Analysis of Digital Strategies of the USA and South Korea for the Russian Practice
( Pp. 180-189)

An indispensable condition for the successful strategic development of the national economy in the modern world is its digital transformation (DT). It makes it possible to increase production effectiveness, form new factors of competitiveness, and change seriously the balance of power in particular markets and in the global arena. The search for ways to master these opportunities by means of digital strategies is conducted by the states of all major countries of the world. However, these courses are not always effective to solve the tasks set, even in the known digital leaders, such as the United States and South Korea. Their DT strategies often do not fully consider the conditions that caused them and require adjustments. The determination of such shortcomings and their causes is extremely important for modern Russia, in which the terms of external sanctions and pandemic require the course’ optimization considering the foreign experience. It requires a special analysis of the digital strategies of these countries, this to become the subject of this study, in order to identify their shortcomings and limitations essential to account to implement successfully the Russian digital strategy. The conducted research resulted with the parameters necessary for the success of the digital strategy identification, i.e. its compliance with the socio-economic structure of the country and with the level of innovation activity of national business and its readiness to switch to digital; the attracting of the broad strata of entrepreneurs and other stakeholders to the course’ implementation. The consideration of these circumstances makes it possible to refine significantly Russia's digital strategy and increase its effectiveness in the practice.

Evgenia L.M., Olga M.A., Lyudmila V.O., (2022), ANALYSIS OF DIGITAL STRATEGIES OF THE USA AND SOUTH KOREA FOR THE RUSSIAN PRACTICE. Economic Problems and Legal Practice, 5 => 180-189.

Chakravorti B., Chaturvedi R., Filipovic C., Brewe G. (2020). Digital in the time of covid. Trust in the Digital Economy and Its Evolution Across 90 Economies as the Planet Paused for a Pandemic. The Fletcher School at Tufts University.
Chipidz W., Leidner D. (2019). A review of the ICT-enabled development literature: Towards a power parity theory of ICT4D // The Journal of Strategic Information Systems Volume 28, Issue 2, June 2019, Pp. 145-174.
Guenduez A., Mettler T., Schedler K. (2020). Technological frames in public administration: What do public managers think of big data // Government Information Quarterly, 37(1), Article 101406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.101406.
Kinder, T., Six, F., Stenvall, J., Memon, A. (2020). Governance-as-legitimacy: Are ecosystems replacing networks // Public Management Review, 00(00), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1786149.
KISTEP, (2014) Introduction to Creative Economy The 3rd Science and Technology Basic Plan in Korea.
Luthfi A., Janssen M. (2019). Open data for evidence-based decision-making: Data driven government resulting in uncertainty and polarization. // International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 9(3), 1071-1078. https://doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.9.3.8846.
Mergel I. (2019). Digital service teams in government. // Government Information Quarterly, 36, Article 101389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.07.001.
Mergel, I., Bell e, N., Nasi, G. (2019). Prosocial motivation of private sector IT professionals joining government. // Review of Public Personnel Administration, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X19886058.
Mergel, I., Gong, Y., Bertot, J. (2018). Agile government: Systematic literature review and future research. // Government Information Quarterly, 35(2), 291-298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.04.003.
OECD (2020), Going Digital integrated policy framework , OECD Digital Economy Papers, No. 292, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/dc930adc-en.
Sklyar A., Kowalkowski C., Tronvoll B., S rhammar D. (2019). Organizing for digital servitization: A service ecosystem perspective. // Journal of Business Research, 104, 450-460.
Verhoef P., Broekhuizen T., Bart Y., Bhattacharya A., Qi Dong J., Fabiana N., Haenlein M. (2021). Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda // Journal of Business Research Volume 122, January 2021, Pp. 889-901.
Virkar, S., Edelmann, N., Hynek, N., Parycek, P., Steiner, G., Zenk, L. (2019). Digital transformation in public sector organisations: The role of informal knowledge sharing networks and social media.International Conference on Electronic Participation, 60-72.
Vial G. (2019). Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda // The Journal of Strategic Information Systems Volume 28, Issue 2, June 2019, Pp. 118-144/
Wirtz B., Daiser P. (2018). A meta-analysis of empirical e-government research and its future research implications. // International Review of Administrative Sciences, 84 (1), 144-163/
Zhang J, Zhao W, Cheng B, Li A, Wang Y, Yang N and Tian Y (2022). The Impact of Digital Economy on the Economic Growth and the Development Strategies in the post-COVID-19 Era // Front. Public Health, 2022, vol.10, art. 856142.

digital strategy, digital technologies, digital transformation, digital leaders countries, indicators of digital transformation, innovative activity.