PECULIARITIES OF ESTABLISHING CAUSAL CONNECTION ON CASES ON VIOLATION OF RULES OF ROAD TRAFFIC AND EXPLOITATION OF MEANS OF TRANSPORT
( Pp. 228-231)

More about authors
Alexander A. Cheburenkov Associate Professor of the Department of Criminal Law and Process of the Law Institute, National Research Mordovian State University of N.P. Ogaryov
National Research Ogarev Mordovia State University
Saransk, Russian Federation Korovin Dmitry Gennadievich magistrant. Podrazdelenie: kafedra ugolovnogo prava, kriminalistiki i kriminologii
National Research Mordovian state University named after N.P. Ogarev
Abstract:
Objectives: The problems of establishing causal connection in road traffic crimes are continue to be actual for the theory and practice of criminal law, which necessitates a deeper and more systemic investigation of them in order to provide law enforce bodies with appropriate scientific recommendations. Methods: In preparing the article, dialectical, formal-legal, logical methods were applied, as well as methods of systemic and comparative analysis. Conclusions: The article reveals the legal significance and peculiarities of the causal connection in cases of violation of traffic rules and on this basis the ways of preventing and eliminating possible mistakes in solving this issue in law enforcement practice are indicated. Meaning: The accounted provisions can be used in judicial practice (in the qualification of road traffic crimes), as well as in scientific research on problems of causality in criminal law.
How to Cite:
Alexander A.C., Korovin D.G., (2017), PECULIARITIES OF ESTABLISHING CAUSAL CONNECTION ON CASES ON VIOLATION OF RULES OF ROAD TRAFFIC AND EXPLOITATION OF MEANS OF TRANSPORT. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 6 => 228-231.
Reference list:
O sudebnoy praktike po delam o prestupleniyakh, svyazannykh s narusheniem pravil dorozhnogo dvizheniya i ekspluatatsii transportnykh sredstv, a takzhe s ikh nepravomernym zavladeniem bez tseli khishcheniya: postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 9 dekabrya 2008 g. №25 (s izm. i dop., vnesennymi postanovleniyami Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 23 dekabrya 2010 g. №31, ot 24 maya 2016 g. №22) // Byulleten Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 2009. №2. S. 2-7; Rossiyskaya gazeta. 2016. 1 iyunya.
Dagel P. S. Prichinnaya svyaz v prestupleniyakh, sovershaemykh po neostorozhnosti // Voprosy bor by s prestupnost yu. Vyp. 34. M.: YUrid. lit., 1981. S. 28-38.
Dorozhno-transportnaya prestupnost : zakonomernosti, prichiny, sotsial nyy kontrol / A. YU. Kravtsov, A. I. Sirokhin, R. V. Skomorokhov, V. N. SHikhanov; pod red. V. V. Luneeva. SPb.: YUrid. tsentr Press, 2011. 474 s.
Kozachenko I., Kurchenko V. Kak ustanovit prichinnuyu svyaz // Sotsialisticheskaya zakonnost . 1991. №4. S. 40-42.
Korobeev A. I. Transportnye prestupleniya i transportnaya prestupnost . M.: YUrlitinform, 2015. 488 s.
Kurinov B. A. Avtotransportnye prestupleniya. Kvalifikatsiya i otvetstvennost . Izd. 2-e, pererab. M.: YUrid. lit., 1976. 208 s.
Malinin V. B. Prichinnaya svyaz v ugolovnom prave. SPb.: YUrid. tsentr Press, 2000. 315 s.
Entsiklopediya ugolovnogo prava. T. 24. Prestupleniya protiv bezopasnosti i ekspluatatsii transporta / otv. red. V. B. Malinin. SPb.: Izd. prof. Malinina - MIEP pri MPA EvrAzES, 2014. 690 s.
Byulleten Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 2002. №7. S. 17.
Keywords:
the traffic violation, a causal relationship, the reason, criminal consequences, the mechanism of a traffic accident, technical expertise.