ADVERSARIAL OF PRETRAIL PROCEEDINDS IN THE DOCTRINAL MODEL OF THE LAW OF EVIDENCE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION
( Pp. 183-186)
More about authors
Alexey P. Popov
Dr. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Professor of the Departments of Criminal Law disciplines and Judicial Expert Activities at the Institute of Jurisprudence and Engineering
Pyatigorsky State University
Pyatigorsk, Russian Federation Zinchenko Igor Anatolyevich kand. yurid. nauk, docent, docent kafedry gosudarstvenno-pravovyh disciplin
Moscow International University, Kaliningrad branch
Pyatigorsky State University
Pyatigorsk, Russian Federation Zinchenko Igor Anatolyevich kand. yurid. nauk, docent, docent kafedry gosudarstvenno-pravovyh disciplin
Moscow International University, Kaliningrad branch
Abstract:
Published in April 2015 Doctrinal model of criminal procedure of the Russian Federation of evidence law, prepared by a group of authors under the direction of prof. A.S. Alexandrov, caused ambiguous reaction among scientists and emloyees of criminal justice. Discussed were: its general characteristics, inclusion at it the institute of the investigating judge and a number of other problems. In this article-dialog, our authors are turning to issues related to development in the Doctrinal models of arms began pre-trial proceedings.
How to Cite:
Alexey P.P., Zinchenko I.A., (2016), ADVERSARIAL OF PRETRAIL PROCEEDINDS IN THE DOCTRINAL MODEL OF THE LAW OF EVIDENCE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 7 => 183-186.
Reference list:
Bykov V.M. Sledovatel v ugolovnom protsesse Rossii. M.: YUrlitinform, 2014.
Grigor ev V.N., Zinchenko I.A., Popov A.P. Komparativistskie zametki ob institute sledstvennogo sud i v dosudebnom ugolovnom proizvodstve // Mezhdunarodnoe ugolovnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnaya yustitsiya. 2016. № 1. S. 13 - 19.
Doktrinal naya model ugolovno-protsessual nogo dokazatel stvennogo prava Rossiyskoy Federatsii i kommentarii k ney / pod red. A.S. Aleksandrova. M.: YUrlitinform, 2015.
Zinchenko I.A., Popov A.A. Struktura ugolovno-protsessual nogo instituta deponirovaniya pokazaniy, tsel i osnovaniya ego primeneniya // Biblioteka kriminalista. Nauchnyy zhurnal. 2015. № 1 (18). S. 301 - 308.
Zinchenko I.A., Popova I.A. Integratsiya rozysknykh nachal v ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo (komparativistskiy vzglyad) // Biblioteka kriminalista. Nauchnyy zhurnal. 2013. № 4 (9). S. 19 - 29.
Popov A.A. Problemy reglamentatsii dosudebnogo deponirovaniya pokazaniy v ugolovnom protsesse // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2014. № 6. S. 196 - 200.
Popov A.P. Operativno-rozysknaya initsiatsiya ugolovno-protsessual noy deyatel nosti // Professional. 1998. № 5-6. S. 34 - 38.
Popov A.P. Ugolovnyy protsess Rossii: tselepolaganie, sistema zadach i sredstva. Pyatigorsk: RIA na KMV, 2016.
Popov A.P. TSelepolaganie v sovremennom otechestvennom ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve: avtoref. dis. dokt. yurid. nauk. N. Novgorod, 2006.
Popov A.P., Popova I.A., Zinchenko I.A. Ugolovnyy protsess: problemy dokazatel stvennogo prava sovremennoy Rossii. Pyatigorsk: RIA na KMV, 2014.
Rozovskiy B.G., Zinchenko I.A. K diskussii o Doktrinal noy modeli ugolovno-protsessual nogo dokazatel stvennogo prava // Elektronnyy zhurnal. URL: http://www.iuaj.net/taxonomy/term/11
Rossinskiy S.B. Metodologicheskie problemy dokazyvaniya v sostyazatel nom ugolovnom protsesse // Biblioteka kriminalista. Nauchnyy zhurnal. 2016. № 1 (24). S. 79 - 92.
Grigor ev V.N., Zinchenko I.A., Popov A.P. Komparativistskie zametki ob institute sledstvennogo sud i v dosudebnom ugolovnom proizvodstve // Mezhdunarodnoe ugolovnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnaya yustitsiya. 2016. № 1. S. 13 - 19.
Doktrinal naya model ugolovno-protsessual nogo dokazatel stvennogo prava Rossiyskoy Federatsii i kommentarii k ney / pod red. A.S. Aleksandrova. M.: YUrlitinform, 2015.
Zinchenko I.A., Popov A.A. Struktura ugolovno-protsessual nogo instituta deponirovaniya pokazaniy, tsel i osnovaniya ego primeneniya // Biblioteka kriminalista. Nauchnyy zhurnal. 2015. № 1 (18). S. 301 - 308.
Zinchenko I.A., Popova I.A. Integratsiya rozysknykh nachal v ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo (komparativistskiy vzglyad) // Biblioteka kriminalista. Nauchnyy zhurnal. 2013. № 4 (9). S. 19 - 29.
Popov A.A. Problemy reglamentatsii dosudebnogo deponirovaniya pokazaniy v ugolovnom protsesse // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2014. № 6. S. 196 - 200.
Popov A.P. Operativno-rozysknaya initsiatsiya ugolovno-protsessual noy deyatel nosti // Professional. 1998. № 5-6. S. 34 - 38.
Popov A.P. Ugolovnyy protsess Rossii: tselepolaganie, sistema zadach i sredstva. Pyatigorsk: RIA na KMV, 2016.
Popov A.P. TSelepolaganie v sovremennom otechestvennom ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve: avtoref. dis. dokt. yurid. nauk. N. Novgorod, 2006.
Popov A.P., Popova I.A., Zinchenko I.A. Ugolovnyy protsess: problemy dokazatel stvennogo prava sovremennoy Rossii. Pyatigorsk: RIA na KMV, 2014.
Rozovskiy B.G., Zinchenko I.A. K diskussii o Doktrinal noy modeli ugolovno-protsessual nogo dokazatel stvennogo prava // Elektronnyy zhurnal. URL: http://www.iuaj.net/taxonomy/term/11
Rossinskiy S.B. Metodologicheskie problemy dokazyvaniya v sostyazatel nom ugolovnom protsesse // Biblioteka kriminalista. Nauchnyy zhurnal. 2016. № 1 (24). S. 79 - 92.
Keywords:
theory of evidence, law of evidence, competition, doctrinal model of the law of evidence.
