EVOLUTION AND DIRECTIONS OF IMPROVEMENT OF LEGAL GUARANTEES OF PERFORMANCE UNDERSTANDED ITS OBLIGATIONS
( Pp. 67-70)
More about authors
Andrey G. Smolin
Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor of the Department of Criminal Law and Procedure; Middle-Volga Institute (branch) of the Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education "All-Russian State University of Justice (RPA of the Ministry of Justice of Russia)"
Middle-Volga Institute (branch) of the Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education "All-Russian State University of Justice (RPA of the Ministry of Justice of Russia)"
Saransk, Russian Federation Iuliya N. Sushkova Dr. Sci. (Hist.), Professor, Professor of the Theory, History of the State and Law and International Law Department, senior scientific researcher of the Ural-Povolzie Department
National Research Ogarev Mordovia State University; N.N. Miklukho-Maklai Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology
Saransk, Russian Federation; Moscow, Russian Federation Aleksandr V. Shigurov Cand. Sci. (Law), Head of the Department of Criminal Law and Procedure; Middle-Volga Institute (branch) of the Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education "All-Russian State University of Justice (RPA of the Ministry of Justice of Russia)"
Middle-Volga Institute (branch) of the Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education "All-Russian State University of Justice (RPA of the Ministry of Justice of Russia)"
Saransk, Russian Federation
Middle-Volga Institute (branch) of the Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education "All-Russian State University of Justice (RPA of the Ministry of Justice of Russia)"
Saransk, Russian Federation Iuliya N. Sushkova Dr. Sci. (Hist.), Professor, Professor of the Theory, History of the State and Law and International Law Department, senior scientific researcher of the Ural-Povolzie Department
National Research Ogarev Mordovia State University; N.N. Miklukho-Maklai Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology
Saransk, Russian Federation; Moscow, Russian Federation Aleksandr V. Shigurov Cand. Sci. (Law), Head of the Department of Criminal Law and Procedure; Middle-Volga Institute (branch) of the Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education "All-Russian State University of Justice (RPA of the Ministry of Justice of Russia)"
Middle-Volga Institute (branch) of the Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education "All-Russian State University of Justice (RPA of the Ministry of Justice of Russia)"
Saransk, Russian Federation
Abstract:
The article provides an overview of the legal guarantees used by the Russian legislator at different stages of historical development (from Sudebnik 1497 to the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation) of fulfilling their duties in a conscientious manner: establishing qualifications, responsibility, including criminal responsibility, paying remuneration to the witnesses and reimbursement. The authors come to the conclusion about the inadmissibility of the forcible involvement of citizens to participate as witnesses and the need to develop a system of material incentives for the conscientious performance of their duties by the witnesses. Based on the analysis of criminal procedure legislation and law enforcement practice, the authors propose to fix in Part 2 of Art. 60 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation prohibits participation as witnesses of persons who are directly or indirectly dependent on the parties, and introduce responsibility for concealing information from the investigator (inquiry officer) about the fact of such dependence.
How to Cite:
Andrey G.S., Iuliya N.S., Aleksandr V.S., (2019), EVOLUTION AND DIRECTIONS OF IMPROVEMENT OF LEGAL GUARANTEES OF PERFORMANCE UNDERSTANDED ITS OBLIGATIONS. Sociopolitical Sciences, 2 => 67-70.
Reference list:
Bovt G. Tut nam podbrasyvayut. URL: https://www.gazeta.ru/column/bovt/3832550.shtml
Borodikhin A. Litsa zhivotnykh s natsistskimi znakami . V Omske uborshchitsa TSentra E vystupaet ponyatoy po delam o repostakh. URL: https://zona.media /article/2017/06/21/clean.
Vinokurova E. Ponyatykh vyvodyat za shtat. URL: https://www.gazeta.ru/politics/2011/06/01 a 3635885.shtml.
Kamynin I. D. Dopustimost dokazatel stv // Ugolovnyy protsess. - 2006. - № 4. -S. 64-68.
Kassatsionnoe opredelenie Sudebnoy kollegii po ugolovnym delam Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 1 dekabrya 2005 g. № 49-o05-73. // Dokument opublikovan ne byl. Dostup iz spravochnoy pravovoy sistemy Konsul tantPlyus .
