Regarding the cancellation of the commercial concession agreements
( Pp. 232-236)

Objective. Commercial concession agreement is the most important legal mechanism in franchising transactions. The aim of the current article is to examine the legal regulation of the commercial concession agreements cancellation, and to find its weaknesses. It is based on the existing courts practice. This topic was only briefly observed in the legal literature, despite rather wide enforcement base. The further research is needed to improve the Russian franchising regulation and to minimize the amount of arising disputes. Conclusions. Based on the analysis of the general and special regulations related to commercial concession agreements cancellation it is stated, that parties have unequal opportunities to protect their infringed rights. The Civil Code of Russia allows the user (franchisee) to protect his rights only through court, although the rights holder (franchisor) has a right to refuse from fulfilling the contract in case of the substantial breach. The reasoning to grant such opportunities to the user is based on the amount of disputes concerning the registration and other obligations of the rights holder.

Mazepov P.E., (2020), REGARDING THE CANCELLATION OF THE COMMERCIAL CONCESSION AGREEMENTS. Economic Problems and Legal Practice, 2 => 232-236.

Philip F. Zeidman. Practice Guide: Franchise // Lexology, 2019.
Gosudarstvennaya programma Ekonomicheskoe razvitie i innovatsionnaya ekonomika // Portal gosprogramm RF elektronnyy resurs . URL:https://programs.gov.ru/Portal/programs/subActionsList gpId 15 pgpId 823E30F2-5B66-4E3A-84B1-9B301293472B
Grazhdanskiy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii (chast vtoraya) ot 26.01.1996 N 14-FZ (red. ot 18.03.2019, s izm. ot 03.07.2019) // Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF , 29.01.1996, N 5, st. 410.
Postanovlenie Suda po intellektual nym pravam № A40-237976/2015 ot 17.10.2016 // Spravochno-pravovaya sistema Elektronnoe pravosudie . URL: http://ras.arbitr.ru
Solomonov E.V., YUritsin A.A. Otvetstvennost storon po dogovoru kommercheskoy kontsessii: voprosy realizatsii na primere soderzhaniya pravootnosheniy // Vestnik OmGU. Seriya. Pravo. 2016. №1 (46). - S. 152-157.
Reshenie Arbitrazhnogo suda goroda Moskvy № A40-169536/2018-134-1177 ot 19.12.2018 // Spravochno-pravovaya sistema Elektronnoe pravosudie . URL: http://ras.arbitr.ru
Postanovlenie Federal nogo Arbitrazhnogo suda Vostochno-Sibirskogo okruga № A33-2466/2012 ot 11.06.2014 // Spravochno-pravovaya sistema Elektronnoe pravosudie . URL: http://ras.arbitr.ru
Eksport: pravo i praktika mezhdunarodnoy torgovli / SHmittgoff K.; Otv. red.: Komarov A.S.; Per.: Basistyy B.A., Vilkova N.G., Didenko V.P., Zaytseva V.V.; Red.: Kuleshova V.I. - M.: YUrid. lit., 1993. - 511 c.
Titova M.N. Pravovoe regulirovanie otnosheniy franchayzinga pri osushchestvlenii predprinimatel skoy deyatel nosti po zakonodatel stvu Rossiyskoy Federatsii: avtoref. dis. k.yu.n.: 12.00.03. - M., 2016.
Postanovlenie Suda po intellektual nym pravam № A56-43646/2011 ot 08.11.2013 // Spravochno-pravovaya sistema Sudebnye i normativnye akty RF . URL: http://sudact.ru
Postanovlenie Suda po intellektual nym pravam № A40-166702/2017 ot 11.04.2019 // Spravochno-pravovaya sistema Elektronnoe pravosudie . URL: http://ras.arbitr.ru

commercial concession, franchising, rights holder, user, contract cancellation, substantial breach.