Participation in Procedural Actions through Video Conferencing: Problems and Solutions, Prospects
( Pp. 279-282)

Informatization and digitalization affected all spheres of public life, and the area of criminal pre-trial proceedings was no exception. In January 2022, amendments to the criminal procedure legislation came into force, providing for the right of an investigator (inquirer) to conduct separate investigative actions (interrogation, confrontation, presentation for identification) via video conferencing. Considering that at the stage of the trial of a criminal case, the use of such remote technology during interrogation has already received its positive experience, the features of its use at the stage of preliminary investigation require theoretical understanding. The article gives a general description of the use of video conferencing in the implementation of procedural actions, highlights the advantages and disadvantages of using this remote technology. The analysis of the features of using the video conferencing system during individual investigative actions allowed the authors to identify certain problematic aspects due to the imperfection of regulatory regulation, insufficient material equipment of law enforcement agencies, information security, and some others, and also suggested possible solutions to the identified problems. The conclusion is made about the possible prospects for the development of the use of a video conferencing system during investigative actions.

Zaurbi L.S., Natalia G.K., (2022), PARTICIPATION IN PROCEDURAL ACTIONS THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING: PROBLEMS AND SOLUTIONS, PROSPECTS. Economic Problems and Legal Practice, 3 => 279-282.

Anufrieva E.A. Conducting interrogation, confrontation, identification using videoconferencing systems at the stage of preliminary investigation // Criminal proceedings: procedural theory and forensic practice. Materials X Int. scientific-practical. conf. Rep. editor M.A. Mikhailov. Simferopol, 2022.
Arkhipova E.A. The use of video conferencing in criminal proceedings in Russia and foreign countries (comparative legal research): dis. … cand. legal Sciences. M., 2013.
Dashkin A.V. The use of videoconferencing systems in criminal proceedings // Young scientist. 2018. No. 24 (210).
Zheltobryukhov S.P. On the need to provide the body of preliminary investigation with the possibility of using videoconferencing at the stage of pre-trial proceedings // Russian Justice. 2016. No. 1.
Kruzhilin N.P. Analysis of some aspects of the practice of interrogation and confrontation by video-conferencing (on the example of certain foreign states) // Law and power. 2022. No. 1.
Kurochkina Yu.S. Problems of carrying out judicial actions of an investigative nature with the use of videoconferencing // Bulletin of the Kostroma State University. 2018. Vol. 24. No. 2.
Martynov A.N., Kravets E.G., Shuvalov N.V. Organizational and tactical module of remote investigative actions // Criminological problems of law enforcement: works of the Academy of Management of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2017. No. 4 (44).
Ovchinnikova O.V. Remote investigative actions: current state and prospects // Legal science and law enforcement practice. 2019. No. 1 (47).
Plahota K.S. Features of the production of interrogation through the use of videoconferencing // Collection of materials of forensic readings. 2021. No. 18.
Shcherba S.P., Arkhipova E.A. The use of video conferencing in criminal proceedings in Russia and foreign countries: experience, problems, prospects: monograph. M., 2016.

video conferencing, investigative actions, security, Internet, protocol, interrogation, confrontation, identification.