DIRECTIONS OF IMPROVING THE INSTITUTE OF RETURN OF THE CRIMINAL PROSECUTOR
( Pp. 247-250)
More about authors
Shigurova Elena I.
Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor; Associate Professor of the Department of Criminal Procedure, Justice and Prosecutorial Supervision of the Law Institute
National Research Mordovia State University
Saransk, Republic of Mordovia, Russian Federation Aleksandr V. Shigurov Cand. Sci. (Law), Head of the Department of Criminal Law and Procedure; Middle-Volga Institute (branch) of the Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education "All-Russian State University of Justice (RPA of the Ministry of Justice of Russia)"
Middle-Volga Institute (branch) of the Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education "All-Russian State University of Justice (RPA of the Ministry of Justice of Russia)"
Saransk, Russian Federation
National Research Mordovia State University
Saransk, Republic of Mordovia, Russian Federation Aleksandr V. Shigurov Cand. Sci. (Law), Head of the Department of Criminal Law and Procedure; Middle-Volga Institute (branch) of the Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education "All-Russian State University of Justice (RPA of the Ministry of Justice of Russia)"
Middle-Volga Institute (branch) of the Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education "All-Russian State University of Justice (RPA of the Ministry of Justice of Russia)"
Saransk, Russian Federation
Abstract:
The article examines the problems of applying the grounds for the return of a criminal case to the prosecutor, stipulated in clauses 5, 6, part 1 and part 1.2 of Art. 237 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The analysis of Russian and foreign procedural legislation, practice of its application allowed the authors to conclude that Article 5 part 1 of Art. 237 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to the principle of competitiveness. The article suggests: to prohibit judges, who returned the case on this grounds on their own initiative, to participate in further consideration of the case; delete item 5 of part 1 of Art. 237 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation, to impose on judges the duty to establish this ground independently to explain to the accused the rights provided for in cl. 217 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation, and provide an opportunity to file appropriate motions.
How to Cite:
Shigurova E.I., Aleksandr V.S., (2018), DIRECTIONS OF IMPROVING THE INSTITUTE OF RETURN OF THE CRIMINAL PROSECUTOR. Economic Problems and Legal Practice, 3 => 247-250.
Reference list:
Kalinkina L.D. Vozvrashchenie ugolovnogo dela sudom prokuroru v poryadke stat i 237 UPK RF: Uchebnoe posobie. Saransk, 2013. 56 s.
Kalinkina L.D. Problemy vozvrashcheniya ugolovnogo dela prokuroru dlya ustraneniya prepyatstviy ego rassmotreniya sudom // Vestnik ekonomiki, prava i sotsiologii. 2007. № 4. S. 46-54.
Kalinkina L.D., SHigurova E.I., Sukhova O.A., Krysina N.R., ZHadyaeva M.A., Mamaev I.N., Vasyaev A.A., Fadeeva E.I., YAkomaskina V.V., Boltunova M.I., Kuryaeva D.R., Firsov S.N. Apellyatsionnoe proizvodstvo v Rossiyskom ugolovnom protsesse / Pod obshchey redaktsiey L. D. Kalinkinoy. Saransk, 2014. 208 s.
Oksyuk T.L. Vozvrashchenie ugolovnogo dela prokuroru // Ugolovnyy protsess. 2005. № 1. S. 23-27.
Po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti polozheniy chasti pervoy stat i 237 Ugolovno-protsessual nogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii v svyazi s zhaloboy grazhdanina Respubliki Uzbekistan B.T. Gadaeva i zaprosom Kurganskogo oblastnogo suda: Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 02.07.2013 № 16-P // Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF. 2013. № 28. St. 3881.
Postanovlenie Armizonskogo rayonnogo suda Tyumenskoy oblasti ot 2.06.2014 po ugolovnomu delu № 1-12/2014. URL: https://armizonsky--tum.sudrf.ru/modules.php name sud delo srv num 1 name op doc number 10289694 delo id 1540006 new 0 text number 1.
Postanovlenie mirovogo sud i sudebnogo uchastka № 5 Zavodskogo rayona goroda Saratova ot 22.09.2015 po ugolovnomu delu № 1-36/2015. URL: http://46.sar.msudrf.ru//modules.php name sud delo op sd number 2364357 delo id 1540006.