Kashtanova N. S. Istoriko-filosofskoe obosnovanie tselesoobraznosti ukrepleniya instituta imushchestvennogo prinuzhdeniya v ugolovnom protsesse // Vestnik Omskogo universiteta. Seriya: Pravo. - 2006. - № 3-4 (8-9). - S. 183-188.
Kommentariy k Ugolovno-protsessual nomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Pod obshch. i nauchn. red. A. YA. Sukhareva. - M: Norma-Infra-M, 2002. - 1104 c.
Obzor dopushchennykh narusheniy ugolovnogo i ugolovno-protsessual nogo zakona, pri prinyatii sudebnykh resheniy, po rezul tatam kassatsionnogo i nadzornogo rassmotreniya ugolovnykh del Kusinskogo rayonnogo suda CHelyabinskoy oblasti v 2007 g. - pervom polugodii 2008 g. URL: http://kusa.chel.sudrf.ru/modules.php name docum sud id 76.
Ob yasnitel naya zapiska k proektu Ustava Ugolovnogo Sudoproizvodstva. URL: http://jurytrial.ru/media/files/library/file623.pdf.
Prigovor Privolzhskogo rayonnogo suda Astrakhanskoy oblasti ot 20.08.2015 po ugolovnomu delu № 1-147/2015. URL: http://sudact.ru/regular/doc/4UAzxlcd14v.
Sinel shchikov YU. P. Nezavisimost sudov po sudebnoy reforme 1864 goda i sovremennost . URL: https://kprf.ru/dep/gosduma/activities/135567.html.
SHCHuplenkov N. O. Formy grazhdanskogo kontrolya v sudoproizvodstve Drevney Rusi // YUridicheskie issledovaniya. - 2014. - № 11. - S. 36-60.
Borodikhin A. Litsa zhivotnykh s natsistskimi znakami . V Omske uborshchitsa TSentra E vystupaet ponyatoy po delam o repostakh. URL: https://zona.media /article/2017/06/21/clean.
Vinokurova E. Ponyatykh vyvodyat za shtat. URL: https://www.gazeta.ru/politics/2011/06/01 a 3635885.shtml.
Kamynin I. D. Dopustimost dokazatel stv // Ugolovnyy protsess. - 2006. - № 4. -S. 64-68.
Kassatsionnoe opredelenie Sudebnoy kollegii po ugolovnym delam Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 1 dekabrya 2005 g. № 49-o05-73. // Dokument opublikovan ne byl. Dostup iz spravochnoy pravovoy sistemy Konsul tantPlyus .
Kashtanova N. S. Istoriko-filosofskoe obosnovanie tselesoobraznosti ukrepleniya instituta imushchestvennogo prinuzhdeniya v ugolovnom protsesse // Vestnik Omskogo universiteta. Seriya: Pravo. - 2006. - № 3-4 (8-9). - S. 183-188.
Kommentariy k Ugolovno-protsessual nomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Pod obshch. i nauchn. red. A. YA. Sukhareva. - M: Norma-Infra-M, 2002. - 1104 c.
Obzor dopushchennykh narusheniy ugolovnogo i ugolovno-protsessual nogo zakona, pri prinyatii sudebnykh resheniy, po rezul tatam kassatsionnogo i nadzornogo rassmotreniya ugolovnykh del Kusinskogo rayonnogo suda CHelyabinskoy oblasti v 2007 g. - pervom polugodii 2008 g. URL: http://kusa.chel.sudrf.ru/modules.php name docum sud id 76.
Ob yasnitel naya zapiska k proektu Ustava Ugolovnogo Sudoproizvodstva. URL: http://jurytrial.ru/media/files/library/file623.pdf.
Prigovor Privolzhskogo rayonnogo suda Astrakhanskoy oblasti ot 20.08.2015 po ugolovnomu delu № 1-147/2015. URL: http://sudact.ru/regular/doc/4UAzxlcd14v.
Sinel shchikov YU. P. Nezavisimost sudov po sudebnoy reforme 1864 goda i sovremennost . URL: https://kprf.ru/dep/gosduma/activities/135567.html.
SHCHuplenkov N. O. Formy grazhdanskogo kontrolya v sudoproizvodstve Drevney Rusi // YUridicheskie issledovaniya. - 2014. - № 11. - S. 36-60.
