It is a legal right to disagree with a public prosecutor
( Pp. 190-192)
More about authors
Rykova Olesya Anatolievna
Dolzhnost: mirovoy sudya.
court plot № 2 of the Soviet district of Orel
court plot № 2 of the Soviet district of Orel
Abstract:
The Russian criminal procedure law provides for an appeal against the judicial decree about dismissal of a criminal case because of a public prosecutor’s dropped charge to a higher authority, but it doesn’t provide for a power (commission) of a court of the first instance to pass on a different judgment, if it doesn’t agree with the public prosecutor. Such statutory provision forces the court of the first instance to accept unconditionally the public prosecutor’s dropped charge independently of its sufficiency in law, and compel it to adjudicate an unlawful act if the public prosecutor’s dropped charge is also unlawful. In the article a necessity to vest the court with authorities to take the prosecutor’s dropped charge or to dismiss to take it is legal justified of an analysis of the operative rules, which regulates a appellate procedure against judicial acts.
How to Cite:
Rykova O.A., (2014), IT IS A LEGAL RIGHT TO DISAGREE WITH A PUBLIC PROSECUTOR. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 6 => 190-192.
Reference list:
Agutin A.V., Firsova K.V. K voprosu o napravleniyakh obespecheniya prokurorom zakonnykh interesov poterpevshego ot prestupleniya.// Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2009. № 1. S. 234-238.
Andreyanov V.A. Protsessual nye aspekty otkaza ot obvineniya i izmeneniya obvineniya gosudarstvennym obvinitelem // Rossiyskiy sud ya. 2008. № 2.
Demidov V. Obespechit polozhenie poterpevshego real nymi pravami // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2003. № 11. S.20.
Gataullin Z. SH. Podgotovka i osushchestvlenie gosudarstvennogo obvineniya v sude: Avtoreferat dissertatsii na soiskanie uchenoy stepeni kandidata yuridicheskikh nauk. Spetsial nost 12.00.09 -Ugolovnyy protsess; Kriminalistika i sudebnaya ekspertiza; Operativno-rozysknaya deyatel nost /Z. SH. Gataullin; Nauch. ruk. V. P. Malkov. - Samara, 2007. - s. 7.
ZHumakanova M.A. K voprosu ob osnovaniyakh otkaza gosudarstvennogo obvinitelya ot obvineniya // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2013. № 6. S. 242-245.
Kolpashnikova V.M. Teoreticheskie i prakticheskie voprosy uchastiya gosudarstvennogo obvinitelya v sude pervoy instantsii: Avtoreferat dissertatsii na soiskanie uchenoy stepeni kandidata yuridicheskikh nauk. 12.00.09 - Ugolovnyy protsess ; Kriminalistika i sudebnaya ekspertiza ; Operativno-rozysknaya deyatel nost /V. M. Kolpashnikova ; Nauch. ruk. S. M. Darovskikh. -CHelyabinsk, 2006. S. 7.
Korolyev G.N. Problemy pravovogo regulirovaniya otkaza gosudarstvennogo obvinitelya ot podderzhaniya obvineniya// Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2012. № 2. S. 174-179.
Savitskiy V.M. Protsessual nye posledstviya otkaza prokurora ot obvineniya // Pravovedenie. 1972. №1.
YAkovlev N.M. Ogranichenie prav poterpevshikh na svobodnyy dostup k pravosudiyu// ZHurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2005. № 5. S. 16.
Andreyanov V.A. Protsessual nye aspekty otkaza ot obvineniya i izmeneniya obvineniya gosudarstvennym obvinitelem // Rossiyskiy sud ya. 2008. № 2.
Demidov V. Obespechit polozhenie poterpevshego real nymi pravami // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2003. № 11. S.20.
Gataullin Z. SH. Podgotovka i osushchestvlenie gosudarstvennogo obvineniya v sude: Avtoreferat dissertatsii na soiskanie uchenoy stepeni kandidata yuridicheskikh nauk. Spetsial nost 12.00.09 -Ugolovnyy protsess; Kriminalistika i sudebnaya ekspertiza; Operativno-rozysknaya deyatel nost /Z. SH. Gataullin; Nauch. ruk. V. P. Malkov. - Samara, 2007. - s. 7.
ZHumakanova M.A. K voprosu ob osnovaniyakh otkaza gosudarstvennogo obvinitelya ot obvineniya // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2013. № 6. S. 242-245.
Kolpashnikova V.M. Teoreticheskie i prakticheskie voprosy uchastiya gosudarstvennogo obvinitelya v sude pervoy instantsii: Avtoreferat dissertatsii na soiskanie uchenoy stepeni kandidata yuridicheskikh nauk. 12.00.09 - Ugolovnyy protsess ; Kriminalistika i sudebnaya ekspertiza ; Operativno-rozysknaya deyatel nost /V. M. Kolpashnikova ; Nauch. ruk. S. M. Darovskikh. -CHelyabinsk, 2006. S. 7.
Korolyev G.N. Problemy pravovogo regulirovaniya otkaza gosudarstvennogo obvinitelya ot podderzhaniya obvineniya// Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2012. № 2. S. 174-179.
Savitskiy V.M. Protsessual nye posledstviya otkaza prokurora ot obvineniya // Pravovedenie. 1972. №1.
YAkovlev N.M. Ogranichenie prav poterpevshikh na svobodnyy dostup k pravosudiyu// ZHurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2005. № 5. S. 16.
Keywords:
a declination of prosecution, the legality, the validity, the acceptance of declination of prosecution by the court, termination of criminal proceedings, appeal against judicial acts.
