David Ricardo on investment
( Pp. 146-151)
More about authors
Shpinev Yury S.
Cand. Sci. (Law), Senior Researcher in the Sector of Business and Corporate Law
Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Moscow, Russian Federation
Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Moscow, Russian Federation
Abstract:
The article examines the views of one of the founders of classical economics, David Ricardo, on the issues of investment, capital and profit. The need for this study is caused by the lack of a single definition of investment in the regulatory acts of investment legislation, as well as in the scientific community. Thus, there is a problem of regulatory regulation of one of the most important concepts of the economy. Given that the concepts of investment, capital, and capital investment are primarily economic categories, it seems quite reasonable to consider the emergence and development of these concepts in the retrospect of economic theories, in order to understand the essence of the phenomenon and finally solve the issue of its legal regulation. The scientific novelty of the study is that despite a large number of works on the work of David Ricardo «The Beginnings of Political Economy and Taxation», no special work was carried out on the contribution of the great economist to the theory of investment. Conclusions. The main achievements of Ricardo in the field of capital and investment include the author's definitions of capital, free capital, the creation of a theory of comparative advantages of trade, the division of capital into fixed and circulating capital depending on strength, as well as the description of the reasons that stimulate and hinder foreign investment.
How to Cite:
Shpinev Y.S., (2021), DAVID RICARDO ON INVESTMENT. Economic Problems and Legal Practice, 1 => 146-151.
Reference list:
Abdullaeva Z.M., Magomedova Z.G. Evolyutsiya idey klassicheskoy shkoly politekonomii i ikh vliyanie na sovremennuyu ekonomicheskuyu mysl // Innovatsii. Nauka. Obrazovanie. 2020. № 24. S. 290-298.
Gersonskaya I.V. Nauchnye podkhody k ekonomicheskoy kategorii effektivnost gosudarstvennogo sektora // Vestnik Evraziyskoy nauki. 2020. №2. Tom 12. https://esj.today/PDF/26ECVN220.pdf (dostup svobodnyy). DOI: 10.15862/26ECVN220.
Gloveli G. D. Industrializm i linii raskola v politicheskoy ekonomii // Voprosy politicheskoy ekonomii. 2019. № 4. S. 78-95.
Gogokhiya D.SH. Nekotorye syuzhety iz istorii vneshney torgovli v kontekste teorii deneg // Voprosy teoreticheskoy ekonomiki. 2020. № 4 (9). S. 19-28.
Dubyanskiy A.N. Teoriya renty Rikardo v traktovke Zibera //Terra Economicus. 2020. T. 18. № 3. S. 125-139. DOI: 10.18522/2073-6606-2020-18-3-125-139
ZHulikova O.V., Strizheus A.V. Klassicheskie i postklassicheskie podkhody k trudovoy migratsii kak sotsial no-ekonomicheskomu yavleniyu // Sotsial no-ekonomicheskie yavleniya i protsessy. 2019. T. 14. № 2 (106). S. 21-32. doi: 10.20310/1819-8813-2019-14-2(106)-21-32.
Zakarieva M.N., Gichiev A.N., Gichiev N.S. Traditsionnye i novye teorii mezhdunarodnoy torgovli // UEPS: upravlenie, ekonomika, politika, sotsiologiya. 2019. № 3. S. 91-97.
Zayarnaya I. A., Amelich K. V. Kommercheskie banki i osnova ikh deyatel nosti // Alleya nauki. 2018. T. 1. № 7 (23). S. 522 - 526.
Kene Fransua. Analiz Ekonomicheskie tablitsy / Tyurgo A.R.ZH., Dyupon de Nemur P.S. Fiziokraty. Izbrannye ekonomicheskie proizvedeniya. M. Eksmo. 2008. 1102 c.
Kotukov A. A. Ponyatie konkurentnogo investitsionnogo rynka // Finansy i kredit. 2009. № 1 (337). S. 55-58.
