THE IMPACT OF INTERNATIONALLY MANDATORY RULES ON THE ENFORCEABILITY OF ARBITRATION AGREEMENTS AND CHOICE-OF-COURT AGREEMENTS
( Pp. 103-106)
More about authors
Zasemkova Olesia Fedorovna
spirant. Mesto ucheby: Moskovskiy gosudarstvennyy yuridicheskiy universitet imeni O.E. Kutafina (MGYuA). Podrazdelenie: kafedra mezhdunarodnogo chastnogo prava. Dolzhnost: assistent. Mesto raboty: Moskovskiy gosudarstvennyy yuridicheskiy universitet imeni O.E. Kutafina (MGYuA). Podrazdelenie: Centr mezhdunarodnyh pravovyh konkursov
Moscow State Law University named after O.E.Kutafin (MSLA)
Moscow State Law University named after O.E.Kutafin (MSLA)
Abstract:
Problem: The article is devoted to the problem of the impact of internationally mandatory rules on the enforceability of arbitration agreements and choice-of-court agreements. Novelty and actuality of this problem caused the preparation of this article. Upon investigating the issue the writings of the following authors have been studied: A.I. Belohlavek, P. Mankowski, G. Rühl, K. Thorn etc. Model: The present article is dedicated to the examination of the main methods of resolving the issues of the impact of internationally mandatory rules on the enforceability of arbitration agreements and choice-of-court agreements. Conclusion: The author makes conclusion on the necessity of the differentiation of the questions of the jurisdiction and applicable law.
How to Cite:
Zasemkova O.F., (2016), THE IMPACT OF INTERNATIONALLY MANDATORY RULES ON THE ENFORCEABILITY OF ARBITRATION AGREEMENTS AND CHOICE-OF-COURT AGREEMENTS. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 7 => 103-106.
Reference list:
Zasemkova O.F. K voprosu o ponyatii i priznakakh sverkhimperativnykh norm mezhdunarodnogo chastnogo prava // Biznes v zakone. 2016. № 4. S. 86-91.
Zasemkova O.F. K voprosu o nekotorykh problemakh, svyazannykh s primeneniem sverkhimperativnykh norm tret ikh stran // Biznes v zakone. 2014. № 2. S. 156-158.
Karabel nikov B.R. Ispolnenie i osparivanie resheniy mezhdunarodnykh kommercheskikh arbitrazhey. Kommentariy k N yu-Yorkskoy konventsii 1958 g. i glavam 30 i 31 APK RF 2002 g. 3-e izd., pererab. i dop. M.: Statut, 2008.
CHuprunov I.S. Arbitrabel nost : primenimoe pravo i vliyanie so storony sverkhimperativnykh norm // Novye gorizonty mezhdunarodnogo arbitrazha. Vyp.1: sb.st. / pod red. A.V. Asoskova, N.G. Vilkovoy, R.M. KHodykina. M.: Infotropik Media, 2013.
Antomo J. German Supreme Court Strikes Down Choice of Court Agreements Prorogating Courts of Virginia. Electronic resource . URL: http://blogs.law.nyu.edu/transnational/category/conflict-of-laws / (data obrashcheniya: 10.09.2015).
BGH. 05.09.2012. VII ZR 25/12. Elecronic resource . URL: http://juris.bundesgerichtshof.de/cgi-bin/rechtspre-chung/document.py Gericht bgh Art en az VII 20ZR 2025/12 nr 61762 / (data obrashcheniya: 10.09.2015).
Cour de Cassation. 22.10.2008. № 07-15.823. Privoditsya po: Beloglavek A.I. Evropeyskoe mezhdunarodnoe chastnoe pravo - dogovornye svyazi i obyazatel stva. T. 2. Kiev, 2010.
Corte di cassazione. 20.02.2007. № 3841. Privoditsya po: Basedow J. Exclusive Choice-of-Court Agreements as a Derogation from Imperative Norms // Max Planck Private Law Research Paper. № 14/1.
Ingmar GB Ltd. v. Eaton Leonard Technologies Inc. Case C-381/98. Electronic resource . URL: http://www.eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/ uri CELEX 3A61998CJ0381 / (data obrashcheniya: 30.06.2016).
Mankowski P. Commercial Agents under European Jurisdiction Rules. The Brussels I Regulation Plus the Procedural Consequences of Ingmar // Yearbook of Private International Law. 2008. Volume X.
Monster Cable Product Productions Inc. v. Audio Marketing Electronic resource . URL: http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx g fb907dd1-1dc-a2f7-928 344do6898 / (data obrashcheniya: 30.12.2015).
OLG Munchen. 05.12.2005. Privoditsya po: Kleinheisterkamp J. The Impact of Internationally Mandatory Laws on the Enforceability of Arbitration Agreements // World Arbitration Mediation Review. 2009. Volume 3. № 2. P. 90-120.
OLG Munchen. 17.05.2006. 7U 1781/06. Electronic resource . URL: http://blogs.law.nyu.edu/transnational/ 2013/04/german-supreme-court-strikes-down-choice-of-court-agreement-prorogating-courts-of-virginia / (data obrashcheniya: 10.05.2015).
The Hollandia. House of Lords, 1982 // Kunda I. Internationally Mandatory Rules of a Third Country in the European Contract Conflict of Laws. Rijeka, 2007.
