Historical Stages of Formation of the Doctrine on the Protection of the Weak Party of the Contract
( Pp. 72-81)

The purpose of the research is to analyze the history of emergence and development of the doctrine of protection of the weak party of the contract in civil law science. In the article the authors conclude that the idea of protection the weak party of the contract arose in Antiquity and the Middle Ages. The authors especially noted that the modern development of ideas about the protection of the weak party of the contract is associated with the appearance in the French legal doctrine of the contract of adhesion. In the scientific work, three models of protection the weak party of the contract, which have been formed since the middle of the 20th century in the American and European space, have been studied. The stages of the formation of a similar doctrine in Russia are reflected. The authors concluded that there is no single concept of protection of the weak party of the contract in the civil law of foreign countries and Russia.

Kuzmina A.V., Ekaterina A.L., (2022), HISTORICAL STAGES OF FORMATION OF THE DOCTRINE ON THE PROTECTION OF THE WEAK PARTY OF THE CONTRACT. Economic Problems and Legal Practice, 5 => 72-81.

Braginskij M.I., Vitryanskij V.V. Contract Law: General Provisions. М., 2011. 847 p.
Vitryanskij V.V. Reform of the Russian civil legislation: intermediate results. М., 2017. 432 p.
Karapetov A.G. Contra proferentem as a method of interpreting the contract // Bulletin of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation. 2013. № 7. P. 6-35.
Karapetov A.G. Freedom of contract and its limits: in 2 vols. V.1. Theoretical, historical and political and legal foundations of the principle of freedom of contract and its limitations. М.: Statute, 2012. 452 p. 1 vol.
Karapetov A.G. Freedom of contract and its limits: in 2 vols. V.2. Limits of freedom to determine the terms of the contract in foreign and Russian law. М.: Statute, 2012. 453 p. 2 vol.
Klochkov A.A. Standard (general) terms of contracts in commercial circulation: legal regulation in Russia and foreign countries: Dis. ... cand. legal sciences: 12.00.03. М., 2000. 210 p.
Kuzmina A.V. Formation of the doctrine of the protection of the weak party in contract law // Bulletin of the Perm university. Legal sciences. 2019. №. 46. P. 704-705.
Makeenkov I.A. Ways to protecting of the weak side of the accession agreement from unfair contractual terms: civil law and antimonopoly aspects // Civil law. 2018. № 5. P. 38-40.
Makovskij A.L. About codification of civil law (1922-2006). М., 2010. 736 p.
Medvedev S.N. Laesio enormis in Roman and modern civil law // North caucasian legal bulletin. 2010. № 2. P. 34.
Mullina Yu.N. Control over unfair contractual terms: Russian law in a comparative legal perspective // Experiences of civil law research: a collection of articles / hands ed. coll. and resp. ed. A.M. Shirvindt, N.B. Shcherbakov. M.: Statut, 2016. P. 196-224.
Myagkova O.I. Protection of the weak party from unfair contract terms in Russian civil law // Russian journal of law. 2016. № 1. P. 123-135.
Noviczkij I.B., Luncz L.A. The general doctrine of obligation. M.: Gosjurizdat, 1950. 416 p.
Petinenko I.A. Fair prices: theoretical aspect // Vestn. Tomsk state university. Economy. 2011. № 2 (14). P. 37.
Savel`ev A.I. Contract of adhesion in Russian civil law // Bulletin of civil law. 2010. № 5. P.13.
Slaveczkij D.V. The principle of protection of the weak side of the civil contract: Dis. ... cand. legal sciences: 12.00.03. Samara, 2004. 204 p.
Tuzov D.O., Chichkan E.V., Sargsyan A.M. Protection of consumers from unfair contractual terms in Italian law (in comparison with Russian regulation) // Law. 2021. № 9. P. 150-183.
Khuzhokova I.M. The doctrine of good morals and public order in contract law. Moscow: Norm, 2011. 208 p.
Cyplenkova A.V. Contract of adhesion as a special category of civil law: Dis. ... cand. legal sciences: 12.00.03. М., 2002. 202 p.
Shapp Ya. The system of German civil law. M.: International relations, 2006. 357 p.
Baculin A.F., Kuzmina A.V., Miagkova O.I. Contract of Adhesion and Conceptional Changes in Russian Contract Law // Review of European Studies. 2015. January 1. R.22-23.
D Onfro D.F. A New Uniform Code of Consumer Credit // Harvard Law Policy Review. 2011. Vol. 5. № 2. P. 449-450.
Duncan N.K. Adhesion Contracts: A Twentieth Century Problem for a Nineteenth Century Code // La. L. Rev. 1974. № 34. URL: https://digitalcommons.law.lsu.edu/lalrev/vol34/iss5/11 (data obrashcheniya 09.03.2022).
Feinman J.M., Edwards C., Poritz D.T. Henningsen V. Bloomfield Motors, Inc. (1960): Promoting Product Safety by Protecting Consumers of Defective Goods. Courting Justice: Ten New Jersey Cases That Shook the Nation, edited by Paul L. Tractenberg, Ithaca, NY: Rutgers University Press. 2013. P. 5-22. URL: https://doi.org/10.36019/9780813561608-003 (data obrashcheniya: 06.04.2022).
Kessler. F. Contracts of Adhesion-Some Thoughts About Freedom of Contract // Colum. L. Rev. 1943. № 43. P. 635.
Patterson. E. The Delivery of A Life-Insurance Policy // Harv. L. Rev. 1919. № 33. P. 222.
Rakoff T. Contracts of Adhesion: An Essay in Reconstruction // Harv. L. Rev. 1982. № 96. P. 1174-1177.
Saxe S.L. Contracts of Adhesion Under California Law // University of San Francisco law review. 1966. Vol. 1: Iss. 1. Article 19. P. 308-309.
Slawson W.D. Standard Form Contracts and Democratic Control of Lawmaking Power // Harv. L. Rev. 1971. № 84. P. 529-530.
Smith S. Reforming the Law of Adhesion Contracts: A Judicial Response to the Subprime Mortgage Crisis // Lewis Clark Law Review, Forthcoming, Marquette Law School Legal Studies. 2009. № 09-34. P. 1096-1097.
Zimmermann R. The Law of Obligations. Roman Foundations of the Civilian Tradition. Oxford, 1996. P. 166-168.

contract of adhesion, inequality of bargaining power, weak party of the contract.