Prigovor Zavodskogo rayonnogo suda g. Saratova Saratovskoy oblasti ot 27.04.2016 po ugolovnomu delu ot № 1-116/2016. URL: https://zavodskoi--sar.sudrf.ru/modules.php name sud delo srv num 1 name op case n c 1 case id 34174053 delo id 1540006.
Svodnye statisticheskie svedeniya o deyatel nosti federal nykh sudov obshchey yurisdiktsii i mirovykh sudey za 2017-2007 gg. URL: http://www.cdep.ru/index.php id 79.
Sushkova YU.N. O deyatel nosti volostnykh sudov (po dokumentam tsentral nogo gosudarstvennogo arkhiva Respubliki Mordoviya) // Sotsial no-politicheskie nauki. 2017. № 2. S. 161-165.
Sushkova YU.N., CHistyakov V.V. Probely rossiyskogo zakonodatel stva : ot problem pravovogo polozheniya korennykh narodov do zashchity prav lichnosti v ugolovnom protsesse // Sotsial no-politicheskie nauki. 2012. № 1. S. 7-8.
Kalinkina L.D. Problemy vozvrashcheniya ugolovnogo dela prokuroru dlya ustraneniya prepyatstviy ego rassmotreniya sudom // Vestnik ekonomiki, prava i sotsiologii. 2007. № 4. S. 46-54.
Kalinkina L.D., SHigurova E.I., Sukhova O.A., Krysina N.R., ZHadyaeva M.A., Mamaev I.N., Vasyaev A.A., Fadeeva E.I., YAkomaskina V.V., Boltunova M.I., Kuryaeva D.R., Firsov S.N. Apellyatsionnoe proizvodstvo v Rossiyskom ugolovnom protsesse / Pod obshchey redaktsiey L. D. Kalinkinoy. Saransk, 2014. 208 s.
Oksyuk T.L. Vozvrashchenie ugolovnogo dela prokuroru // Ugolovnyy protsess. 2005. № 1. S. 23-27.
Po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti polozheniy chasti pervoy stat i 237 Ugolovno-protsessual nogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii v svyazi s zhaloboy grazhdanina Respubliki Uzbekistan B.T. Gadaeva i zaprosom Kurganskogo oblastnogo suda: Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 02.07.2013 № 16-P // Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF. 2013. № 28. St. 3881.
Postanovlenie Armizonskogo rayonnogo suda Tyumenskoy oblasti ot 2.06.2014 po ugolovnomu delu № 1-12/2014. URL: https://armizonsky--tum.sudrf.ru/modules.php name sud delo srv num 1 name op doc number 10289694 delo id 1540006 new 0 text number 1.
Postanovlenie mirovogo sud i sudebnogo uchastka № 5 Zavodskogo rayona goroda Saratova ot 22.09.2015 po ugolovnomu delu № 1-36/2015. URL: http://46.sar.msudrf.ru//modules.php name sud delo op sd number 2364357 delo id 1540006.
Prigovor Zavodskogo rayonnogo suda g. Saratova Saratovskoy oblasti ot 27.04.2016 po ugolovnomu delu ot № 1-116/2016. URL: https://zavodskoi--sar.sudrf.ru/modules.php name sud delo srv num 1 name op case n c 1 case id 34174053 delo id 1540006.
Svodnye statisticheskie svedeniya o deyatel nosti federal nykh sudov obshchey yurisdiktsii i mirovykh sudey za 2017-2007 gg. URL: http://www.cdep.ru/index.php id 79.
Sushkova YU.N. O deyatel nosti volostnykh sudov (po dokumentam tsentral nogo gosudarstvennogo arkhiva Respubliki Mordoviya) // Sotsial no-politicheskie nauki. 2017. № 2. S. 161-165.
Sushkova YU.N., CHistyakov V.V. Probely rossiyskogo zakonodatel stva : ot problem pravovogo polozheniya korennykh narodov do zashchity prav lichnosti v ugolovnom protsesse // Sotsial no-politicheskie nauki. 2012. № 1. S. 7-8.
Keywords:
the criminal process, the judge, criminal case, return, the Prosecutor, violation, criminal procedure law, the prosecution.