Mamontov V.D., KHaritonova E.V. Vklad v razvitie ekonomicheskoy teorii K. Mengera // Sotsial no-ekonomicheskie yavleniya i protsessy. 2019. T. 14. № 3 (107). S. 61-68. doi: 10.20310/1819-8813-2019-14-3(107)-61-68
Rikardo D. Nachala politicheskoy ekonomii i nalogovogo oblozheniya / Mul timediynoe izdatel stvo Strel bitskogo. 2015. 268 s.
Smit A. Issledovanie o prirode i prichinakh bogatstva narodov / Eksklyuzivnaya klassika. M. Izdatel stvo AST. 2020. 1072 s.
Tyurgo A.R.ZH. Razmyshleniya o sozdanii i raspredelenii bogatstva / Tyurgo A.R.ZH., Dyupon de Nemur P.S. Fiziokraty. Izbrannye ekonomicheskie proizvedeniya. M. Eksmo. 2008. 1102 c.
Ugurchiev O.B., SHakhalieva D.R. Nekotorye osobennosti traktovaniya ponyatiya konkurentsiya // Vestnik Akademii znaniy. 2020. № 4 (39). S. 341-344. DOI: 10.24411/2304.6139.2020.10488.
Fenin K.V. Teoreticheskoe issledovanie kontseptual nogo soderzhaniya dvukh fundamental nykh podkhodov k interpretatsii dinamiki territorial nogo ekonomicheskogo neravenstva // Ekonomicheskie otnosheniya. - 2019. - Tom 9. - № 1. - S. 339-352. doi: 10.18334/eo.9.1.39924.
TSipko A.S. CHego my ne khotim znat o Karle Markse // Rossiya i sovremennyy mir. 2019. № 1 (102). S. 194-206. DOI: 10.31249/rsm/2019.01.13.
CHernyavskiy S.V., Kosobutskiy B.E., Stulovskiy A.E. Kvazirenta kak istochnik stimulirovaniya innovatsionnogo razvitiya v VINK // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ekonomika. 2018. № 43. S. 34-42.
SHumpeter Y. A. Istoriya ekonomicheskogo analiza. V 3-kh t. / Perevod s ang. Pod red. Avtonomova V.S. Spb. : Ekonomicheskaya shkola. 2004. T. 1. 496 c.
YAkutin YU.V., Ivanov V.T. Sovremennaya ekonomika: k otsenke podkhodov ekonomiksovykh avtoritetov (po povodu knigi D. V. Valovogo O chem ne dumayut ekonomisty. Nauchnaya povest ) // Rossiyskiy ekonomicheskiy zhurnal. 2017. № 4. S. 84-89.
Richard Cantillon. Essai sur la nature du commerce en g n ral. / Fran ais modernis par St phane Couvreur. Institut Coppet. Paris. 2011. 94 s. URL: https://www.institutcoppet.org/wp-content /uploads/2011/12/Essai-sur-la-nature-du-commerce-en-gener-Richard-Cantillon.pdf/ (data obrashcheniya: 16.02.2020).
Gersonskaya I.V. Nauchnye podkhody k ekonomicheskoy kategorii effektivnost gosudarstvennogo sektora // Vestnik Evraziyskoy nauki. 2020. №2. Tom 12. https://esj.today/PDF/26ECVN220.pdf (dostup svobodnyy). DOI: 10.15862/26ECVN220.
Gloveli G. D. Industrializm i linii raskola v politicheskoy ekonomii // Voprosy politicheskoy ekonomii. 2019. № 4. S. 78-95.
Gogokhiya D.SH. Nekotorye syuzhety iz istorii vneshney torgovli v kontekste teorii deneg // Voprosy teoreticheskoy ekonomiki. 2020. № 4 (9). S. 19-28.
Dubyanskiy A.N. Teoriya renty Rikardo v traktovke Zibera //Terra Economicus. 2020. T. 18. № 3. S. 125-139. DOI: 10.18522/2073-6606-2020-18-3-125-139
ZHulikova O.V., Strizheus A.V. Klassicheskie i postklassicheskie podkhody k trudovoy migratsii kak sotsial no-ekonomicheskomu yavleniyu // Sotsial no-ekonomicheskie yavleniya i protsessy. 2019. T. 14. № 2 (106). S. 21-32. doi: 10.20310/1819-8813-2019-14-2(106)-21-32.
