT, SIGNS AND CRITERIA OF A MINOR ACT
( Pp. 128-133)

Background: Investigate the concept, signs of insignificance of an act, as well as to develop criteria for determining the small social significance of a specific criminal action or inaction based on an analysis of law enforcement practice. Materials and methods: In solving the problems posed, the author used general scientific (for example, the method of system analysis) and special scientific methods of cognition (in particular, comparative legal and the method of legal interpretation). Results: Based on the study, the author: formulates the concept, signs and criteria of a minor act; explains the impossibility of recognizing minor acts committed by negligence; argues that the criteria for the minor act can only be signs of the objective side of the crime, while the signs of the subjective side can serve as an additional guideline when establishing the low social minor of a specific criminal act or inaction; substantiates that the signs of the object and subject of the crime cannot act as criteria for recognizing the act as minor. Practical importance of results: The conclusions made by the author can be used to improve the quality of the legislative requirement formulated in part 2 of article 14 of the Criminal Code, as well as in law enforcement when deciding whether to commit a criminal offense (action or inaction) as insignificant.

Daria A.K., (2019), THE CONCEPT, SIGNS AND CRITERIA OF A MINOR ACT. Sociopolitical Sciences, 5 => 128-133.

Bagirov CH.M. Maloznachitel nost deyaniya i ee ugolovno-pravovoe znachenie: dis. kand. yurid. nauk. Tyumen , 2005.
Vinokurov V.N. Maloznachitel nost deyaniya v ugolovnom prave: priznaki i formy // ZHurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2014. № 4.
Vinokurov V.N. Ob ekt prestupleniya: doktrinal no-prikladnoe issledovanie. 2019.
Grishaev P.I., Kriger G.A. Souchastie po sovetskomu ugolovnomu pravu. M.: Gosyurizdat, 1959.
Gordienko V. V. Zakonodatel nye novelly i ikh rol v povyshenii effektivnosti bor by s prestupnost yu // Rossiyskiy sledovatel . 2011. № 16.
Durmanov N.D. Ponyatie prestupleniya. M., 1967
Karpushin M.P., Kurlyandskiy V.I. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost i sostav prestupleniya. M., 1974.
Koval chuk A.V. Maloznachitel nost deyaniya kak sredstvo opredeleniya granits prestupnogo: pravovaya priroda, problemy pravoprimeneniya i zakonodatel nogo zakrepleniya. Minsk: Akademiya MVD, 2016.
Kovalev M.I. Souchastie v prestuplenii // Uchenye zapiski Seriya Ugolovnoe pravo , Sverdlovsk, 1962. T. 5.
Kommentariy k Ugolovnomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii / otv. redaktor A.A. CHekalin. M.: YUrayt, 2007.
Kuznetsova N.F. Znachenie prestupnykh posledstviy dlya ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti. M., 1958.
Lobanova L.V., Rozhnov A.P. O konkretizatsii teoreticheskikh podkhodov k ustanovleniyu maloznachitel nosti deyaniya, sovershaemogo v sfere pravosudiya // YUridicheskaya nauka. 2017. № 5.
Rogova E.V. Maloznachitel nost deyaniya v zarubezhnom i rossiyskom ugolovnom zakonodatel stve // Nauchnyy vestnik Omskoy akademii MVD Rossii. 2012. № 4 (47).
Solov ev A.N. Ponyatie prestupleniya: teoreticheskie, zakonodatel nye i pravoprimenitel nye aspekty: dis. kand. yurid. nauk. Volgograd, 2000.
Sotskov F.N. Obshchestvennaya opasnost deyaniya v ugolovnom prave Rossii: avtoref. dis. kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2009.
Stepanov V.V. Maloznachitel nost pravonarusheniya v rossiyskom prave: avtoref. dis. kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2009.
Tel nov P.F. Otvetstvennost za souchastie v prestuplenii. M.: YUridicheskaya literatura, 1974.
TSereteli T.V. Prichinnaya svyaz v ugolovnom prave. M.: Gosyurizdat, 1963.
SHarapov R.D. Maloznachitel nost vzyatochnichestva // ZHurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2017. № 12.

social danger, interdisciplinary differentiation, minor act, criminal misconduct.