Weak Subject of Family Relations: A Comparative Legal Study
( Pp. 128-132)
Abstract:
The purpose of the research. The effect of the principle of protection of a weak subject in family legal relations is analyzed. The study was conducted by comparing the family legislation of the Republic of Chile and the Russian Federation. This choice is conditioned by the direct consolidation in the Chilean family legislation of the principle of protection of a weak spouse. Results. It is concluded that it is impossible to borrow institutions for the protection of a weak spouse into the legal system of Russia. Putting forward the hypothesis of a possible identification of the weak position of women in Russian family legal relations by gender, the author comes to its refutation. The author substantiates the identification of a psychophysiological sign of a weak subject of a private law relationship.
How to Cite:
Gulyaeva O.N., (2022), WEAK SUBJECT OF FAMILY RELATIONS: A COMPARATIVE LEGAL STUDY. Economic Problems and Legal Practice, 5 => 128-132.
Reference list:
Bryukhina E.R., Tretyakova E.S. Women's rights in the context of universal, regional and national (Russian) standards and mechanisms for the protection of human rights // Bulletin of the Perm University of Law. 2021. №. 3. Pp. 516-539.
Volos A.A. Weak side of the marriage contract // Notary. 2018. №. 4. Pp. 26-29.
Kalachikova O.N., Gruzdeva M.A. Gender stereotypes in the modern family: women and men (based on sociological research) // Woman in Russian society. 2019. №. 1. Pp. 64-76.
Krasheninnikov P., Mikheeva L., Rasskazova N., Petrov E., Arkhipov D., Fedorova O., Aleinikova V., Dergunova V. Reform of the matrimonial property regime // Law. 2019. №. 12. Pp. 20-32.
Kuznetsova O.A. Norms-principles of Russian civil law. M.: Statut, 2006. 269 p.
Pyankova A.F. Prospects for the legal regulation of property relations of spouses // Ex jure. 2020. №. 4. Pp. 106-121.
Shablinsky I.G. Post-Authoritarian Development and Resolution of Constitutional and Political Crises: Paraguay and Chile // Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law. 2022. №. 2. Pp. 13-23.
guila R.D. La compensaci n econ mica en la nueva legislaci n de matrimonio civil // REVISTA ACTUALIDAD JURIDICA. 2007. № 15. P. 83-93.
Cox L. Divorcio en Chile. Un an lisis preliminar tras la nueva Ley de Matrimonio Civil // Estudios P blicos. 2011. № 123. P. 95-187.
Dickfos J., Brown C., Bettles J. Superannuation and Bankruptcy: Is There a Mid-Life Crisis Looming // QUT Law Review. № 17. 2017. P. 114-126.
Heinze C.; Steinrotter B. Procedural Position of a Weaker Party in the Regulation Brussels Ibis // BRUSSELS IBIS REGULATION: CHANGES AND CHALLENGES OF THE RENEWED PROCEDURAL SCHEME. 2017. P. 51-70.
Molina C.L. The principle of protection of the weaker spouse in modern family law // REVISTA CHILENA DE DERECHO. 2013. № 2. P. 513-548.
Whittaker S. Unfair Terms in Commercial Contracts and the Two Laws of Competition: French Law and English Law Contrasted // Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. № 39. 2019. P. 404-434.
Volos A.A. Weak side of the marriage contract // Notary. 2018. №. 4. Pp. 26-29.
Kalachikova O.N., Gruzdeva M.A. Gender stereotypes in the modern family: women and men (based on sociological research) // Woman in Russian society. 2019. №. 1. Pp. 64-76.
Krasheninnikov P., Mikheeva L., Rasskazova N., Petrov E., Arkhipov D., Fedorova O., Aleinikova V., Dergunova V. Reform of the matrimonial property regime // Law. 2019. №. 12. Pp. 20-32.
Kuznetsova O.A. Norms-principles of Russian civil law. M.: Statut, 2006. 269 p.
Pyankova A.F. Prospects for the legal regulation of property relations of spouses // Ex jure. 2020. №. 4. Pp. 106-121.
Shablinsky I.G. Post-Authoritarian Development and Resolution of Constitutional and Political Crises: Paraguay and Chile // Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law. 2022. №. 2. Pp. 13-23.
guila R.D. La compensaci n econ mica en la nueva legislaci n de matrimonio civil // REVISTA ACTUALIDAD JURIDICA. 2007. № 15. P. 83-93.
Cox L. Divorcio en Chile. Un an lisis preliminar tras la nueva Ley de Matrimonio Civil // Estudios P blicos. 2011. № 123. P. 95-187.
Dickfos J., Brown C., Bettles J. Superannuation and Bankruptcy: Is There a Mid-Life Crisis Looming // QUT Law Review. № 17. 2017. P. 114-126.
Heinze C.; Steinrotter B. Procedural Position of a Weaker Party in the Regulation Brussels Ibis // BRUSSELS IBIS REGULATION: CHANGES AND CHALLENGES OF THE RENEWED PROCEDURAL SCHEME. 2017. P. 51-70.
Molina C.L. The principle of protection of the weaker spouse in modern family law // REVISTA CHILENA DE DERECHO. 2013. № 2. P. 513-548.
Whittaker S. Unfair Terms in Commercial Contracts and the Two Laws of Competition: French Law and English Law Contrasted // Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. № 39. 2019. P. 404-434.
Keywords:
weak subject, weak side, legal status of a woman, sign of a weak subject, principle of equality, principle of protection of a weak subject.
Related Articles