Thorn K., Grenz W. The Effect of Overriding Mandatory Rules on the Arbitration Agreement // Ferrari F., Kroll S. Conflict of Laws in International Arbitration. Sellier Publishing, 2010.
Ruhl G. Die Wirksamkeit von Gerichtsstands- und Schiedvereinbarungen im Lichte der Ingmar-Entscheidung des EuGH (zu Oberlandesgericht Munchen. 17.05.2006 - 7U 1781/06) // Praxis des Internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts. 2007.
Van Hopplynus Instruments S.A. v. Coherent Inc. 16.11.2006 // Revue Belge de Droit Commercial. 2007. № 3.
X AS/TU v. Motorola Corporation. № 4R 198/2005. Privoditsya po: Beloglavek A.I. Evropeyskoe mezhdunarodnoe chastnoe pravo - dogovornye svyazi i obyazatel stva. T. 2. Kiev, 2010.
Zasemkova O.F. K voprosu o nekotorykh problemakh, svyazannykh s primeneniem sverkhimperativnykh norm tret ikh stran // Biznes v zakone. 2014. № 2. S. 156-158.
Karabel nikov B.R. Ispolnenie i osparivanie resheniy mezhdunarodnykh kommercheskikh arbitrazhey. Kommentariy k N yu-Yorkskoy konventsii 1958 g. i glavam 30 i 31 APK RF 2002 g. 3-e izd., pererab. i dop. M.: Statut, 2008.
CHuprunov I.S. Arbitrabel nost : primenimoe pravo i vliyanie so storony sverkhimperativnykh norm // Novye gorizonty mezhdunarodnogo arbitrazha. Vyp.1: sb.st. / pod red. A.V. Asoskova, N.G. Vilkovoy, R.M. KHodykina. M.: Infotropik Media, 2013.
Antomo J. German Supreme Court Strikes Down Choice of Court Agreements Prorogating Courts of Virginia. Electronic resource . URL: http://blogs.law.nyu.edu/transnational/category/conflict-of-laws / (data obrashcheniya: 10.09.2015).
BGH. 05.09.2012. VII ZR 25/12. Elecronic resource . URL: http://juris.bundesgerichtshof.de/cgi-bin/rechtspre-chung/document.py Gericht bgh Art en az VII 20ZR 2025/12 nr 61762 / (data obrashcheniya: 10.09.2015).
Cour de Cassation. 22.10.2008. № 07-15.823. Privoditsya po: Beloglavek A.I. Evropeyskoe mezhdunarodnoe chastnoe pravo - dogovornye svyazi i obyazatel stva. T. 2. Kiev, 2010.
Corte di cassazione. 20.02.2007. № 3841. Privoditsya po: Basedow J. Exclusive Choice-of-Court Agreements as a Derogation from Imperative Norms // Max Planck Private Law Research Paper. № 14/1.
Ingmar GB Ltd. v. Eaton Leonard Technologies Inc. Case C-381/98. Electronic resource . URL: http://www.eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/ uri CELEX 3A61998CJ0381 / (data obrashcheniya: 30.06.2016).
Mankowski P. Commercial Agents under European Jurisdiction Rules. The Brussels I Regulation Plus the Procedural Consequences of Ingmar // Yearbook of Private International Law. 2008. Volume X.
Monster Cable Product Productions Inc. v. Audio Marketing Electronic resource . URL: http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx g fb907dd1-1dc-a2f7-928 344do6898 / (data obrashcheniya: 30.12.2015).
OLG Munchen. 05.12.2005. Privoditsya po: Kleinheisterkamp J. The Impact of Internationally Mandatory Laws on the Enforceability of Arbitration Agreements // World Arbitration Mediation Review. 2009. Volume 3. № 2. P. 90-120.
OLG Munchen. 17.05.2006. 7U 1781/06. Electronic resource . URL: http://blogs.law.nyu.edu/transnational/ 2013/04/german-supreme-court-strikes-down-choice-of-court-agreement-prorogating-courts-of-virginia / (data obrashcheniya: 10.05.2015).
The Hollandia. House of Lords, 1982 // Kunda I. Internationally Mandatory Rules of a Third Country in the European Contract Conflict of Laws. Rijeka, 2007.
Thorn K., Grenz W. The Effect of Overriding Mandatory Rules on the Arbitration Agreement // Ferrari F., Kroll S. Conflict of Laws in International Arbitration. Sellier Publishing, 2010.
Ruhl G. Die Wirksamkeit von Gerichtsstands- und Schiedvereinbarungen im Lichte der Ingmar-Entscheidung des EuGH (zu Oberlandesgericht Munchen. 17.05.2006 - 7U 1781/06) // Praxis des Internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts. 2007.
Van Hopplynus Instruments S.A. v. Coherent Inc. 16.11.2006 // Revue Belge de Droit Commercial. 2007. № 3.
X AS/TU v. Motorola Corporation. № 4R 198/2005. Privoditsya po: Beloglavek A.I. Evropeyskoe mezhdunarodnoe chastnoe pravo - dogovornye svyazi i obyazatel stva. T. 2. Kiev, 2010.
Keywords:
the mandatory rules, the arbitration agreement, prorogation agreement.
