On Issues of Legal Regulation of Provisional Custody (Guardianship) of Minors in Russian Federation
( Pp. 58-63)

Aims: The article focuses on the problem of incapability of parents (single parent), due to various circumstances, to perform responsibilities and rights, assigned to them by the law. It is an attempt to study the new law (amendment to Federal law) Federal Law No. 48-FZ of April 24, 2008 «On Guardianship and Custodianship», which stated institution of provisional custody (custodianship). This amendment is not in-demand, the institution under consideration is young, and, consequently, not enough approved by practice. Despite seeming irreproachability of the amendment, it still has some disadvantages in terms of legal regulation. This article is devoted to the issues of the institution of provisional (fixed, voluntary) custody (guardianship). Model: The methodological basis of the research is a general scientific dialectical method, which involves an objective and comprehensive knowledge of the phenomena under analysis, beside that formal-logical and system methods were used. Conclusions: Basing on the analysis of law enforcement practice, the authors made a number of conclusions. Firstly, this amendment is not enough in-demand due to distorted interpretation of its essence. Secondly, extend of rights and responsibilities of the provisional guardian is not stated clearly in the articles of the Law. Thirdly, the Guardianship Law does not contain approximate list of justifiable reasons necessary to establish provisional guardianship. Finally, the issue of period of guardianship of minors, as well as some other problems of the institution are considered in the article. In connection therewith the authors, in particular make proposal on possible improvement of the Law by introduction of legal response of ability to transfer rights of justified representation be means of mutual agreement executed by parents of the minor to transfer the rights for justified representation of the child to the third party for a short term absence of the parents (under one month). Scope of the research: The authors made attempt to study amendment to Federal Law No. 48-FZ of April 24, 2008 «On Guardianship and Custodianship», as well as norms of Family Code of the Russian Federation No. 223- FZ of December 12, 1995, and views upon the institution that exist in scientific practice. Practical importance: Legal finalization of terms of temporary guardianship over minors by third party shall enable guarantee of protection of their rights and legitimate interests in case of temporary absence of parents (single parent). Consequently, systematic circumspect reforming of legal framework of provisional (fixed, voluntary) custody (guardianship) of minors in the RF will positively affect potential of the institution and increase its demand in law enforcement practice. Importance: The stated research shows a specific approach to problem. Possibly, there are some opponents from either theorists and practitioners, basing on the probability of minor harm. Also, it is need to be said that leaving a child with third party with no legal support may cause much more problems and risks. Thereupon, the legal guardianship simplification will increase the attractiveness of provisional (fixed, voluntary) custody (guardianship) and provide effective secure of minor’s rights in Russian Federation.

Bryukhina E.R., Kozlova V.S., (2014), ON ISSUES OF LEGAL REGULATION OF PROVISIONAL CUSTODY (GUARDIANSHIP) OF MINORS IN RUSSIAN FEDERATION. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 6 => 58-63.

Semeynyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 29.12.1995 N 223-FZ (red. ot 05.05.2014) // Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF. 01.01.1996. N 1. st. 16.
Ugolovnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 13.06.1996 N 63-FZ (red. ot 21.07.2014) // Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF. 17.06.1996. N 25. st. 2954.
Kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh ot 30.12.2001 N 195-FZ (red. ot 21.07.2014) // quot;Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF quot;, 07.01.2002, N 1 (ch. 1), st. 1.
Federal nyy zakon O poryadke vyezda iz Rossiyskoy Federatsii i v ezda v Rossiyskuyu Federatsiyu ot 15.08.1996 N 114-FZ (red. ot 20.04.2014) // Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF. 19.08.1996. N 34. st. 4029.
Federal nyy zakon Ob opeke i popechitel stve ot 24.04.2008 (red. ot 05.05.2014) // Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF. 28.04.2008. N 17. st. 1755.
Zaklyuchenie Komiteta po delam zhenshchin, sem i i detey ot 25.05.2007 N 3.6-13/726 quot;Na proekt Federal nogo zakona N 184675-4 quot;Ob opeke i popechitel stve quot; // SPS Konsul tantPlyus
Postateynyy kommentariy k Semeynomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii i Federal nomu zakonu quot;Ob opeke i popechitel stve quot; / V. V. Andropov, N. G. Valeeva, E. S. Getman i dr.; Pod red. P. V.Krasheninnikova. - 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. - M. :Statut, 2010 // SPS Konsul tantPlyus
Fetisova O.V. Vidy i formy opeki (popechitel stva) // Pravo i politika. 2009. S. 1304-1310 / SPS Konsul tantPlyus
Il ina O.YU. Interesy rebenka v sovremennom prave Rossiyskoy Federatsii. M.: Gorodets, 2006. elektronnyy resurs // Seychas.ru. Biznes i vlast .URL: http://www.lawmix.ru/commlaw/1367 (data obrashcheniya: 28.12.2014).
Kurochkina M.N. Nekotorye voprosy sovershenstvovaniya zakonodatel stva o priemnoy sem e // CHernye dyry v Rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2010. №6. S.56-60.
Levushkin A.N. Osobennosti primeneniya i poryadok lisheniya roditel skikh prav v gosudarstvakh Baltii // CHernye dyry v Rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2011. №1 S.43-45.
Nechaeva A.M. Semeynoe pravo. Kurs lektsiy. - M.:YUrist , 1998. 248s.
Pamyatka dlya roditeley, kotorye po uvazhitel nym prichinam ne mogut ispolnyat svoi roditel skie obyazannosti // Ofitsial nyy sayt Prokuratury Nenetskogo avtonomnogo okruga. URL: http://prokuratura-nao.ru/2012-10-24-08-55-28/2011-05-10-06-53-58/1498-pamyatka-dlya-roditelej-kotorye-po-uvazhitelnym-prichinam-vremenno-ne-mogut-ispolnyat-svoi-roditelskie-obyazannosti (data obrashcheniya: 12.10.2014).
Tatarintseva E.A. Sovremennye tipy usynovleniya po semeynomu zakonodatel stvu Rossiyskoy Federatsii // CHernye dyry v Rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2011. № 2. S.50-54.

Temporary(emergency And voluntary) custody (guardianship), protection of the rights of minor children, the term of temporary (emergency And voluntary) custody(guardianship).