Zakarieva M.N., Gichiev A.N., Gichiev N.S. Traditsionnye i novye teorii mezhdunarodnoy torgovli // UEPS: upravlenie, ekonomika, politika, sotsiologiya. 2019. № 3. S. 91-97.
Zayarnaya I. A., Amelich K. V. Kommercheskie banki i osnova ikh deyatel nosti // Alleya nauki. 2018. T. 1. № 7 (23). S. 522 - 526.
Kene Fransua. Analiz Ekonomicheskie tablitsy / Tyurgo A.R.ZH., Dyupon de Nemur P.S. Fiziokraty. Izbrannye ekonomicheskie proizvedeniya. M. Eksmo. 2008. 1102 c.
Kotukov A. A. Ponyatie konkurentnogo investitsionnogo rynka // Finansy i kredit. 2009. № 1 (337). S. 55-58.
Mamontov V.D., KHaritonova E.V. Vklad v razvitie ekonomicheskoy teorii K. Mengera // Sotsial no-ekonomicheskie yavleniya i protsessy. 2019. T. 14. № 3 (107). S. 61-68. doi: 10.20310/1819-8813-2019-14-3(107)-61-68
Rikardo D. Nachala politicheskoy ekonomii i nalogovogo oblozheniya / Mul timediynoe izdatel stvo Strel bitskogo. 2015. 268 s.
Smit A. Issledovanie o prirode i prichinakh bogatstva narodov / Eksklyuzivnaya klassika. M. Izdatel stvo AST. 2020. 1072 s.
Tyurgo A.R.ZH. Razmyshleniya o sozdanii i raspredelenii bogatstva / Tyurgo A.R.ZH., Dyupon de Nemur P.S. Fiziokraty. Izbrannye ekonomicheskie proizvedeniya. M. Eksmo. 2008. 1102 c.
Ugurchiev O.B., SHakhalieva D.R. Nekotorye osobennosti traktovaniya ponyatiya konkurentsiya // Vestnik Akademii znaniy. 2020. № 4 (39). S. 341-344. DOI: 10.24411/2304.6139.2020.10488.
Fenin K.V. Teoreticheskoe issledovanie kontseptual nogo soderzhaniya dvukh fundamental nykh podkhodov k interpretatsii dinamiki territorial nogo ekonomicheskogo neravenstva // Ekonomicheskie otnosheniya. - 2019. - Tom 9. - № 1. - S. 339-352. doi: 10.18334/eo.9.1.39924.
TSipko A.S. CHego my ne khotim znat o Karle Markse // Rossiya i sovremennyy mir. 2019. № 1 (102). S. 194-206. DOI: 10.31249/rsm/2019.01.13.
CHernyavskiy S.V., Kosobutskiy B.E., Stulovskiy A.E. Kvazirenta kak istochnik stimulirovaniya innovatsionnogo razvitiya v VINK // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ekonomika. 2018. № 43. S. 34-42.
SHumpeter Y. A. Istoriya ekonomicheskogo analiza. V 3-kh t. / Perevod s ang. Pod red. Avtonomova V.S. Spb. : Ekonomicheskaya shkola. 2004. T. 1. 496 c.
YAkutin YU.V., Ivanov V.T. Sovremennaya ekonomika: k otsenke podkhodov ekonomiksovykh avtoritetov (po povodu knigi D. V. Valovogo O chem ne dumayut ekonomisty. Nauchnaya povest ) // Rossiyskiy ekonomicheskiy zhurnal. 2017. № 4. S. 84-89.
Richard Cantillon. Essai sur la nature du commerce en g n ral. / Fran ais modernis par St phane Couvreur. Institut Coppet. Paris. 2011. 94 s. URL: https://www.institutcoppet.org/wp-content /uploads/2011/12/Essai-sur-la-nature-du-commerce-en-gener-Richard-Cantillon.pdf/ (data obrashcheniya: 16.02.2020).
Keywords:
investment, capital, David Ricardo, Adam Smith, profit, working capital, fixed capital.
